Second redo surgery after two consecutive failures of a colorectal or coloanal anastomosis: is it reasonable?
Chronic pelvic sepsis
Coloanal anastomosis
Colorectal anastomosis
Redo surgery
Journal
International journal of colorectal disease
ISSN: 1432-1262
Titre abrégé: Int J Colorectal Dis
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8607899
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2021
Sep 2021
Historique:
accepted:
16
06
2021
pubmed:
26
6
2021
medline:
11
8
2021
entrez:
25
6
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Colorectal redo surgery is well known to be a difficult procedure, associated with a high risk of failure. The aim of this study was to look into patients presenting two consecutive failed colorectal (CRA) or coloanal (CAA) anastomosis who underwent a second redo surgery (i.e., third anastomosis). A retrospective study based on a prospective database of second redo surgeries of CRA or CAA, in an expert center. Sixteen patients between 2005 and 2020 were analyzed. After a mean follow-up of 28 ± 26 months, success of surgery (defined as no stoma at the end of follow-up) was reported in 10/16 patients (63%). One patient with chronic anastomotic leakage and another with early colonic ischemia had no defunctioning stoma reversal. In the remaining four patients with a failed second redo surgery, a definitive stoma was ultimately created for fistula recurrence (n = 1), poor functional results (n = 2), or local cancer recurrence (n = 1). Two risk factors for failure of this second redo surgery were significantly found in a univariate analysis: (1) nature of the primary anastomosis: 3/13 s redo surgeries failed (23%) if a CRA was first made and 3/3 (100%) if it was a CAA (p = 0.036); (2) age: patients with a failed second redo surgery were older (p = 0.04). A 63% rate of success of second redo surgery was observed after two failed CRA or CAA. Although a demanding procedure, it can be proposed to carefully selected and motivated patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34169331
doi: 10.1007/s00384-021-03982-y
pii: 10.1007/s00384-021-03982-y
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2057-2060Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Lefevre JH, Bretagnol F, Maggiori L, Ferron M, Alves A, Panis Y (2011) Redo surgery for failed colorectal or coloanal anastomosis: a valuable surgical challenge. Surgery 149:65–71
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.03.017
Genser L, Manceau G, Karoui M, Breton S, Brevart C, Rousseau G, Vaillant JC, Hannoun L (2013) Postoperative and long-term outcomes after redo surgery for failed colorectal or coloanal anastomosis: retrospective analysis of 50 patients and review of the literature. Dis Colon Rectum 56:747–755
doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182853c44
Pitel S, Lefèvre JH, Tiret E, Chafai N, Parc Y (2012) Redo coloanal anastomosis: a retrospective study of 66 patients. Ann Surg 256:806–810. discussion 810–811
Schlegel RD, Dehni N, Parc R, Caplin S, Tiret E (2001) Results of reoperations in colorectal anastomotic strictures. Dis Colon Rectum 44:1464–1468
doi: 10.1007/BF02234598
Woo IT, Park JS, Choi GS, Park SY, Kim HJ, Park IK (2018) Clinical outcomes of a redo for a failed colorectal or coloanal anastomosis. Ann Coloproctol 34:259–265
doi: 10.3393/ac.2018.05.04
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213
doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae
von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP (2007) The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. The Lancet 370:1453–1457
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X
Deloyers L (1958) Technic permitting the easy assurance of continuity of the colon & conservation of sphincter after excision of the left transverse hemicolon & entire left colon; possible inclusion of rectum. J Chir (Paris) 75:147–155
Westerduin E, Klaver CEL, van Geloven AAW, Westerterp M, Bemelman WA, Tanis PJ (2018) Outcome after redo surgery for complicated colorectal and coloanal anastomosis: a systematic review. Dis Colon Rectum 61:988–998
doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001129
Maggiori L, Blanche J, Harnoy Y, Ferron M, Panis Y (2015) Redo-surgery by transanal colonic pull-through for failed anastomosis associated with chronic pelvic sepsis or rectovaginal fistula. Int J Colorectal Dis 30:543–548
doi: 10.1007/s00384-014-2119-0
Turnbull RB, Cuthbertson A (1961) Abdominorectal pull-through resection for cancer and for Hirschsprung’s disease. delayed posterior colorectal anastomosis. Cleve Clin Q 28:109–115
doi: 10.3949/ccjm.28.2.109
Cutait DE, Figliolini FJ (1961) A new method of colorectal anastomosis in abdominoperineal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 4:335–342
doi: 10.1007/BF02627230