Research Self-Efficacy and Productivity in Communication Sciences and Disorders Faculty.


Journal

Journal of communication disorders
ISSN: 1873-7994
Titre abrégé: J Commun Disord
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0260316

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Historique:
received: 18 09 2020
revised: 05 04 2021
accepted: 08 04 2021
pubmed: 29 5 2021
medline: 16 10 2021
entrez: 28 5 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

In the field of Communication Sciences and Disorders (CSD) emphasis is placed on advancing research to inform evidence based practice. However, there is little information about the research support and productivity of current faculty members in the discipline. The aims of this study are: to describe the resources and workload of faculty at different types of institutions; to examine whether self-perception of research self-efficacy differs between faculty across institution types; and to investigate whether self-efficacy, institutional factors, or workload characteristics predict research productivity. CSD faculty (N = 144) completed an online survey about their institutions, departments, and research resources. Respondents rated their research self-efficacy using the Quantitative and/or Qualitative Research Self Efficacy Inventory. Total Research Productivity was tallied using the Total Research Productivity Index. Responses were analyzed according to the respondent institution's Carnegie Classification and faculty rank to provide a more comprehensive picture of faculty experiences at different kinds of institutions. Faculty across institution types are equally confident in their research abilities and their confidence is related to similar tasks overall. Departmental resources for research are aligned with Carnegie Classifications of institutions. Faculty at research-focused institutions showed overall higher research productivity but also reported spending similar time on departmental service and teaching. Research productivity was predicted by Carnegie Classification and time spent in advisement and clinic supervision. Limited opportunities for doctoral funding and engagement of post-doctoral research fellows were noted. The results of this study further our understanding of the resources and limitations for research in different types of programs that offer CSD degrees. This information is necessary to inform policy decisions regarding academic careers in CSD, provide context for students considering an academic career, and enhance the research productivity of the field.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34049086
pii: S0021-9924(21)00030-7
doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2021.106107
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

106107

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Melissa Randazzo (M)

Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Adelphi University, Garden City, NY 11530. Electronic address: mrandazzo@adelphi.edu.

Ryan Priefer (R)

Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Adelphi University, Garden City, NY 11530.

Rubini Pasupathy (R)

Julia Jones Matthews Department of Public Health, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX 79424.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH