Teaching Children With Hearing Loss to Recognize Speech: Gains Made With Computer-Based Auditory and/or Speechreading Training.
Journal
Ear and hearing
ISSN: 1538-4667
Titre abrégé: Ear Hear
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8005585
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
pubmed:
6
7
2021
medline:
16
4
2022
entrez:
5
7
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Transfer appropriate processing (TAP) refers to a general finding that training gains are maximized when training and testing are conducted under the same conditions. The present study tested the extent to which TAP applies to speech perception training in children with hearing loss. Specifically, we assessed the benefits of computer-based speech perception training games for enhancing children's speech recognition by comparing three training groups: auditory training (AT), audiovisual training (AVT), and a combination of these two (AT/AVT). We also determined whether talker-specific training, as might occur when children train with the speech of a next year's classroom teacher, leads to better recognition of that talker's speech and if so, the extent to which training benefits generalize to untrained talkers. Consistent with TAP theory, we predicted that children would improve their ability to recognize the speech of the trained talker more than that of three untrained talkers and, depending on their training group, would improve more on an auditory-only (listening) or audiovisual (speechreading) speech perception assessment, that matched the type of training they received. We also hypothesized that benefit would generalize to untrained talkers and to test modalities in which they did not train, albeit to a lesser extent. Ninety-nine elementary school aged children with hearing loss were enrolled into a randomized control trial with a repeated measures A-A-B experimental mixed design in which children served as their own control for the assessment of overall benefit of a particular training type and three different groups of children yielded data for comparing the three types of training. We also assessed talker-specific learning and transfer of learning by including speech perception tests with stimuli spoken by the talker with whom a child trained and stimuli spoken by three talkers with whom the child did not train and by including speech perception tests that presented both auditory (listening) and audiovisual (speechreading) stimuli. Children received 16 hr of gamified training. The games provided word identification and connected speech comprehension training activities. Overall, children showed significant improvement in both their listening and speechreading performance. Consistent with TAP theory, children improved more on their trained talker than on the untrained talkers. Also consistent with TAP theory, the children who received AT improved more on the listening than the speechreading. However, children who received AVT improved on both types of assessment equally, which is not consistent with our predictions derived from a TAP perspective. Age, language level, and phonological awareness were either not predictive of training benefits or only negligibly so. The findings provide support for the practice of providing children who have hearing loss with structured speech perception training and suggest that future aural rehabilitation programs might include teacher-specific speech perception training to prepare children for an upcoming school year, especially since training will generalize to other talkers. The results also suggest that benefits of speech perception training were not significantly related to age, language level, or degree of phonological awareness. The findings are largely consistent with TAP theory, suggesting that the more aligned a training task is with the desired outcome, the more likely benefit will accrue.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34225318
doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001091
pii: 00003446-202201000-00017
pmc: PMC8712342
mid: NIHMS1709055
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
181-191Subventions
Organisme : NIDCD NIH HHS
ID : R01 DC014722
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Références
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 May 21;62(5):1574-1593
pubmed: 31039327
Ear Hear. 2020 Jul/Aug;41(4):705-719
pubmed: 32032226
J Am Acad Audiol. 2005 Jul-Aug;16(7):494-504
pubmed: 16295236
J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Jan;133(1):495-501
pubmed: 23297921
Int J Audiol. 2011 Nov;50(11):802-8
pubmed: 21929377
Am J Audiol. 2016 Oct 01;25(3S):308-312
pubmed: 27768194
Hear Res. 2016 Jul;337:89-95
pubmed: 27240480
Ear Hear. 2017 Jul/Aug;38(4):455-464
pubmed: 28085739
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2004 Apr;47(2):304-20
pubmed: 15157132
J Speech Hear Res. 1977 Mar;20(1):130-45
pubmed: 846196
J Am Acad Audiol. 2014 Nov-Dec;25(10):1008-21
pubmed: 25514453
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Oct;78(10):1624-31
pubmed: 25109453
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2015 Jun;58(3):1052-60
pubmed: 25812172
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2007 Oct;50(5):1157-65
pubmed: 17905902
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009 Jul;1169:195-8
pubmed: 19673780
Ear Hear. 1987 Oct;8(5):283-7
pubmed: 3678642
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997 Oct;40(5):1135-50
pubmed: 9328885
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2016 Aug 1;59(4):871-5
pubmed: 27567016
Br J Audiol. 1979 Aug;13(3):108-12
pubmed: 486816
Int J Audiol. 2008 Nov;47 Suppl 2:S31-7
pubmed: 19012110
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Jan;22(1):88-93
pubmed: 29371904
J Am Acad Audiol. 2014 Jun;25(6):549-61
pubmed: 25313545
Am J Audiol. 2013 Dec;22(2):335-8
pubmed: 23975126
Cochlear Implants Int. 2015 Sep;16 Suppl 3:S63-70
pubmed: 26561889
Front Psychol. 2013 May 14;4:263
pubmed: 23675364
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2011 Aug;54(4):1182-96
pubmed: 21173394
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2009 Jul;73(7):1043-52
pubmed: 19411117
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2016 Aug 1;59(4):862-70
pubmed: 27567015
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2000 Oct;26(5):1570-82
pubmed: 11039485
Ear Hear. 2007 Sep;28(5):656-68
pubmed: 17804980
Audiol Neurootol. 2007;12(5):307-12
pubmed: 17536199
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014 Apr 1;57(2):556-65
pubmed: 24129010