Exomer complex regulates protein traffic at the TGN through differential interactions with cargos and clathrin adaptor complexes.
ADP-Ribosylation Factor 1
/ metabolism
Adaptor Proteins, Vesicular Transport
/ metabolism
Cell Membrane
/ metabolism
Chitin Synthase
/ metabolism
Endosomes
/ metabolism
Protein Transport
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
/ genetics
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins
/ metabolism
trans-Golgi Network
/ metabolism
TGN
clathrin adaptor
endosomes
exomer
intracelullar traffic
Journal
FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology
ISSN: 1530-6860
Titre abrégé: FASEB J
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8804484
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2021
06 2021
Historique:
revised:
01
04
2021
received:
03
12
2020
accepted:
07
04
2021
entrez:
12
5
2021
pubmed:
13
5
2021
medline:
20
7
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Protein sorting at the trans-Golgi network (TGN) usually requires the assistance of cargo adaptors. However, it remains to be examined how the same complex can mediate both the export and retention of different proteins or how sorting complexes interact among themselves. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the exomer complex is involved in the polarized transport of some proteins from the TGN to the plasma membrane (PM). Intriguingly, exomer and its cargos also show a sort of functional relationship with TGN clathrin adaptors that is still unsolved. Here, using a wide range of techniques, including time-lapse and BIFC microscopy, we describe new molecular implications of the exomer complex in protein sorting and address its different layers of functional interaction with clathrin adaptor complexes. Exomer mutants show impaired amino acid uptake because it facilitates not only the polarized delivery of amino acid permeases to the PM but also participates in their endosomal traffic. We propose a model for exomer where it modulates the recruitment of TGN clathrin adaptors directly or indirectly through the Arf1 function. Moreover, we describe an in vivo competitive relationship between the exomer and AP-1 complexes for the model cargo Chs3. These results highlight a broad role for exomer in regulating protein sorting at the TGN that is complementary to its role as cargo adaptor and present a model to understand the complexity of TGN protein sorting.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33978245
doi: 10.1096/fj.202002610R
pmc: PMC9066374
mid: NIHMS1798871
doi:
Substances chimiques
Adaptor Proteins, Vesicular Transport
0
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins
0
CHS3 protein, S cerevisiae
EC 2.4.1.16
CHS5 protein, S cerevisiae
EC 2.4.1.16
Chitin Synthase
EC 2.4.1.16
ADP-Ribosylation Factor 1
EC 3.6.5.2
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e21615Subventions
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R01 GM092741
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2021 Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.
Références
J Cell Biol. 1997 Jan 13;136(1):95-110
pubmed: 9008706
Traffic. 2015 Dec;16(12):1210-38
pubmed: 26403691
Mol Biol Cell. 1998 Jun;9(6):1565-76
pubmed: 9614194
J Cell Biol. 2006 Sep 25;174(7):973-83
pubmed: 17000877
Genetics. 1985 Jan;109(1):21-35
pubmed: 3881312
J Cell Biol. 1999 Jun 14;145(6):1153-63
pubmed: 10366589
EMBO Rep. 2016 Feb;17(2):202-19
pubmed: 26742961
Genetics. 2018 Aug;209(4):1121-1138
pubmed: 29925567
Curr Genet. 2002 Sep;41(6):367-78
pubmed: 12228806
J Cell Sci. 2011 Apr 1;124(Pt 7):1055-66
pubmed: 21363887
Cell. 1992 Oct 30;71(3):463-78
pubmed: 1423607
J Cell Biol. 2017 Oct 2;216(10):3275-3290
pubmed: 28768685
Yeast. 1998 Jul;14(10):953-61
pubmed: 9717241
J Biol Chem. 2013 Feb 1;288(5):3594-608
pubmed: 23250744
Dev Cell. 2012 Apr 17;22(4):799-810
pubmed: 22516198
Elife. 2014 Nov 07;3:
pubmed: 25380227
Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Oct;14(10):6597-606
pubmed: 7523855
Elife. 2020 Jun 25;9:
pubmed: 32584255
Mol Cell Biol. 1988 Feb;8(2):664-73
pubmed: 3280970
Sci Rep. 2018 Aug 9;8(1):11919
pubmed: 30093662
Cell. 1994 May 20;77(4):579-86
pubmed: 8187177
Yeast. 2005 May;22(7):583-91
pubmed: 15942936
Mol Biol Cell. 2009 Dec;20(23):4985-96
pubmed: 19812245
Biol Cell. 2020 Nov;112(11):349-367
pubmed: 32761633
J Cell Biol. 1999 Sep 20;146(6):1227-38
pubmed: 10491387
Dev Cell. 2002 Mar;2(3):283-94
pubmed: 11879634
Mol Biol Cell. 2007 May;18(5):1803-15
pubmed: 17344475
J Biol Chem. 2019 Jan 25;294(4):1410-1419
pubmed: 30523155
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 13;10(3):e0120250
pubmed: 25767889
Trends Cell Biol. 2011 Feb;21(2):113-21
pubmed: 21282087
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008 Apr;9(4):273-84
pubmed: 18354421
FEMS Yeast Res. 2015 May;15(3):
pubmed: 25725023
Nat Cell Biol. 2012 Feb 19;14(3):239-48
pubmed: 22344030
Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 24;8(1):11154
pubmed: 30042439
Yeast. 2003 Dec;20(16):1339-47
pubmed: 14663826
J Cell Biol. 2011 Jan 24;192(2):229-42
pubmed: 21242292
Mol Biol Cell. 2003 Apr;14(4):1319-33
pubmed: 12686590
Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2014;30:169-206
pubmed: 25150009
Mol Biol Cell. 2017 Dec 1;28(25):3672-3685
pubmed: 29021337
Cell. 2004 Jan 23;116(2):153-66
pubmed: 14744428
PLoS Biol. 2006 Oct;4(11):e351
pubmed: 17048990
Curr Biol. 2012 Sep 25;22(18):1711-6
pubmed: 22902756
Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2008 Feb;72(2):582-6
pubmed: 18256475
EMBO J. 2012 Nov 5;31(21):4191-203
pubmed: 23000721
Traffic. 2010 Jun;11(6):732-42
pubmed: 20214751
J Biol Chem. 2009 Aug 28;284(35):23830-41
pubmed: 19574226
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Jun 11;116(24):11796-11805
pubmed: 31142645
Mol Cell Biol. 2003 Nov;23(21):7566-84
pubmed: 14560004
EMBO J. 2006 Oct 4;25(19):4436-47
pubmed: 16977312
J Cell Sci. 2019 Aug 2;132(15):
pubmed: 31289195
Methods Mol Biol. 2016;1369:59-72
pubmed: 26519305
Curr Biol. 2002 Sep 17;12(18):1623-7
pubmed: 12372257
Genetics. 2018 Apr;208(4):1483-1498
pubmed: 29437703
Methods Mol Biol. 2011;745:173-91
pubmed: 21660695
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2018 Feb 7;82(1):
pubmed: 29436478
Dev Cell. 2018 Jan 8;44(1):56-72.e4
pubmed: 29316441
Yeast. 2007 Sep;24(9):767-75
pubmed: 17534848
Cell Logist. 2014 Jan 1;4(1):e28114
pubmed: 24843829
Dev Cell. 2014 Sep 8;30(5):610-24
pubmed: 25203211
J Basic Microbiol. 2006;46(5):416-29
pubmed: 17009297
Yeast. 1999 Oct;15(14):1541-53
pubmed: 10514571
Cell Rep. 2014 Apr 10;7(1):249-60
pubmed: 24656818
Mol Biol Cell. 2012 Nov;23(22):4402-15
pubmed: 23015758
PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e46386
pubmed: 23056294
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 02;8(7):e67902
pubmed: 23844123
Traffic. 2001 Aug;2(8):565-76
pubmed: 11489214
J Bacteriol. 2000 Oct;182(20):5730-6
pubmed: 11004171
Genetics. 2012 Mar;190(3):885-929
pubmed: 22419079
Mol Biol Cell. 2016 Dec 15;27(25):4021-4032
pubmed: 27798229
EMBO J. 2006 Mar 8;25(5):943-54
pubmed: 16498409
Nat Cell Biol. 2004 Mar;6(3):252-9
pubmed: 15039776
Mol Biol Cell. 2016 Feb 1;27(3):588-98
pubmed: 26658609
Mol Microbiol. 2013 Oct;90(2):252-66
pubmed: 23926947
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005 Jul 10;1744(3):415-37
pubmed: 15922462
Mutat Res. 1978 May;57(2):155-61
pubmed: 351388
Mol Biol Cell. 1998 Mar;9(3):653-70
pubmed: 9487133
Genetics. 2017 Feb;205(2):673-690
pubmed: 27974503
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2014 Sep 03;2:47
pubmed: 25364754
J Cell Biol. 2014 Jan 6;204(1):7-17
pubmed: 24395635