Association of medically assisted reproduction with offspring cord blood DNA methylation across cohorts.
ALSPAC
CHART
DNA methylation
IVF
MoBa
assisted reproductive technology
epigenetics
medically assisted reproduction
Journal
Human reproduction (Oxford, England)
ISSN: 1460-2350
Titre abrégé: Hum Reprod
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8701199
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 07 2021
19 07 2021
Historique:
received:
18
06
2020
revised:
16
04
2021
pubmed:
18
6
2021
medline:
12
8
2021
entrez:
17
6
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Is cord blood DNA methylation associated with having been conceived by medically assisted reproduction? This study does not provide strong evidence of an association of conception by medically assisted reproduction with variation in infant blood cell DNA methylation. Medically assisted reproduction consists of procedures used to help infertile/subfertile couples conceive, including ART. Due to its importance in gene regulation during early development programming, DNA methylation and its perturbations associated with medically assisted reproduction could reveal new insights into the biological effects of assisted reproductive technologies and potential adverse offspring outcomes. We investigated the association of DNA methylation and medically assisted reproduction using a case-control study design (N = 205 medically assisted reproduction cases and N = 2439 naturally conceived controls in discovery cohorts; N = 149 ART cases and N = 58 non-ART controls in replication cohort). We assessed the association between medically assisted reproduction and DNA methylation at birth in cord blood (205 medically assisted conceptions and 2439 naturally conceived controls) at >450 000 CpG sites across the genome in two sub-samples of the UK Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) and two sub-samples of the Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study (MoBa) by meta-analysis. We explored replication of findings in the Australian Clinical review of the Health of adults conceived following Assisted Reproductive Technologies (CHART) study (N = 149 ART conceptions and N = 58 controls). The ALSPAC and MoBa meta-analysis revealed evidence of association between conception by medically assisted reproduction and DNA methylation (false-discovery-rate-corrected P-value < 0.05) at five CpG sites which are annotated to two genes (percentage difference in methylation per CpG, cg24051276: Beta = 0.23 (95% CI 0.15,0.31); cg00012522: Beta = 0.47 (95% CI 0.31, 0.63); cg17855264: Beta = 0.31 (95% CI 0.20, 0.43); cg17132421: Beta = 0.30 (95% CI 0.18, 0.42); cg18529845: Beta = 0.41 (95% CI 0.25, 0.57)). Methylation at three of these sites has been previously linked to cancer, aging, HIV infection and neurological diseases. None of these associations replicated in the CHART cohort. There was evidence of a functional role of medically assisted reproduction-induced hypermethylation at CpG sites located within regulatory regions as shown by putative transcription factor binding and chromatin remodelling. While insufficient power is likely, heterogeneity in types of medically assisted reproduction procedures and between populations may also contribute. Larger studies might identify replicable variation in DNA methylation at birth due to medically assisted reproduction. Newborns conceived with medically assisted procedures present with divergent DNA methylation in cord blood white cells. If these associations are true and causal, they might have long-term consequences for offspring health. This study has been supported by the US National Institute of Health (R01 DK10324), the European Research Council under the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013)/ERC Grant agreement no. 669545, European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Grant agreement no. 733206 (LifeCycle) and the NIHR Biomedical Centre at the University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol. The UK Medical Research Council and Wellcome (Grant ref: 102215/2/13/2) and the University of Bristol provide core support for ALSPAC. Methylation data in the ALSPAC cohort were generated as part of the UK BBSRC funded (BB/I025751/1 and BB/I025263/1) Accessible Resource for Integrated Epigenomic Studies (ARIES, http://www.ariesepigenomics.org.uk). D.C., J.J., C.L.R. D.A.L and H.R.E. work in a Unit that is supported by the University of Bristol and the UK Medical Research Council (Grant nos. MC_UU_00011/1, MC_UU_00011/5 and MC_UU_00011/6). B.N. is supported by an NHMRC (Australia) Investigator Grant (1173314). ALSPAC GWAS data were generated by Sample Logistics and Genotyping Facilities at Wellcome Sanger Institute and LabCorp (Laboratory Corporation of America) using support from 23andMe. The Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study is supported by the Norwegian Ministry of Health and Care Services and the Ministry of Education and Research, NIH/NIEHS (Contract no. N01-ES-75558), NIH/NINDS (Grant nos. (i) UO1 NS 047537-01 and (ii) UO1 NS 047537-06A1). For this work, MoBa 1 and 2 were supported by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (Z01-ES-49019) and the Norwegian Research Council/BIOBANK (Grant no. 221097). This work was partly supported by the Research Council of Norway through its Centres of Excellence funding scheme, Project no. 262700.D.A.L. has received support from national and international government and charity funders, as well as from Roche Diagnostics and Medtronic for research unrelated to this study. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest. N/A.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34136910
pii: 6301361
doi: 10.1093/humrep/deab137
pmc: PMC8289315
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, N.I.H., Intramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2403-2413Subventions
Organisme : Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
ID : BB/I025751/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_PC_19009
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UU_00011/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_PC_15018
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : R01 DK103246
Pays : United States
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : G9815508
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
ID : BB/I025263/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 102215/2/13/2
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UU_00011/5
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : U01 NS047537
Pays : United States
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UU_00011/6
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology.
Références
Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Aug;44(4):1181-90
pubmed: 25991711
Int J Epidemiol. 2006 Oct;35(5):1146-50
pubmed: 16926217
Science. 2019 Jan 18;363(6424):294-297
pubmed: 30606806
Mol Cell. 2019 Apr 4;74(1):8-18
pubmed: 30951652
Bioinformatics. 2016 Jan 15;32(2):286-8
pubmed: 26424855
J Med Genet. 2010 Jun;47(6):371-6
pubmed: 19948534
Reprod Health. 2017 Sep 20;14(1):117
pubmed: 28931409
Hum Mol Genet. 2009 Oct 15;18(20):3769-78
pubmed: 19605411
Fertil Steril. 2016 Sep 1;106(3):629-639.e10
pubmed: 27288894
Biol Reprod. 2012 May 10;86(5):143, 1-16
pubmed: 22278980
Environ Health Perspect. 2012 Oct;120(10):1425-31
pubmed: 22851337
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019 Jun;143(6):2062-2074
pubmed: 30579849
Development. 2004 Aug;131(15):3727-35
pubmed: 15240554
Fertil Steril. 2019 Jul;112(1):130-139
pubmed: 31003618
Hum Reprod. 2017 Aug 1;32(8):1761-1769
pubmed: 28575352
N Engl J Med. 2012 May 10;366(19):1803-13
pubmed: 22559061
Placenta. 2015 Oct;36(10):1100-5
pubmed: 26386650
Bioinformatics. 2013 Aug 1;29(15):1851-7
pubmed: 23732277
Bioinformatics. 2016 Feb 15;32(4):587-9
pubmed: 26508757
Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Feb;42(1):111-27
pubmed: 22507743
Nat Genet. 2000 May;25(1):25-9
pubmed: 10802651
Sci Rep. 2015 Dec 02;5:17311
pubmed: 26626153
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011 Jan;127(1):262-4, 264.e1
pubmed: 21094522
Biol Reprod. 2000 Jun;62(6):1526-35
pubmed: 10819752
Lancet. 2012 Feb 11;379(9815):521-7
pubmed: 22243709
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2010 Mar;88(3):137-43
pubmed: 20063307
Bioessays. 2017 Nov;39(11):
pubmed: 28940661
Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Feb;42(1):97-110
pubmed: 22507742
Genomics. 2011 Oct;98(4):288-95
pubmed: 21839163
Biol Reprod. 2010 Dec;83(6):938-50
pubmed: 20702853
Cell. 2007 May 18;129(4):823-37
pubmed: 17512414
Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 Jan 8;47(D1):D1005-D1012
pubmed: 30445434
Epigenetics. 2016 May 3;11(5):354-62
pubmed: 27019159
Bioinformatics. 2010 Sep 1;26(17):2190-1
pubmed: 20616382
Bioinformatics. 2018 Dec 1;34(23):3983-3989
pubmed: 29931280
Hum Mol Genet. 2010 Jan 1;19(1):36-51
pubmed: 19805400
Genome Med. 2017 Mar 24;9(1):28
pubmed: 28340599
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020 Jul;302(1):31-45
pubmed: 32445067
Int J Epidemiol. 2016 Apr;45(2):382-8
pubmed: 27063603
Hum Reprod. 2017 Sep 1;32(9):1786-1801
pubmed: 29117321
Clin Epigenetics. 2018 Jun 8;10:77
pubmed: 29930742
Clin Epigenetics. 2015 Apr 08;7:41
pubmed: 25901188
Hum Reprod Update. 2014 Nov-Dec;20(6):840-52
pubmed: 24961233
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016 Jun;33(6):711-7
pubmed: 27116010
J Dev Orig Health Dis. 2017 Aug;8(4):388-402
pubmed: 28416029
Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 Jan 4;45(D1):D331-D338
pubmed: 27899567
Hum Mol Genet. 2019 Feb 1;28(3):372-385
pubmed: 30239726
Hum Reprod Update. 2013 Jul-Aug;19(4):330-53
pubmed: 23449641
PLoS Med. 2011 Jan 04;8(1):e1000386
pubmed: 21245905
Bioinformatics. 2012 May 1;28(9):1280-1
pubmed: 22451269
Nat Commun. 2019 Sep 2;10(1):3922
pubmed: 31477727
Cryobiology. 2019 Apr;87:91-98
pubmed: 30707961
Genome Biol. 2012 Jun 15;13(6):R44
pubmed: 22703947
Genome Biol. 2016 Mar 31;17:61
pubmed: 27036880
Cell Rep. 2016 Nov 15;17(8):2137-2150
pubmed: 27851974
Birth Defects Res. 2018 May 1;110(8):625-629
pubmed: 29493111
Epigenetics. 2015;10(6):474-83
pubmed: 25580569