Key considerations in planning and designing programmatic assessment in competency-based medical education.

Assessment (general) assessment (clinical) phase of education (general) profession (General) profession (Medicine)

Journal

Medical teacher
ISSN: 1466-187X
Titre abrégé: Med Teach
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7909593

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jul 2021
Historique:
pubmed: 2 6 2021
medline: 3 9 2021
entrez: 1 6 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Programmatic assessment as a concept is still novel for many in clinical education, and there may be a disconnect between the academics who publish about programmatic assessment and the front-line clinical educators who must put theory into practice. In this paper, we clearly define programmatic assessment and present high-level guidelines about its implementation in competency-based medical education (CBME) programs. The guidelines are informed by literature and by lessons learned from established programmatic assessment approaches. We articulate five steps to consider when implementing programmatic assessment in CBME contexts: articulate the purpose of the program of assessment, determine what must be assessed, choose tools fit for purpose, consider the stakes of assessments, and define processes for interpreting assessment data. In the process, we seek to offer a helpful guide or template for front-line clinical educators. We dispel some myths about programmatic assessment to help training programs as they look to design-or redesign-programs of assessment. In particular, we highlight the notion that programmatic assessment is not 'one size fits all'; rather, it is a system of assessment that results when shared common principles are considered and applied by individual programs as they plan and design their own bespoke model of programmatic assessment for CBME in their unique context.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34061700
doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2021.1925099
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

758-764

Auteurs

Shelley Ross (S)

Department of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Canadian Association for Medical Education, Edmonton, Canada.

Karen E Hauer (KE)

University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Keith Wycliffe-Jones (K)

Department of Family Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.

Andrew K Hall (AK)

Department of Emergency Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.
Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, Ottawa, Canada.

Laura Molgaard (L)

University of Minnesota College of Veterinary Medicine, St. Paul, MIN, USA.

Denyse Richardson (D)

Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, Ottawa, Canada.
Division of Physiatry, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Anna Oswald (A)

Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, Ottawa, Canada.
Department of Medicine and CBME lead for the Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

Farhan Bhanji (F)

Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, Ottawa, Canada.
Pediatrics at McGill University, Montreal, Canada.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH