Ampelomyces strains isolated from diverse powdery mildew hosts in Japan: Their phylogeny and mycoparasitic activity, including timing and quantifying mycoparasitism of Pseudoidium neolycopersici on tomato.
Ascomycota
/ classification
Genes, Fungal
Host Specificity
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
Japan
Solanum lycopersicum
/ microbiology
Pest Control, Biological
Phylogeny
Seedlings
/ microbiology
Sequence Alignment
Sequence Homology, Nucleic Acid
Species Specificity
Spores, Fungal
/ ultrastructure
Time Factors
Trichomes
/ microbiology
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
15
12
2020
accepted:
27
04
2021
entrez:
11
5
2021
pubmed:
12
5
2021
medline:
26
10
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
A total of 26 Ampelomyces strains were isolated from mycelia of six different powdery mildew species that naturally infected their host plants in Japan. These were characterized based on morphological characteristics and sequences of ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer (rDNA-ITS) regions and actin gene (ACT) fragments. Collected strains represented six different genotypes and were accommodated in three different clades of the genus Ampelomyces. Morphology of the strains agreed with that of other Ampelomyces strains, but none of the examined characters were associated with any groups identified in the genetic analysis. Five powdery mildew species were inoculated with eight selected Ampelomyces strains to study their mycoparasitic activity. In the inoculation experiments, all Ampelomyces strains successfully infected all tested powdery mildew species, and showed no significant differences in their mycoparasitic activity as determined by the number of Ampelomyces pycnidia developed in powdery mildew colonies. The mycoparasitic interaction between the eight selected Ampelomyces strains and the tomato powdery mildew fungus (Pseudoidium neolycopersici strain KTP-03) was studied experimentally in the laboratory using digital microscopic technologies. It was documented that the spores of the mycoparasites germinated on tomato leaves and their hyphae penetrated the hyphae of Ps. neolycopersici. Ampelomyces hyphae continued their growth internally, which initiated the atrophy of the powdery mildew conidiophores 5 days post inoculation (dpi); caused atrophy 6 dpi; and complete collapse of the parasitized conidiphores 7 dpi. Ampelomyces strains produced new intracellular pycnidia in Ps. neolycopersici conidiophores ca. 8-10 dpi, when Ps. neolycopersici hyphae were successfully destroyed by the mycoparasitic strain. Mature pycnidia released spores ca. 10-14 dpi, which became the sources of subsequent infections of the intact powdery mildew hyphae. Mature pycnidia contained each ca. 200 to 1,500 spores depending on the mycohost species and Ampelomyces strain. This is the first detailed analysis of Ampelomyces strains isolated in Japan, and the first timing and quantification of mycoparasitism of Ps. neolycopersici on tomato by phylogenetically diverse Ampelomyces strains using digital microscopic technologies. The developed model system is useful for future biocontrol and ecological studies on Ampelomyces mycoparasites.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33974648
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251444
pii: PONE-D-20-39222
pmc: PMC8112701
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0251444Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
J Exp Bot. 2000 Mar;51(344):497-505
pubmed: 10938806
Phytopathology. 2019 Aug;109(8):1404-1416
pubmed: 30900938
Pest Manag Sci. 2003 Apr;59(4):475-83
pubmed: 12701710
Phytopathology. 2012 Jul;102(7):707-16
pubmed: 22512466
Bioinformatics. 2014 May 1;30(9):1312-3
pubmed: 24451623
Phytopathology. 1999 Aug;89(8):631-8
pubmed: 18944674
Mol Ecol. 2017 Apr;26(7):1964-1979
pubmed: 27859910
Front Microbiol. 2018 Jan 19;9:12
pubmed: 29403464
Mycol Res. 2005 Apr;109(Pt 4):429-38
pubmed: 15912930
Photosynth Res. 2012 Mar;111(3):315-26
pubmed: 22302592
Methods Mol Biol. 2000;132:115-30
pubmed: 10547834
Microbiol Res. 2000 Sep;155(3):179-95
pubmed: 11061186
Plant Dis. 2002 Aug;86(8):915-918
pubmed: 30818648
Phytopathology. 2015 Feb;105(2):199-209
pubmed: 25185010
Front Microbiol. 2020 Jul 16;11:1571
pubmed: 32765452
Bioinformatics. 2001 Aug;17(8):754-5
pubmed: 11524383
BMC Bioinformatics. 2010 Jan 05;11:7
pubmed: 20051126
Mol Ecol. 1993 Apr;2(2):113-8
pubmed: 8180733
Plant Dis. 1997 Feb;81(2):227
pubmed: 30870903
Mycol Res. 2009 Mar;113(Pt 3):364-72
pubmed: 19070662
Plants (Basel). 2020 Sep 07;9(9):
pubmed: 32906683
Mycol Res. 2003 Jan;107(Pt 1):64-71
pubmed: 12735245
New Phytol. 1998 Dec;140(4):709-714
pubmed: 33862949
Mycopathologia. 1997;139(3):157-64
pubmed: 16283455
Curr Genet. 1998 May;33(5):362-7
pubmed: 9618587
Mol Ecol. 2011 Apr;20(7):1492-507
pubmed: 21261766
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 03;11(2):e0148025
pubmed: 26839970
Fungal Biol. 2010 Feb-Mar;114(2-3):235-47
pubmed: 20943134