The Widened Pipe Model of plant hydraulic evolution.
Pareto optimality
adaptation
allometry
plant hydraulics
xylem
Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
ISSN: 1091-6490
Titre abrégé: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7505876
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 06 2021
01 06 2021
Historique:
entrez:
27
5
2021
pubmed:
28
5
2021
medline:
15
12
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Shaping global water and carbon cycles, plants lift water from roots to leaves through xylem conduits. The importance of xylem water conduction makes it crucial to understand how natural selection deploys conduit diameters within and across plants. Wider conduits transport more water but are likely more vulnerable to conduction-blocking gas embolisms and cost more for a plant to build, a tension necessarily shaping xylem conduit diameters along plant stems. We build on this expectation to present the Widened Pipe Model (WPM) of plant hydraulic evolution, testing it against a global dataset. The WPM predicts that xylem conduits should be narrowest at the stem tips, widening quickly before plateauing toward the stem base. This universal profile emerges from Pareto modeling of a trade-off between just two competing vectors of natural selection: one favoring rapid widening of conduits tip to base, minimizing hydraulic resistance, and another favoring slow widening of conduits, minimizing carbon cost and embolism risk. Our data spanning terrestrial plant orders, life forms, habitats, and sizes conform closely to WPM predictions. The WPM highlights carbon economy as a powerful vector of natural selection shaping plant function. It further implies that factors that cause resistance in plant conductive systems, such as conduit pit membrane resistance, should scale in exact harmony with tip-to-base conduit widening. Furthermore, the WPM implies that alterations in the environments of individual plants should lead to changes in plant height, for example, shedding terminal branches and resprouting at lower height under drier climates, thus achieving narrower and potentially more embolism-resistant conduits.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34039710
pii: 2100314118
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2100314118
pmc: PMC8179198
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Water
059QF0KO0R
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no competing interest.
Références
New Phytol. 2009;184(1):234-244
pubmed: 19674329
New Phytol. 2019 Mar;221(4):1802-1813
pubmed: 30312484
Sci Adv. 2019 Feb 13;5(2):eaav1332
pubmed: 30788435
New Phytol. 2006;169(2):279-90
pubmed: 16411931
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jul 17;115(29):7551-7556
pubmed: 29967148
New Phytol. 2021 Feb;229(4):1877-1893
pubmed: 32984967
Biol Lett. 2007 Feb 22;3(1):86-9
pubmed: 17443973
Nature. 2018 Jun;558(7711):531-539
pubmed: 29950621
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2015 Sep;92(3):032807
pubmed: 26465528
Ecol Lett. 2014 Aug;17(8):988-97
pubmed: 24847972
J Theor Biol. 2009 Jul 7;259(1):1-4
pubmed: 19289132
Ecology. 2010 Apr;91(4):1102-13
pubmed: 20462124
Nature. 2001 May 31;411(6837):546-7
pubmed: 11385559
J Exp Bot. 2019 Oct 24;70(20):5765-5772
pubmed: 31328237
Nature. 2014 Aug 7;512(7512):39-43
pubmed: 25043056
Plant Physiol. 1990 Oct;94(2):621-7
pubmed: 16667757
New Phytol. 2020 Mar;225(6):2347-2355
pubmed: 31657018
Ecology. 2013 Aug;94(8):1708-17
pubmed: 24015515
Am Nat. 1993 Oct;142(4):573-84
pubmed: 19425961
Nat Plants. 2015 Sep 28;1:15139
pubmed: 27251391
New Phytol. 2019 Oct;224(2):644-662
pubmed: 31349369
J Theor Biol. 2020 Oct 7;502:110369
pubmed: 32526220
Tree Physiol. 2019 Feb 1;39(2):243-261
pubmed: 30299503
Nature. 2014 Feb 6;506(7486):89-92
pubmed: 24362564
Plant Cell Environ. 2010 Jul;33(7):1059-69
pubmed: 20199629
Science. 2012 Jun 1;336(6085):1157-60
pubmed: 22539553
Ecol Lett. 2007 Nov;10(11):1084-93
pubmed: 17850336
Am J Bot. 1999 Oct;86(10):1367-72
pubmed: 10523278
J Exp Bot. 2020 Jul 6;71(14):4232-4242
pubmed: 32219309
Plant Physiol. 2006 Jan;140(1):374-82
pubmed: 16377751
J Exp Bot. 2019 Nov 18;70(21):5990-5993
pubmed: 31738433
Plant Cell Environ. 2011 Nov;34(11):1819-34
pubmed: 21689111
Tree Physiol. 2012 Feb;32(2):171-7
pubmed: 22262584
Nature. 2014 Mar 6;507(7490):90-3
pubmed: 24429523
Plant Cell Environ. 2018 Aug;41(8):1821-1839
pubmed: 29739034
J Exp Biol. 2005 May;208(Pt 9):1749-69
pubmed: 15855405
Science. 2008 Jun 27;320(5884):1768-71
pubmed: 18583610
Ecol Lett. 2018 Oct;21(10):1552-1560
pubmed: 30125446
New Phytol. 2018 Aug;219(3):947-958
pubmed: 28585237
Plant Cell Environ. 2018 Dec;41(12):2718-2730
pubmed: 30071137
Front Plant Sci. 2012 Jun 06;3:107
pubmed: 22685446
New Phytol. 2018 Jun;218(4):1360-1370
pubmed: 29603233
Nature. 2003 Feb 27;421(6926):939-42
pubmed: 12607000
Nat Commun. 2019 Sep 26;10(1):4385
pubmed: 31558795
Nature. 2015 Dec 3;528(7580):119-22
pubmed: 26595275
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Dec 28;107(52):22722-7
pubmed: 21149696
Tree Physiol. 2014 Feb;34(2):137-45
pubmed: 24488857