A comprehensive survey of developmental programs reveals a dearth of tree-like lineage graphs and ubiquitous regeneration.

Asymmetric cell division Cell type lineage graph Development Homeostatic organism Pluripotent Regeneration Signaling

Journal

BMC biology
ISSN: 1741-7007
Titre abrégé: BMC Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101190720

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
21 05 2021
Historique:
received: 02 07 2020
accepted: 24 03 2021
entrez: 22 5 2021
pubmed: 23 5 2021
medline: 2 2 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Multicellular organisms are characterized by a wide diversity of forms and complexity despite a restricted set of key molecules and mechanisms at the base of organismal development. Development combines three basic processes-asymmetric cell division, signaling, and gene regulation-in a multitude of ways to create this overwhelming diversity of multicellular life forms. Here, we use a generative model to test the limits to which such processes can be combined to generate multiple differentiation paths during development, and attempt to chart the diversity of multicellular organisms generated. We sample millions of biologically feasible developmental schemes, allowing us to comment on the statistical properties of cell differentiation trajectories they produce. We characterize model-generated "organisms" using the graph topology of their cell type lineage maps. Remarkably, tree-type lineage differentiation maps are the rarest in our data. Additionally, a majority of the "organisms" generated by our model appear to be endowed with the ability to regenerate using pluripotent cells. Our results indicate that, in contrast to common views, cell type lineage graphs are unlikely to be tree-like. Instead, they are more likely to be directed acyclic graphs, with multiple lineages converging on the same terminal cell type. Furthermore, the high incidence of pluripotent cells in model-generated organisms stands in line with the long-standing hypothesis that whole body regeneration is an epiphenomenon of development. We discuss experimentally testable predictions of our model and some ways to adapt the generative framework to test additional hypotheses about general features of development.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Multicellular organisms are characterized by a wide diversity of forms and complexity despite a restricted set of key molecules and mechanisms at the base of organismal development. Development combines three basic processes-asymmetric cell division, signaling, and gene regulation-in a multitude of ways to create this overwhelming diversity of multicellular life forms. Here, we use a generative model to test the limits to which such processes can be combined to generate multiple differentiation paths during development, and attempt to chart the diversity of multicellular organisms generated.
RESULTS
We sample millions of biologically feasible developmental schemes, allowing us to comment on the statistical properties of cell differentiation trajectories they produce. We characterize model-generated "organisms" using the graph topology of their cell type lineage maps. Remarkably, tree-type lineage differentiation maps are the rarest in our data. Additionally, a majority of the "organisms" generated by our model appear to be endowed with the ability to regenerate using pluripotent cells.
CONCLUSIONS
Our results indicate that, in contrast to common views, cell type lineage graphs are unlikely to be tree-like. Instead, they are more likely to be directed acyclic graphs, with multiple lineages converging on the same terminal cell type. Furthermore, the high incidence of pluripotent cells in model-generated organisms stands in line with the long-standing hypothesis that whole body regeneration is an epiphenomenon of development. We discuss experimentally testable predictions of our model and some ways to adapt the generative framework to test additional hypotheses about general features of development.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34020630
doi: 10.1186/s12915-021-01013-4
pii: 10.1186/s12915-021-01013-4
pmc: PMC8140435
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

111

Subventions

Organisme : Institute of Basic Science
ID : IBS-R020-D1

Références

J R Soc Interface. 2015 Nov 6;12(112):
pubmed: 26538560
J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol. 2021 Apr;336(3):250-266
pubmed: 32190983
Cell. 2010 May 14;141(4):559-63
pubmed: 20478246
Nat Commun. 2013;4:1880
pubmed: 23695674
J R Soc Interface. 2013 Jan 6;10(78):20120574
pubmed: 23034351
J Theor Biol. 2003 Jul 7;223(1):1-18
pubmed: 12782112
Development. 2019 Jun 27;146(12):
pubmed: 31249007
Science. 2018 May 25;360(6391):
pubmed: 29674432
Science. 2018 Jun 1;360(6392):981-987
pubmed: 29700229
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Sep 11;104(37):14735-40
pubmed: 17766437
Nucleic Acids Res. 2010 Jan;38(Database issue):D750-3
pubmed: 19854939
J Theor Biol. 2013 Oct 21;335:130-46
pubmed: 23774067
Cell Stem Cell. 2018 Aug 02;23(2):166-179
pubmed: 29754780
Nature. 2000 Jul 13;406(6792):188-92
pubmed: 10910359
Science. 2002 Feb 22;295(5559):1482-5
pubmed: 11859185
Dev Dyn. 2005 Aug;233(4):1177-93
pubmed: 15973692
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2014 Feb;12(2):115-24
pubmed: 24384602
Nat Commun. 2019 Jun 3;10(1):2395
pubmed: 31160568
Development. 2019 Jun 27;146(12):
pubmed: 31249003
Integr Comp Biol. 2010 Oct;50(4):515-27
pubmed: 21558220
Nucleic Acids Res. 2020 Jan 8;48(D1):D407-D415
pubmed: 31701150
Elife. 2019 Apr 08;8:
pubmed: 30958266
Nat Biotechnol. 2019 May;37(5):547-554
pubmed: 30936559
Science. 2019 Jul 26;365(6451):
pubmed: 31346039
Dev Biol. 2016 Nov 1;419(1):99-113
pubmed: 27451296
Proc Biol Sci. 2019 Mar 13;286(1898):20182524
pubmed: 30836873
Dev Biol. 2012 Sep 15;369(2):151-62
pubmed: 22722095
Cell. 2018 Oct 4;175(2):327-345
pubmed: 30290140
PLoS Biol. 2013 Oct;11(10):e1001696
pubmed: 24204211
Bioessays. 2014 Feb;36(2):151-6
pubmed: 24323952
J Theor Biol. 1992 Nov 21;159(2):241-60
pubmed: 1294847
Development. 2011 Aug;138(15):3103-11
pubmed: 21750026
Cell. 2008 Feb 22;132(4):583-97
pubmed: 18295577
Development. 2017 Dec 1;144(23):4214-4225
pubmed: 29183935
J Theor Biol. 2005 Aug 7;235(3):431-49
pubmed: 15882705
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2000 Jun 29;355(1398):757-66; discussion 766-7
pubmed: 10905608
Cell. 2019 Feb 21;176(5):1158-1173.e16
pubmed: 30712869

Auteurs

Somya Mani (S)

Center for Soft and Living Matter, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Ulsan, 44919, South Korea. somyamn@gmail.com.

Tsvi Tlusty (T)

Center for Soft and Living Matter, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Ulsan, 44919, South Korea. tsvitlusty@gmail.com.
Department of Physics, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST), Ulsan, 44919, South Korea. tsvitlusty@gmail.com.

Articles similaires

A key role for P2RX5 in brown adipocyte differentiation and energy homeostasis.

Maria Razzoli, Seth McGonigle, Bhavani Shankar Sahu et al.
1.00
Animals Adipocytes, Brown Mice Cell Differentiation Male

Identification of CD141

Gabee Park, Dae Yeon Hwang, Do Young Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Mesenchymal Stem Cells Animals Mice Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation
Wnt-5a Protein Animals Cell Differentiation Odontogenesis Humans
Humans Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Schizophrenia Neural Stem Cells DNA Damage

Classifications MeSH