Starting Imatinib at 400 mg Daily in Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Harboring KIT Exon 9 Mutations: A Retrospective, Multicenter Study.


Journal

Targeted oncology
ISSN: 1776-260X
Titre abrégé: Target Oncol
Pays: France
ID NLM: 101270595

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 2021
Historique:
accepted: 22 05 2021
pubmed: 6 6 2021
medline: 19 1 2022
entrez: 5 6 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Retrospective analyses suggest that patients with advanced KIT exon 9-mutated gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) receiving imatinib 800 mg (rather than 400 mg) daily have better outcomes. In the adjuvant setting, the question of the optimal dose of imatinib remains unsettled. We aimed to retrospectively assess the activity of imatinib 400 mg in both the adjuvant and the advanced settings. We performed a multicenter study of patients with KIT exon 9-mutated GIST starting imatinib at 400 mg daily. We examined the relapse-free survival (RFS) among high-risk patients either receiving or not receiving adjuvant imatinib. In patients with advanced disease, progression-free survival (PFS, progression under imatinib 400 mg), time to imatinib failure (TIF, progression under imatinib 400, then 800 mg upon first progression), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. In the post-operative setting (n = 37), 20 patients received adjuvant imatinib. Median RFS in high-risk patients receiving adjuvant imatinib (n = 14) was not reached (95% CI 17.5-46.6) versus 13.6 months (95% CI 4.7-13.6) for those who did not (p = 0.37), after a median follow-up of 58 months. RFS at 36 months was 63% (30.3-96.6) versus 40% (95% CI 0-82.9), p = 0.2. In advanced disease (n = 28), median PFS, TIF and OS were 12.7 months (95% CI 6.1-18.2), 21.0 months (95% CI 17.4-28.1) and 47.0 months (95% CI 33.5-69.2), respectively. Despite the limitations of a retrospective analysis and the small number of patients, the benefit of adjuvant imatinib 400 mg daily in high-risk patients appeared relevant. Patients with advanced disease receiving imatinib 400 mg with subsequent dose escalation had a TIF similar to that observed with an initial dose of 800 mg. Intra-patient dose escalation in this setting might be an option.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Retrospective analyses suggest that patients with advanced KIT exon 9-mutated gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) receiving imatinib 800 mg (rather than 400 mg) daily have better outcomes. In the adjuvant setting, the question of the optimal dose of imatinib remains unsettled.
OBJECTIVE
We aimed to retrospectively assess the activity of imatinib 400 mg in both the adjuvant and the advanced settings.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
We performed a multicenter study of patients with KIT exon 9-mutated GIST starting imatinib at 400 mg daily. We examined the relapse-free survival (RFS) among high-risk patients either receiving or not receiving adjuvant imatinib. In patients with advanced disease, progression-free survival (PFS, progression under imatinib 400 mg), time to imatinib failure (TIF, progression under imatinib 400, then 800 mg upon first progression), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed.
RESULTS
In the post-operative setting (n = 37), 20 patients received adjuvant imatinib. Median RFS in high-risk patients receiving adjuvant imatinib (n = 14) was not reached (95% CI 17.5-46.6) versus 13.6 months (95% CI 4.7-13.6) for those who did not (p = 0.37), after a median follow-up of 58 months. RFS at 36 months was 63% (30.3-96.6) versus 40% (95% CI 0-82.9), p = 0.2. In advanced disease (n = 28), median PFS, TIF and OS were 12.7 months (95% CI 6.1-18.2), 21.0 months (95% CI 17.4-28.1) and 47.0 months (95% CI 33.5-69.2), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
Despite the limitations of a retrospective analysis and the small number of patients, the benefit of adjuvant imatinib 400 mg daily in high-risk patients appeared relevant. Patients with advanced disease receiving imatinib 400 mg with subsequent dose escalation had a TIF similar to that observed with an initial dose of 800 mg. Intra-patient dose escalation in this setting might be an option.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34089444
doi: 10.1007/s11523-021-00820-7
pii: 10.1007/s11523-021-00820-7
doi:

Substances chimiques

Protein Kinase Inhibitors 0
Imatinib Mesylate 8A1O1M485B

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

485-492

Références

Corless CL, Heinrich MC. Molecular pathobiology of gastrointestinal stromal sarcomas. Annu Rev Pathol. 2008;3:557–86.
doi: 10.1146/annurev.pathmechdis.3.121806.151538
Joensuu H, Hohenberger P, Corless CL. Gastrointestinal stromal tumour. Lancet. 2013;382:973–83.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60106-3
Nannini M, Biasco G, Astolfi A, Pantaleo M. An overview on molecular biology of KIT/PDGFRA wild type (WT) gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST). J Med Genet. 2013;50:653–61.
doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2013-101695
Demetri GD, von Mehren M, Blanke CD, Van den Abbeele AD, Eisenberg B, Roberts PJ, et al. Efficacy and safety of imatinib mesylate in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:472–80.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa020461
Blanke CD, Demetri GD, von Mehren M, Heinrich MC, Eisenberg B, Fletcher JA, et al. Long-term results from a randomized phase II trial of standard—versus higher—dose of imatinib of mesylate for patients with unresectable or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors expressing KIT. J Clin Oncol. 2009;26:620–5.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.4403
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Meta-Analysis Group (MetaGIST). Comparison of two doses of imatinib for the treatment of unresectable or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a meta-analysis of 1640 patients. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:1247–53.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.24.2099
Patrikidou A, Dômont J, Chabaud S, Ray-Coquard I, Coindre JM, Bui-Nguyen B, et al. Long-term outcome of molecular subgroups of GIST patients treated with standard-dose imatinib in the BFR14 trial of the French Sarcoma Group. Eur J Cancer. 2016;52:173–80.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.10.069
Blay JY, Shen L, Kang YK, Rutkowski P, Qin S, Nosov D, et al. Nilotinib vs imatinib as first-line therapy or patients with unresectable or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors: randomized phase 3 trial results and subgroup analysis of molecular subtypes. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:550–60.
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70105-1
Dematteo R, Ballman KV, Antonescu CR, Maki RG, Pisters PWT, Demetri GD, et al. Adjuvant imatinib mesylate after resection of localized, primary gastrointestinal stromal tumour: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2009;373:1097–104.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60500-6
Corless CL, Ballman KV, Antonescu CR, Kolesnikova V, Maki RG, Pisters PWT, et al. Pathologic and molecular features correlate with long-term outcome after adjuvant therapy of resected primary GI stromal tumor: the ACOSOG Z9001 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:1563–70.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.51.2046
Casali PG, Le Cesne A, Velasco AP, Kotasek D, Rutkowski P, Hohenberger P, et al. Time to definitive failure to the first tyrosine kinase inhibitor in localized GI stromal tumors treated with imainib as an adjuvant. A European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group intergroup randomized trial in collaboration with the Australasian Gastroinstestinal Trials Group, UNICANCER, French Sarcoma Group, Italian Sarcoma Group and Spanish Group for Research on Sarcomas. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:4276–83.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.62.4304
Joensuu H, Eriksson M, Sundby Hall K, Hartmann JT, Pink D, Schütte J, et al. One versus three years of adjuvant imatinib for operable gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2012;307:1265–72.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.347
Miettinen M, Majidi M, Lasota J. Pathology and diagnostic criteria of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs): a review. Eur J Cancer. 2002;38(Suppl 5):S39-51.
doi: 10.1016/S0959-8049(02)80602-5
Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:228–47.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026
Casali PG, Abecassis N, Aro HT, Bauer S, Biagini R, Bielack S, et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: ESMO–EURACAN Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2018;29(Suppl 4):iv68–78.
doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy095
Joenssu H, Eriksson M, Sundby Hall K, Reichardt A, Hartmann JT, Pink S, et al. Adjuvant imatinib for high-risk GI stromal tumor: analysis of a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2015;34:244–50.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.62.9170
Verweij J, Casali PG, Zalcberg J, Le Cesne A, Reichardt P, Blay JY, et al. Progression-free survival in gastrointestinal stromal tumors with high-dose imatinib: randomized trial. Lancet. 2004;364:1127–34.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17098-0
Gronchi A, Blay JY, Trent JC. The role of high dose imatinib in the management of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Cancer. 2010;116:1847–58.
doi: 10.1002/cncr.24944

Auteurs

Almudena Callejo (A)

Department of Medical Oncology, Cruces University Hospital, Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain.

Sara Faouzi (S)

Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.

Olivier Bouché (O)

Department of Digestive Oncology, CHU Robert Debré, Reims, France.

François Bertucci (F)

Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France.

Thomas Chevalier (T)

Department of Medical Oncology, CHU La Timone, Marseille, France.

Nicolas Isambert (N)

Department of Medical Oncology, Pôle Régional de Cancérologie, CHU de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.

Florence Duffaud (F)

Department of Medical Oncology, CHU La Timone, Marseille, France.
Aix Marseille University (AMU), Marseille, France.

Olivier Collard (O)

Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de la Loire, Lucien Neuwirth, St Priest en Jarez, France.

Nicolas Penel (N)

Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France.
Medical School, Lille University, Lille, France.

Philippe Terrier (P)

Department of Pathology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.

Olivier Mir (O)

Department of Ambulatory Cancer Care, Gustave Roussy, 114, rue Edouard Vaillant, 94800, Villejuif, France. olivier.mir@gustaveroussy.fr.

Jean Yves Blay (JY)

Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France.
Université Claude Bernard & LYRICAN (INCA-DGOS-INSERM 12563), Lyon, France.

Axel Le Cesne (A)

Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH