Anastomotic leak in patients with acute complicated diverticulitis undergoing primary anastomosis: risk factors and the role of diverting loop ileostomy.
Diverticulitis
Ileostomy
Leak
Primary anastomosis
Journal
International journal of colorectal disease
ISSN: 1432-1262
Titre abrégé: Int J Colorectal Dis
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8607899
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2021
Jul 2021
Historique:
accepted:
16
05
2021
pubmed:
28
5
2021
medline:
24
6
2021
entrez:
27
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Recent data has suggested that primary anastomosis (PA), with or without a diverting loop ileostomy (DLI), is a safe option for the treatment of acute complicated diverticulitis. This study aimed to evaluate risk factors associated with anastomotic leak in patients who underwent a sigmoid colectomy with PA and to determine whether a DLI was protective against a clinically significant anastomotic leak. Patients with acute complicated diverticulitis who underwent a laparoscopic or open sigmoid colectomy with PA, with or without a DLI, were identified in the NSQIP PUF(2016-2017). The rates of anastomotic leak, receipt of DLI, and type of leak management were compared. Multivariate logistic regression was performed. There were 497 patients identified. Seventy-nine(15.9%) patients had a DLI, while 418 (84.1%) did not. Twenty-six anastomotic leaks were identified (5.2%). On multivariate analysis, current smoking (OR 4.02; 95% CI 1.44-11.26) and chronic steroid use (OR 3.84; 95% CI 1.16-12.69) were significantly associated with an increased risk of leak. Of the 26 patients with anastomotic leaks, 5 (19.2%) had a DLI. There was no significant difference in the rate of leak between those with a DLI(5; 6.3%) and those without(21; 5.3%; p = 0.59). Patients who had a DLI were significantly less likely to experience an anastomotic leak requiring re-operation (p < 0.01). Regardless of the presence of a DLI, chronic steroid use and smoking are associated with an increased risk of anastomotic leak in patients with acute complicated diverticulitis undergoing colectomy with PA. The presence of a diverting loop ileostomy is protective against re-operation.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Recent data has suggested that primary anastomosis (PA), with or without a diverting loop ileostomy (DLI), is a safe option for the treatment of acute complicated diverticulitis. This study aimed to evaluate risk factors associated with anastomotic leak in patients who underwent a sigmoid colectomy with PA and to determine whether a DLI was protective against a clinically significant anastomotic leak.
METHODS
METHODS
Patients with acute complicated diverticulitis who underwent a laparoscopic or open sigmoid colectomy with PA, with or without a DLI, were identified in the NSQIP PUF(2016-2017). The rates of anastomotic leak, receipt of DLI, and type of leak management were compared. Multivariate logistic regression was performed.
RESULTS
RESULTS
There were 497 patients identified. Seventy-nine(15.9%) patients had a DLI, while 418 (84.1%) did not. Twenty-six anastomotic leaks were identified (5.2%). On multivariate analysis, current smoking (OR 4.02; 95% CI 1.44-11.26) and chronic steroid use (OR 3.84; 95% CI 1.16-12.69) were significantly associated with an increased risk of leak. Of the 26 patients with anastomotic leaks, 5 (19.2%) had a DLI. There was no significant difference in the rate of leak between those with a DLI(5; 6.3%) and those without(21; 5.3%; p = 0.59). Patients who had a DLI were significantly less likely to experience an anastomotic leak requiring re-operation (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Regardless of the presence of a DLI, chronic steroid use and smoking are associated with an increased risk of anastomotic leak in patients with acute complicated diverticulitis undergoing colectomy with PA. The presence of a diverting loop ileostomy is protective against re-operation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34041593
doi: 10.1007/s00384-021-03957-z
pii: 10.1007/s00384-021-03957-z
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1543-1550Références
Lee JM, Bai P, Chang J, El Hechi M et al (2019) Hartmann's procedure vs primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy for acute diverticulitis: nationwide analysis of 2,729 emergency surgery patients. J Am Coll Surg 229:48
Salem L, Flum DR (2004) Primary anastomosis or Hartmann’s procedure for patients with diverticular peritonitis? A systematic review. Dis Colon Rectum 47(11):1953–1964
doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0701-1
Bridoux V (2017) Hartmann’s procedure or primary anastomosis for generalized peritonitis due to perforated diverticulitis: a prospective multicenter randomized trial. JACS (J Am College Surg) 225(6):798–805
doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.09.004
Lambrichts DPV, Vennix S, Musters GD et al (2019) Hartmann’s procedure versus sigmoidectomy with primary anastomosis for perforated diverticulitis with purulent or faecal peritonitis (LADIES): a multicentre, parallel-group, randomised, open-label, superiority trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 4(8):599–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30174-8
doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30174-8
pubmed: 31178342
Gachabayov M, Oberkofler CE, Tuech JJ, Hahnloser D, Bergamaschi R (2018) Resection with primary anastomosis vs nonrestorative resection for perforated diverticulitis with peritonitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 20(9):753–770. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.14237
doi: 10.1111/codi.14237
pubmed: 29694694
Cirocchi R, Afshar S, Shaban F et al (2018) Perforated sigmoid diverticulitis: Hartmann’s procedure or resection with primary anastomosis-a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised control trials. Tech Coloproctol 22(10):743–753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-018-1819-9
doi: 10.1007/s10151-018-1819-9
pubmed: 29995173
Hall J, Hardiman K, Lee S et al (2020) The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the treatment of left-sided colonic diverticulitis. Dis Colon Rectum 63:728–747. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000001679
doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001679
pubmed: 32384404
Nikolian VC, Kamdar NS, Regenbogen SE et al (2017) Anastomotic leak after colorectal resection: a population-based study of risk factors and hospital variation. Surgery 161(6):1619–1627
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.12.033
Murray AC, Chiuzan C, Kiran RP (2016) Risk of anastomotic leak after laparoscopic versus open colectomy. Surg Endosc 30(12):5275–5282
doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4875-0
Midura EF, Hanseman D, Davis BR et al (2015) Risk factors and consequences of anastomotic leak after colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 58(3):333–338. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000249
doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000249
pubmed: 25664712
Rullier E, Laurent C, Garrelon JL, Michel P, Saric J, Parneix M (1998) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 85:355–358. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00615.x
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00615.x
pubmed: 9529492
Alves A, Panis Y, Pocard M et al (1999) Management of anastomotic leakage after nondiverted large bowel resection. J Am Coll Surg 189:554–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1072-7515(99)00207-0
doi: 10.1016/S1072-7515(99)00207-0
pubmed: 10589591
Eckmann C, Kujath P, Schiedeck THK et al (2004) Anastomotic leakage following low anterior resection: results of a standardized diagnostic and therapeutic approach. Int J Colorectal Dis 19:128–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-003-0498-8
doi: 10.1007/s00384-003-0498-8
pubmed: 14752675
Kang CY, Halabi WJ, Chaudhry OO et al (2013) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer. JAMA Surg 148(1):65–71. https://doi.org/10.1001/2013.jamasurg.2
doi: 10.1001/2013.jamasurg.2
pubmed: 22986932
Leester B, Asztalos I, Polnyib C (2002) Septic complications after low anterior rectal resection—is diverting stoma still justified? Acta Chir Iugosl 49(2):67–71
doi: 10.2298/ACI0202067L
Matthiessen P, Hallböök O, Rutegård J, Simert G, Sjödahl R (2007) Defunctioning stoma reduces symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer: a randomized multicenter trial. Ann Surg 246(2):207–214. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3180603024
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3180603024
pubmed: 17667498
pmcid: 1933561
Shaban F, Carney K, McGarry K, Holtham S (2018) Perforated diverticulitis: to anastomose or not to anastomose? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 58:11–21
doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.08.009
Sparreboom CL, van Groningen JT, Lingsma HF et al (2018) Different risk factors for early and late colorectal anastomotic leakage in a nationwide audit. Dis Colon Rectum 61(11):1258–1266
doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001202
Hanna MH, Vinci A, Pigazzi A (2015) Diverting ileostomy in colorectal surgery: when is it necessary? Langenbecks Arch Surg 400:145–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-015-1275-1
doi: 10.1007/s00423-015-1275-1
pubmed: 25633276
Ondrula DP, Nelson RL, Prasad ML et al (1992) Multifactorial index of preoperative risk factors in colon resections. Dis Colon Rectum 35:117–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02050665
doi: 10.1007/BF02050665
pubmed: 1735312
McKenna NP, Bews KA, Cima RR et al (2020) Development of a risk score to predict anastomotic leak after left-sided colectomy: which patients warrant diversion? J Gastrointest Surg 24:132–143
doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04293-y
Boyce SA, Harris C, Stevenson A, Lumley J, Clark D (2017) Management of low colorectal anastomotic leakage in the laparoscopic era: more than a decade of experience. Dis Colon Rectum 60(8):807–814. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000822
doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000822
pubmed: 28682966
Cauley CE, Ruchin BS, Bordeianou L (2018) Use of primary anastomosis with diverting ileostomy in patients with acute diverticulitis requiring urgent operative intervention. Dis Col Rectum 61(5):586–592
doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001080
Baucom RB, Poulose BK, Herline AJ et al (2015) Smoking as a dominant risk factor for anastomotic leak after left colon resection. Am J Surgery 210(1):1–5
doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.10.033
Richards CH, Campbell V, Ho C et al (2012) Smoking is a major risk factor for anastomotic leak in patients undergoing low anterior resection. Colorect Dis 14(5):628–633
doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02718.x
Alves A, Panis Y, Trancart D, Regimbeau JM, Pocard M, Valleur P (2002) Factors associated with clinically significant anastomotic leakage after large bowel resection: multivariate analysis of 707 patients. World J Surg 26(4):499–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-001-0256-4
doi: 10.1007/s00268-001-0256-4
pubmed: 11910487
Phan K, Oh L, Ctercteko G et al (2019) Does a stoma reduce the risk of anastomotic leak and need for re-operation following low anterior resection for rectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Gastrointest Oncol 10(2):179–187. https://doi.org/10.21037/jgo.2018.11.07
doi: 10.21037/jgo.2018.11.07
pubmed: 31032083
pmcid: 6465490
Hawkins AT, Dharmarajan S, Wells KK et al (2016) Does diverting loop ileostomy improve outcomes following open ileo-colic anastomoses? A Nationwide Analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 20:1738–1743
doi: 10.1007/s11605-016-3230-z