Chromosome anchoring in Senegalese sole (Solea senegalensis) reveals sex-associated markers and genome rearrangements in flatfish.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 06 2021
29 06 2021
Historique:
received:
21
11
2020
accepted:
07
06
2021
entrez:
30
6
2021
pubmed:
1
7
2021
medline:
6
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The integration of physical and high-density genetic maps is a very useful approach to achieve chromosome-level genome assemblies. Here, the genome of a male Senegalese sole (Solea senegalensis) was de novo assembled and the contigs were anchored to a high-quality genetic map for chromosome-level scaffolding. Hybrid assembled genome was 609.3 Mb long and contained 3403 contigs with a N50 of 513 kb. The linkage map was constructed using 16,287 informative SNPs derived from ddRAD sequencing in 327 sole individuals from five families. Markers were assigned to 21 linkage groups with an average number of 21.9 markers per megabase. The anchoring of the physical to the genetic map positioned 1563 contigs into 21 pseudo-chromosomes covering 548.6 Mb. Comparison of genetic and physical distances indicated that the average genome-wide recombination rate was 0.23 cM/Mb and the female-to-male ratio 1.49 (female map length: 2,698.4 cM, male: 2,036.6 cM). Genomic recombination landscapes were different between sexes with crossovers mainly concentrated toward the telomeres in males while they were more uniformly distributed in females. A GWAS analysis using seven families identified 30 significant sex-associated SNP markers located in linkage group 18. The follicle-stimulating hormone receptor appeared as the most promising locus associated with sex within a region with very low recombination rates. An incomplete penetrance of sex markers with males as the heterogametic sex was determined. An interspecific comparison with other Pleuronectiformes genomes identified a high sequence similarity between homologous chromosomes, and several chromosomal rearrangements including a lineage-specific Robertsonian fusion in S. senegalensis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34188074
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-92601-5
pii: 10.1038/s41598-021-92601-5
pmc: PMC8242048
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
13460Références
Sci Data. 2020 Mar 12;7(1):90
pubmed: 32165614
Nat Genet. 2014 Mar;46(3):253-60
pubmed: 24487278
BMC Genomics. 2018 May 25;19(1):400
pubmed: 29801430
Genome Res. 2015 Nov;25(11):1750-6
pubmed: 26447147
Front Genet. 2019 Oct 16;10:991
pubmed: 31681425
J Biochem. 2018 Feb 1;163(2):97-103
pubmed: 29165574
Bioinformatics. 2007 May 15;23(10):1294-6
pubmed: 17384015
Chromosoma. 2017 Mar;126(2):261-277
pubmed: 27080536
Am Nat. 2020 Feb;195(2):361-379
pubmed: 32017625
DNA Res. 2015 Apr;22(2):161-70
pubmed: 25762582
Front Genet. 2014 Jul 07;5:208
pubmed: 25071835
Genome. 2017 May;60(5):441-453
pubmed: 28177835
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017 Dec 19;372(1736):
pubmed: 29109219
Bioinformatics. 2010 May 1;26(9):1145-51
pubmed: 20208069
Genetics. 2007 Oct;177(2):1193-205
pubmed: 17720928
BMC Genomics. 2020 Oct 21;21(1):732
pubmed: 33087060
Bioinformatics. 2013 Nov 1;29(21):2669-77
pubmed: 23990416
Nat Protoc. 2017 Dec;12(12):2640-2659
pubmed: 29189774
PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e52097
pubmed: 23284884
Bioinformatics. 2017 Dec 1;33(23):3726-3732
pubmed: 29036272
BMC Genomics. 2010 Oct 11;11:554
pubmed: 20937088
Mar Biotechnol (NY). 2015 Feb;17(1):8-22
pubmed: 25107689
BMC Genomics. 2018 Nov 14;19(1):818
pubmed: 30428854
DNA Res. 2016 Jun;23(3):181-92
pubmed: 26951068
Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 26;10(1):20654
pubmed: 33244091
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37135
pubmed: 22675423
iScience. 2020 Nov 30;24(1):101886
pubmed: 33354664
Nat Commun. 2017 Jan 31;8:14251
pubmed: 28139647
Biol Reprod. 2012 Aug 09;87(2):35
pubmed: 22649073
Mol Ecol Resour. 2016 May;16(3):655-61
pubmed: 26561199
Bioinformatics. 2018 Jan 15;34(2):306-307
pubmed: 28968706
Nat Genet. 2017 Jan;49(1):119-124
pubmed: 27918537
Bioinformatics. 2015 Oct 1;31(19):3210-2
pubmed: 26059717
Front Genet. 2018 Apr 17;9:127
pubmed: 29719550
Biol Reprod. 2010 Jun;82(6):1088-102
pubmed: 20200210
Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 20;9(1):17146
pubmed: 31748593
Bioinformatics. 2007 Aug 15;23(16):2188-9
pubmed: 17586550
G3 (Bethesda). 2018 May 31;8(6):1971-1983
pubmed: 29632132
G3 (Bethesda). 2020 Nov 5;10(11):4115-4128
pubmed: 32912931
Genetics. 2007 Dec;177(4):2457-67
pubmed: 18073440
PeerJ. 2018 Jun 4;6:e4958
pubmed: 29888139
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Oct 15;20(20):
pubmed: 31618912
Bioinformatics. 2018 Apr 1;34(7):1229-1231
pubmed: 29186362
J Exp Zool A Ecol Genet Physiol. 2011 Mar 1;315(3):162-9
pubmed: 21370485
Mar Environ Res. 2013 Sep;90:113-8
pubmed: 23850073
Bioinformatics. 2005 Sep 15;21(18):3674-6
pubmed: 16081474
Mol Biol Evol. 2002 Jan;19(1):68-75
pubmed: 11752191
DNA Res. 2018 Aug 1;25(4):439-450
pubmed: 29897548
Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 14;10(1):21905
pubmed: 33318526
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 16;10(3):e0120410
pubmed: 25775256
Nature. 2009 Oct 22;461(7267):1079-83
pubmed: 19783981
Am J Hum Genet. 2007 Sep;81(3):559-75
pubmed: 17701901
Genome Res. 2017 May;27(5):787-792
pubmed: 28130360
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jan 28;111(4):1427-32
pubmed: 24474769
Bioinformatics. 2020 Apr 15;36(8):2359-2364
pubmed: 31913460
Mol Biol Evol. 2018 Mar 1;35(3):543-548
pubmed: 29220515
Mol Ecol Resour. 2019 Nov;19(6):1461-1469
pubmed: 31325912