Perturbation of ribosomal subunit dynamics by inhibitors of tRNA translocation.
Anti-Bacterial Agents
/ pharmacology
Biological Transport
Cinnamates
/ pharmacology
Escherichia coli
/ drug effects
Hygromycin B
/ analogs & derivatives
Kanamycin
/ pharmacology
Kinetics
Neomycin
/ pharmacology
Paromomycin
/ pharmacology
Peptide Elongation Factor G
/ genetics
Protein Biosynthesis
/ drug effects
RNA, Messenger
/ chemistry
RNA, Transfer
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Ribosome Subunits
/ drug effects
Spectinomycin
/ pharmacology
Streptomycin
/ pharmacology
Viomycin
/ pharmacology
EF-G
antibiotics
rapid kinetics
ribosome head domain swiveling
ribosome subunit rotation
translation elongation
Journal
RNA (New York, N.Y.)
ISSN: 1469-9001
Titre abrégé: RNA
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9509184
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2021
09 2021
Historique:
received:
23
03
2021
accepted:
03
06
2021
pubmed:
13
6
2021
medline:
1
10
2021
entrez:
12
6
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Many antibiotics that bind to the ribosome inhibit translation by blocking the movement of tRNAs and mRNA or interfering with ribosome dynamics, which impairs the formation of essential translocation intermediates. Here we show how translocation inhibitors viomycin (Vio), neomycin (Neo), paromomycin (Par), kanamycin (Kan), spectinomycin (Spc), hygromycin B (HygB), and streptomycin (Str, an antibiotic that does not inhibit tRNA movement), affect principal motions of the small ribosomal subunits (SSU) during EF-G-promoted translocation. Using ensemble kinetics, we studied the SSU body domain rotation and SSU head domain swiveling in real time. We show that although antibiotics binding to the ribosome can favor a particular ribosome conformation in the absence of EF-G, their kinetic effect on the EF-G-induced transition to the rotated/swiveled state of the SSU is moderate. The antibiotics mostly inhibit backward movements of the SSU body and/or the head domains. Vio, Spc, and high concentrations of Neo completely inhibit the backward movements of the SSU body and head domain. Kan, Par, HygB, and low concentrations of Neo slow down both movements, but their sequence and coordination are retained. Finally, Str has very little effect on the backward rotation of the SSU body domain, but retards the SSU head movement. The data underscore the importance of ribosome dynamics for tRNA-mRNA translocation and provide new insights into the mechanism of antibiotic action.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34117118
pii: rna.078758.121
doi: 10.1261/rna.078758.121
pmc: PMC8370747
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-Bacterial Agents
0
Cinnamates
0
Peptide Elongation Factor G
0
RNA, Messenger
0
Hygromycin B
3XQ2233B0B
hygromycin A
3YJY415DDI
Kanamycin
59-01-8
Paromomycin
61JJC8N5ZK
RNA, Transfer
9014-25-9
Spectinomycin
93AKI1U6QF
Neomycin
I16QD7X297
Streptomycin
Y45QSO73OB
Viomycin
YVU35998K5
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
981-990Informations de copyright
© 2021 Belardinelli et al.; Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press for the RNA Society.
Références
Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2009 Nov-Dec;44(6):393-433
pubmed: 19929179
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 May 12;117(19):10271-10277
pubmed: 32341159
Sci Adv. 2019 Dec 20;5(12):eaax8030
pubmed: 31903418
ACS Chem Biol. 2007 Aug 17;2(8):545-552
pubmed: 17696316
RNA. 2008 Aug;14(8):1590-9
pubmed: 18567815
Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010 Mar;17(3):289-93
pubmed: 20154709
Biochemistry. 1979 Apr 17;18(8):1570-4
pubmed: 371679
Eur J Biochem. 1977 Dec;81(3):491-7
pubmed: 202460
Mol Cell. 2008 Jun 6;30(5):578-88
pubmed: 18538656
Nat Chem Biol. 2010 Jan;6(1):54-62
pubmed: 19946275
Nat Commun. 2015 Jul 30;6:7896
pubmed: 26224058
Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 5;7(1):10536
pubmed: 28874811
RNA Biol. 2016 Dec;13(12):1197-1203
pubmed: 27801619
Science. 2006 Sep 29;313(5795):1935-42
pubmed: 16959973
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Mar 14;92(6):1945-9
pubmed: 7892205
Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2012 Sep;19(9):957-63
pubmed: 22902368
J Biol Chem. 2015 Feb 6;290(6):3440-54
pubmed: 25451927
Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010 Jul;17(7):793-800
pubmed: 20562856
Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2012 Dec;22(6):804-14
pubmed: 23142574
Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2007 Aug;14(8):727-32
pubmed: 17660832
Biol Chem. 2019 Dec 18;401(1):131-142
pubmed: 31600135
Nat Commun. 2013;4:1355
pubmed: 23322043
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1979 Apr 13;87(3):960-6
pubmed: 378226
EMBO J. 2014 May 2;33(9):1073-85
pubmed: 24614227
Mol Cell. 2007 Feb 23;25(4):519-29
pubmed: 17317625
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Dec 24;110(52):20964-9
pubmed: 24324168
Translation (Austin). 2013 Apr 01;1(1):e24315
pubmed: 26824016
J Mol Biol. 2007 Jul 13;370(3):530-40
pubmed: 17512008
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1976 Jul 26;71(2):477-83
pubmed: 183772
Science. 2014 Sep 5;345(6201):1188-91
pubmed: 25190797
Cell Rep. 2013 Feb 21;3(2):497-508
pubmed: 23416053
Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2016 Apr;23(4):333-41
pubmed: 26926435
Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2017 Dec 7;24(12):1021-1027
pubmed: 29215639
Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2007 Jun;14(6):493-7
pubmed: 17515906
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2014 Jan;12(1):35-48
pubmed: 24336183
Q Rev Biophys. 2017 Jan;50:e12
pubmed: 29233224
Cell Rep. 2016 Aug 23;16(8):2187-2196
pubmed: 27524615
Elife. 2020 Sep 14;9:
pubmed: 32924932
RNA. 2007 Sep;13(9):1473-82
pubmed: 17630323
Annu Rev Biochem. 2005;74:649-79
pubmed: 16180279
Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2016 Apr;23(4):342-8
pubmed: 26999556
J Mol Biol. 2012 Mar 2;416(4):571-8
pubmed: 22240456
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Sep 16;111(37):13325-30
pubmed: 25187561
Mol Cell. 2003 Jun;11(6):1517-23
pubmed: 12820965
J Mol Biol. 2004 Nov 5;343(5):1183-94
pubmed: 15491605
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Oct 21;111(42):15060-5
pubmed: 25288752
Nature. 2000 Sep 21;407(6802):340-8
pubmed: 11014183
Structure. 2001 Aug;9(8):647-58
pubmed: 11587639
Nature. 1997 Jan 2;385(6611):37-41
pubmed: 8985244
RNA. 2019 Feb;25(2):247-254
pubmed: 30413565