The lysophospholipid-binding molecule CD1D is not required for the alloimmunization response to fresh or stored RBCs in mice despite RBC storage driving alterations in lysophospholipids.
Alarmins
/ blood
Animals
Antibody Specificity
Antigens, CD1d
/ genetics
Blood Preservation
Blood Transfusion
Duffy Blood-Group System
/ genetics
Erythrocytes
/ immunology
Female
Immunization
Immunoglobulin G
/ biosynthesis
Immunoglobulin M
/ biosynthesis
Isoantibodies
/ biosynthesis
Isoantigens
/ immunology
Lysophospholipids
/ blood
Male
Mass Spectrometry
Mice
Mice, Inbred Strains
Mice, Knockout
Mice, Transgenic
Muramidase
/ immunology
Ovalbumin
/ immunology
Receptors, Cell Surface
/ genetics
Transfusion Reaction
/ immunology
CD1D
lysophospholipids
red blood cell alloimmunization
storage
Journal
Transfusion
ISSN: 1537-2995
Titre abrégé: Transfusion
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0417360
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2021
07 2021
Historique:
revised:
08
04
2021
received:
07
12
2020
accepted:
09
04
2021
pubmed:
29
6
2021
medline:
14
8
2021
entrez:
28
6
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Despite the significant adverse clinical consequences of RBC alloimmunization, our understanding of the signals that induce immune responses to transfused RBCs remains incomplete. Though RBC storage has been shown to enhance alloimmunization in the hen egg lysozyme, ovalbumin, and human Duffy (HOD) RBC alloantigen mouse model, the molecular signals leading to immune activation in this system remain unclear. Given that the nonclassical major histocompatibility complex (MHC) Class I molecule CD1D can bind to multiple different lysophospholipids and direct immune activation, we hypothesized that storage of RBCs increases lysophospholipids known to bind CD1D, and further that recipient CD1D recognition of these altered lipids mediates storage-induced alloimmunization responses. We used a mass spectrometry-based approach to analyze the changes in lysophospholipids that are induced during storage of mouse RBCs. CD1D knockout (CD1D-KO) and wild-type (WT) control mice were transfused with stored HOD RBCs to measure the impact of CD1D deficiency on RBC alloimmunization. RBC storage results in alterations in multiple lysophospholipid species known to bind to CD1D and activate the immune system. Prior to transfusion, CD1D-deficient mice had lower baseline levels of polyclonal immunoglobulin (IgG) relative to WT mice. In response to stored RBC transfusion, CD1D-deficient mice generated similar levels of anti-HOD IgM and anti-HOD IgG. Although storage of RBCs leads to alteration of several lysophospholipids known to be capable of binding CD1D, storage-induced RBC alloimmunization responses are not impacted by recipient CD1D deficiency.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Despite the significant adverse clinical consequences of RBC alloimmunization, our understanding of the signals that induce immune responses to transfused RBCs remains incomplete. Though RBC storage has been shown to enhance alloimmunization in the hen egg lysozyme, ovalbumin, and human Duffy (HOD) RBC alloantigen mouse model, the molecular signals leading to immune activation in this system remain unclear. Given that the nonclassical major histocompatibility complex (MHC) Class I molecule CD1D can bind to multiple different lysophospholipids and direct immune activation, we hypothesized that storage of RBCs increases lysophospholipids known to bind CD1D, and further that recipient CD1D recognition of these altered lipids mediates storage-induced alloimmunization responses.
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS
We used a mass spectrometry-based approach to analyze the changes in lysophospholipids that are induced during storage of mouse RBCs. CD1D knockout (CD1D-KO) and wild-type (WT) control mice were transfused with stored HOD RBCs to measure the impact of CD1D deficiency on RBC alloimmunization.
RESULTS
RBC storage results in alterations in multiple lysophospholipid species known to bind to CD1D and activate the immune system. Prior to transfusion, CD1D-deficient mice had lower baseline levels of polyclonal immunoglobulin (IgG) relative to WT mice. In response to stored RBC transfusion, CD1D-deficient mice generated similar levels of anti-HOD IgM and anti-HOD IgG.
CONCLUSION
Although storage of RBCs leads to alteration of several lysophospholipids known to be capable of binding CD1D, storage-induced RBC alloimmunization responses are not impacted by recipient CD1D deficiency.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34181769
doi: 10.1111/trf.16554
pmc: PMC8856511
mid: NIHMS1772226
doi:
Substances chimiques
ACKR1 protein, human
0
Alarmins
0
Antigens, CD1d
0
CD1d antigen, mouse
0
Duffy Blood-Group System
0
Immunoglobulin G
0
Immunoglobulin M
0
Isoantibodies
0
Isoantigens
0
Lysophospholipids
0
Receptors, Cell Surface
0
Ovalbumin
9006-59-1
hen egg lysozyme
EC 3.2.1.-
Muramidase
EC 3.2.1.17
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2169-2178Subventions
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR001863
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA044579
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : P01 HL132819
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : R01 HL134691
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : R01 HL148151
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA044579
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2021 AABB.
Références
Front Immunol. 2018 Aug 28;9:1969
pubmed: 30210505
Transfusion. 2010 Mar;50(3):642-8
pubmed: 19906034
Am J Hematol. 2015 Aug;90(8):691-5
pubmed: 25963831
Transfusion. 2016 Oct;56(10):2560-2570
pubmed: 27514704
Transfusion. 2018 Aug;58(8):2003-2012
pubmed: 30171813
Haematologica. 2016 Nov;101(11):e440-e444
pubmed: 27662015
Methods. 2007 Nov;43(3):207-17
pubmed: 17920517
Cardiovasc Res. 2016 Feb 1;109(2):305-17
pubmed: 26604037
Curr Opin Immunol. 2020 Jun;64:124-129
pubmed: 32604057
Front Immunol. 2017 Sep 22;8:1178
pubmed: 29018445
Annu Rev Pathol. 2015;10:83-110
pubmed: 25621658
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2017 May;14(5):304-314
pubmed: 28127028
Transfusion. 2011 Dec;51(12):2549-54
pubmed: 21615744
Blood Transfus. 2019 Jan;17(1):27-52
pubmed: 30653459
Cell Host Microbe. 2011 Nov 17;10(5):437-50
pubmed: 22100160
J Exp Med. 2004 Feb 2;199(3):417-22
pubmed: 14744994
Nat Rev Immunol. 2020 Feb;20(2):95-112
pubmed: 31558839
Transfusion. 2014 Jan;54(1):137-48
pubmed: 23721209
Front Immunol. 2018 Jun 18;9:1360
pubmed: 29967611
Science. 2010 Jan 15;327(5963):291-5
pubmed: 20075244
Transfusion. 2011 Feb;51(2):435-41
pubmed: 21251006
Immunology. 2003 Dec;110(4):519-26
pubmed: 14632651
Blood. 2010 May 27;115(21):4284-92
pubmed: 20299509
J Exp Med. 2016 May 30;213(6):887-96
pubmed: 27185856
J Clin Invest. 1998 Apr 1;101(7):1458-67
pubmed: 9525989
Clin Immunol. 2015 Aug;159(2):128-33
pubmed: 25988859
Transfusion. 2014 Dec;54(12):3186-97
pubmed: 25041478
Transfusion. 2016 Jan;56(1):107-14
pubmed: 26509333
Semin Immunol. 2010 Apr;22(2):79-86
pubmed: 19948416
Transfusion. 2013 Nov;53(11):2795-800
pubmed: 23480520
J Immunol. 2014 Nov 1;193(9):4580-9
pubmed: 25261475
Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter. 2015 Sep-Oct;37(5):320-3
pubmed: 26408366
J Lab Clin Med. 1994 Nov;124(5):684-94
pubmed: 7964126
Cell. 2018 Jan 25;172(3):517-533.e20
pubmed: 29249358
Immunogenetics. 2016 Aug;68(8):611-22
pubmed: 27393663
J Leukoc Biol. 2017 Jan;101(1):261-273
pubmed: 27531930
Curr Opin Immunol. 2015 Jun;34:116-25
pubmed: 25805574
Blood. 2009 Sep 10;114(11):2315-22
pubmed: 19525479
Circ Res. 2011 Jan 21;108(2):235-48
pubmed: 21252151