Research Self-Efficacy and Productivity in Communication Sciences and Disorders Faculty.
faculty
productivity
research self-efficacy
Journal
Journal of communication disorders
ISSN: 1873-7994
Titre abrégé: J Commun Disord
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0260316
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
received:
18
09
2020
revised:
05
04
2021
accepted:
08
04
2021
pubmed:
29
5
2021
medline:
16
10
2021
entrez:
28
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In the field of Communication Sciences and Disorders (CSD) emphasis is placed on advancing research to inform evidence based practice. However, there is little information about the research support and productivity of current faculty members in the discipline. The aims of this study are: to describe the resources and workload of faculty at different types of institutions; to examine whether self-perception of research self-efficacy differs between faculty across institution types; and to investigate whether self-efficacy, institutional factors, or workload characteristics predict research productivity. CSD faculty (N = 144) completed an online survey about their institutions, departments, and research resources. Respondents rated their research self-efficacy using the Quantitative and/or Qualitative Research Self Efficacy Inventory. Total Research Productivity was tallied using the Total Research Productivity Index. Responses were analyzed according to the respondent institution's Carnegie Classification and faculty rank to provide a more comprehensive picture of faculty experiences at different kinds of institutions. Faculty across institution types are equally confident in their research abilities and their confidence is related to similar tasks overall. Departmental resources for research are aligned with Carnegie Classifications of institutions. Faculty at research-focused institutions showed overall higher research productivity but also reported spending similar time on departmental service and teaching. Research productivity was predicted by Carnegie Classification and time spent in advisement and clinic supervision. Limited opportunities for doctoral funding and engagement of post-doctoral research fellows were noted. The results of this study further our understanding of the resources and limitations for research in different types of programs that offer CSD degrees. This information is necessary to inform policy decisions regarding academic careers in CSD, provide context for students considering an academic career, and enhance the research productivity of the field.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34049086
pii: S0021-9924(21)00030-7
doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2021.106107
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
106107Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.