Modeling the anaerobic digestion of wastewater sludge under sulfate-rich conditions.
anaerobic treatment of high sulfate wastewater
chemical oxygen demand correction
sulfate-reducing bacteria
sulfide primary inhibition
sulfide secondary inhibition
Journal
Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation
ISSN: 1554-7531
Titre abrégé: Water Environ Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9886167
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2021
Oct 2021
Historique:
revised:
03
05
2021
received:
07
12
2020
accepted:
05
05
2021
pubmed:
16
5
2021
medline:
21
10
2021
entrez:
15
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Anaerobic digestion (AD) is a biological treatment process to stabilize organic solids and produce biogas. If present, sulfate is reduced to sulfide by anaerobic sulfate-reducing bacteria and the sulfide can be toxic to anaerobic microorganisms. Here, the effect of high initial sulfate concentration on AD of wastewater sludge was investigated using lab-scale batch experiments. Additionally, a systematic mathematical modeling approach was applied for insight into the experimental results. Cumulative biogas and methane production decreased with increasing initial sulfate doses (0-3.300 mg S L
Substances chimiques
Sewage
0
Sulfates
0
Waste Water
0
Methane
OP0UW79H66
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2084-2096Subventions
Organisme : Ministry of Research and Innovation
ID : Ontario Research Fund-Research Excellence / RE09-0
Organisme : Ministry of Research and Innovation
ID : Ontario Research Fund-Research Infrastructure / 31
Organisme : Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
ID : Discovery Accelerator Supplement/RGPAS-2019-0010
Organisme : Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
ID : Discovery Grants / RGPIN-2019-06747
Organisme : Ontario Water Consortium
ID : Advancing Water Technologies / SUB02394
Organisme : Canada Foundation for Innovation
ID : Leaders Opportunity Fund / 31604
Informations de copyright
© 2021 Water Environment Federation.
Références
Angelidaki, I., Alves, M., Bolzonella, D., Borzacconi, L., Campos, J. L., Guwy, A. J., Kalyuzhnyi, S., Jenicek, P., & van Lier, J. B. (2009). Defining the biomethane potential (BMP) of solid organic wastes and energy crops: A proposed protocol for batch assays. Water Science and Technology, 59(5), 927-934. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2009.040
Barrera, E. L., Spanjers, H., Romero, O., Rosa, E., & Dewulf, J. (2014). Characterization of the sulfate reduction process in the anaerobic digestion of a very high strength and sulfate rich vinasse. Chemical Engineering Journal, 248, 383-393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.03.057
Barrera, E. L., Spanjers, H., Solon, K., Amerlinck, Y., Nopens, I., & Dewulf, J. (2015). Modeling the anaerobic digestion of cane-molasses vinasse: Extension of the Anaerobic Digestion Model No. 1 (ADM1) with sulfate reduction for a very high strength and sulfate rich wastewater. Water Research, 71, 42-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.12.026
Brahmacharimayum, B., Mohanty, M. P., & Ghosh, P. K. (2019). Theoretical and practical aspects of biological sulfate reduction: A review. Global NEST Journal, 21(2), 222-244. https://doi.org/10.30955/gnj.002577
Cetecioglu, Z., Dolfing, J., Taylor, J., Purdy, K. J., & Eyice, Ö. (2019). COD/sulfate ratio does not affect the methane yield and microbial diversity in anaerobic digesters. Water Research, 155, 444-454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.02.038
Chen, J. L., Ortiz, R., Steele, T. W. J., & Stuckey, D. C. (2014). Toxicants inhibiting anaerobic digestion: A review. Biotechnology Advances, 32(8), 1523-1534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.10.005
Cheng, S., Xing, D., Call, D., & Logan, B. E. (2009). Direct biological conversion of electrical current into methane by electromethanogenesis. Environmental Science and Tehnology, 43, 3953-3958.
Chen, Y., Cheng, J. J., & Creamer, K. S. (2008). Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: A review. Bioresource Technology, 99(10), 4044-4064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.01.057
Giménez, J. B., Carretero, L., Gatti, M. N., Martí, N., Borrás, L., Ribes, J., & Seco, A. (2012). Reliable method for assessing the COD mass balance of a submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor (SAMBR) treating sulphate-rich municipal wastewater. Water Science and Technology, 66(3), 494-502. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2012.184
Giménez, J. B., Martí, N., Ferrer, J., & Seco, A. (2012). Methane recovery efficiency in a submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor (SAnMBR) treating sulphate-rich urban wastewater: Evaluation of methane losses with the effluent. Bioresource Technology, 118, 67-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.05.019
Giménez, J. B., Robles, A., Carretero, L., Durán, F., Ruano, M. V., Gatti, M. N., Ribes, J., Ferrer, J., & Seco, A. (2011). Experimental study of the anaerobic urban wastewater treatment in a submerged hollow-fibre membrane bioreactor at pilot scale. Bioresource Technology, 102(19), 8799-8806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.07.014
Han, D., Lee, C.-Y., Chang, S. W., & Kim, D.-J. (2018). Enhanced methane production and wastewater sludge stabilization of a continuous full scale thermal pretreatment and thermophilic anaerobic digestion. Bioresource Technology, 245, 1162-1167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.08.108
Harada, H., Uemura, S., & Momonoi, K. (1994). Interaction between sulfate reducing bacteria and methane producing bacteria in UASB reactors fed with low strength wastes containing different levels of sulfate. Water Research, 28(n2), 355-367. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(94)90273-9
J.W.H., S., Elferink, O., Visser, A., Hulshoff Pol, L. W., & Stams, A. J. M. (1994). Sulfate reduction in methanogenic bioreactors. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 15(2-3), 119-136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.1994.tb00130.x
Jeong, T.-Y., Cha, G.-C., Seo, Y.-C., Jeon, C., & Choi, S. S. (2008). Effect of COD/sulfate ratios on batch anaerobic digestion using waste activated sludge. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 14(5), 693-697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2008.05.006
Leslie Grady, C. P., Daigger, G. T., Love, N. G., & Filipe, C. D. M. (2011). Biological wastewater treatment, 3rd ed. IWA Publishing.
Li, J., Yu, L., Yu, D., Wang, D., Zhang, P., & Ji, Z. (2014). Performance and granulation in an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor treating saline sulfate wastewater. Biodegradation, 25(1), 127-136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10532-013-9645-2
Liu, Z.-H., Maszenan, A. M., Liu, Y., & Ng, W. J. (2015). “A brief review on possible approaches towards controlling sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) in wastewater treatment systems”, Desalination. Desalination and Water Treatment, 53(10), 2799-2807. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2014.943023
Lu, X., Zhen, G., Ni, J., Hojo, T., Kubota, K., & Li, Y. Y. (2016). Effect of influent COD/SO 42- ratios on biodegradation behaviors of starch wastewater in an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor. Bioresource Technology, 214, 175-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.04.100
Maillacheruvu, K. Y., Parkin, G. F., Peng, C. Y., Kuo, W.-C., Oonge, Z. I., & Lebduschka, V. (1993). Sulfide toxicity in anaerobic systems fed sulfate and various organics. Water Environment Research, 65(2), 100-109. https://doi.org/10.2175/wer.65.2.2
Moñino, P., Aguado, D., Barat, R., Jiménez, E., Giménez, J. B., Seco, A., & Ferrer, J. (2017). A new strategy to maximize organic matter valorization in municipalities: Combination of urban wastewater with kitchen food waste and its treatment with AnMBR technology. Waste Management, 62, 274-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.02.006
Noyola, J. M., Morgan-Sagastume, J. M., & López-Hernández, J. E. (2006). Treatment of biogas produced in anaerobic reactors for domestic wastewater: Odor control and energy/resource recovery. Reviews in Environmental Science & Biotechnology, 5(1), 93-114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-005-2754-6
O’Flaherty, V., Mahony, T., O’Kennedy, R., & Colleran, E. (1998). Effect of pH on growth kinetics and sulphide toxicity thresholds of a range of methanogenic, syntrophic and sulphate-reducing bacteria. Process Biochemistry, 33(5), 555-569.
Oleszkiewicz, J. A., Marstaller, T., & Mccartney, D. M. (1989). Effects of pH on sulfide toxicity to anaerobic processes. Environmental Technology Letters, 10, 815-822. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593338909384801
Plugge, M., Zhang, W., Scholten, J. C. M., & Stams, A. J. M. (2011). Metabolic flexibility of sulfate-reducing bacteria. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2011.00081
Poinapen, J., & Ekama, G. (2010). Biological sulphate reduction with primary sewage sludge in an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor - Part 6: Development of a kinetic model for BSR. Water SA, 36(3), 203-213.
Polprasert, C., & Haas, C. (1995). Effect of sulfate on anaerobic processes fed with dual substrates. Water Science and Technology, 31(9), 101-107.
Rittmann, B. E., & McCarty, P. L. (2001). Environmental biotechnology: Principles and applications, 1st ed. McGraw-Hill.
Robles, Á., Durán, F., Giménez, J. B., Jiménez, E., Ribes, J., Serralta, J., Seco, A., Ferrer, J., & Rogalla, F. (2020). Anaerobic membrane bioreactors (AnMBR) treating urban wastewater in mild climates. Bioresource Technology, 314, 123763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123763
Shin, H. S., Jung, J. Y., Bae, B. U., & Paik, B. C. (1995). Phase-separated anaerobic toxicity assays for sulfate and sulfide. Water Environment Research, 67(5), 802-806. https://doi.org/10.2175/106143095x131718
Stams, J. M., Plugge, C. M., de Bok, F., van Houten, B., Lens, P., Dijkman, H., & Weijma, J. (2005). Metabolic interactions in methanogenic and sulfate-reducing bioreactors. Water Science and Technology, 52(1-2), 13-20.
Stumm, W., & Morgan, J. (1996). Aquatic Chemistry, 3rd edition. John Wiley and Sons.
Thauer, R. K., Jungermann, K., & Decker, K. (1977). Energy conservation in chemotrophic anaerobic bacteria. Bacteriological Reviews, 41(1), 100-180.
Wei, I., Hao, X., Van Loosdrecht, M. C. M., & Li, J. (2018). Feasibility analysis of anaerobic digestion of excess sludge enhanced by iron: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 89, 16-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.02.042
Yuan, H., & Zhu, N. (2016). Progress in inhibition mechanisms and process control of intermediates and by-products in sewage sludge anaerobic digestion. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 58, 429-438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.261
Zamariolli Damianovic, M. H. R., Saia, F. T., de Godoi, L. A. G., & Foresti, E. (2016). Long-term operation of anaerobic immobilized biomass reactor treating organic wastewater containing sulfate. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 13, 100-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2016.08.009
Zhen, G., Lu, X., Kato, H., Zhao, Y., & Li, Y.-Y. (2017). Overview of pretreatment strategies for enhancing sewage sludge disintegration and subsequent anaerobic digestion: Current advances, full-scale application and future perspectives. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 69, 559-577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.187
Zhuan, R., Yang, G., Zhang, G., & Wang, W. (2018). Effects of ferric salts on sludge anaerobic digestion and desulphurization. Materials Science Forum, 913, 887-892. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.913.887