Occupational Inflexibility and Women's Employment During the Transition to Parenthood.
Employment
Gender
Occupations
Parenthood
Journal
Demography
ISSN: 1533-7790
Titre abrégé: Demography
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0226703
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 08 2021
01 08 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
13
7
2021
medline:
8
3
2022
entrez:
12
7
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The typical U.S. workplace has adapted little to changes in the family and remains bound to norms of a workweek of 40 or more hours. How jobs are structured and remunerated within occupations shapes gender inequality in the labor market, and this may be particularly true at the critical juncture of parenthood. This study provides novel evidence showing how the inflexibility of occupational work hours shapes new mothers' employment. We use a fixed-effects approach and individual-level data from nationally representative panels of the Survey of Income and Program Participation (N = 2,239 women) merged with occupational characteristics from the American Community Survey. We find that women in pre-birth occupations with higher shares working 40 or more hours per week and higher wage premiums to longer work hours are significantly less likely to be employed post-birth. These associations are small in magnitude and not statistically significant for men, and placebo regressions with childless women show no associations between occupational inflexibility and subsequent employment. Results illustrate how individual employment decisions are jointly constrained by the structure of the labor market and persistent gendered cultural norms about breadwinning and caregiving.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34251408
pii: 174062
doi: 10.1215/00703370-9373598
pmc: PMC8446331
mid: NIHMS1726343
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1249-1274Subventions
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : R01 HD091125
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 The Authors.
Références
RSF. 2016 Aug;2(4):34-70
pubmed: 30775444
Am Sociol Rev. 2015 Feb;80(1):116-139
pubmed: 26365994
Demography. 2017 Feb;54(1):93-118
pubmed: 28054253
Demography. 2000 Nov;37(4):401-14
pubmed: 11086567
Am Econ Rev. 2016 May;106(5):242-6
pubmed: 29547245
Demography. 2013 Dec;50(6):2255-77
pubmed: 24135861
AJS. 2012 Mar;117(5):1422-1459
pubmed: 26379287
Demography. 2009 May;46(2):341-69
pubmed: 21305397
Am Sociol Rev. 2014 Jun 1;79(3):485-516
pubmed: 25349460
Demography. 2019 Feb;56(1):285-320
pubmed: 30644043
J Marriage Fam. 2015 Jun;77(3):662-679
pubmed: 26430282
Soc Sci Res. 2016 Nov;60:266-282
pubmed: 27712684
Am Sociol Rev. 2016 Apr;81(2):262-289
pubmed: 27182069
AJS. 2011 May;116(6):1982-2018
pubmed: 21932472
Demography. 2016 Apr;53(2):365-91
pubmed: 27001314
AJS. 2014 Sep;120(2):395-431
pubmed: 25811068
Gend Soc. 2010 May 1;24(3):281-303
pubmed: 20625518
Am Sociol Rev. 2011 Apr;76(2):265-290
pubmed: 21580799
Demography. 2006 Feb;43(1):1-24
pubmed: 16579206