Engineering analysis of multienzyme cascade reactions for 3'-sialyllactose synthesis.
3ʹ-sialyllactose
CMP-N-acetyl-
d-neuraminic acid
N-acetyl-
d-mannosamine
N-acetyl-
d-neuraminic acid (Neu5Ac)
biocatalysis
lactose
lyase
multienzyme cascade reaction
sialo-oligosaccharides
synthase
α2,3-sialyltransferase
Journal
Biotechnology and bioengineering
ISSN: 1097-0290
Titre abrégé: Biotechnol Bioeng
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7502021
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2021
11 2021
Historique:
revised:
29
06
2021
received:
20
05
2021
accepted:
18
07
2021
pubmed:
22
7
2021
medline:
4
3
2022
entrez:
21
7
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Sialo-oligosaccharides are important products of emerging biotechnology for complex carbohydrates as nutritional ingredients. Cascade bio-catalysis is central to the development of sialo-oligosaccharide production systems, based on isolated enzymes or whole cells. Multienzyme transformations have been established for sialo-oligosaccharide synthesis from expedient substrates, but systematic engineering analysis for the optimization of such transformations is lacking. Here, we show a mathematical modeling-guided approach to 3'-sialyllactose (3SL) synthesis from N-acetyl- d-neuraminic acid (Neu5Ac) and lactose in the presence of cytidine 5'-triphosphate, via the reactions of cytidine 5'-monophosphate-Neu5Ac synthetase and α2,3-sialyltransferase. The Neu5Ac was synthesized in situ from N-acetyl- d-mannosamine using the reversible reaction with pyruvate by Neu5Ac lyase or the effectively irreversible reaction with phosphoenolpyruvate by Neu5Ac synthase. We show through comprehensive time-course study by experiment and modeling that, due to kinetic rather than thermodynamic advantages of the synthase reaction, the 3SL yield was increased (up to 75%; 10.4 g/L) and the initial productivity doubled (15 g/L/h), compared with synthesis based on the lyase reaction. We further show model-based optimization to minimize the total loading of protein (saving: up to 43%) while maintaining a suitable ratio of the individual enzyme activities to achieve 3SL target yield (61%-75%; 7-10 g/L) and overall productivity (3-5 g/L/h). Collectively, our results reveal the principal factors of enzyme cascade efficiency for 3SL synthesis and highlight the important role of engineering analysis to make multienzyme-catalyzed transformations fit for oligosaccharide production.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34289079
doi: 10.1002/bit.27898
pmc: PMC9290085
doi:
Substances chimiques
3'-sialyllactose
0
Oligosaccharides
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
4290-4304Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors. Biotechnology and Bioengineering Published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Références
Biotechnol Adv. 2008 Sep-Oct;26(5):436-56
pubmed: 18565714
Carbohydr Res. 2019 Jan 15;472:86-97
pubmed: 30529493
Glycobiology. 2013 Nov;23(11):1293-304
pubmed: 23969291
Org Lett. 2006 May 25;8(11):2393-6
pubmed: 16706534
Enzyme Microb Technol. 2016 Jun;87-88:70-8
pubmed: 27178797
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008 Oct;80(5):757-65
pubmed: 18716769
Chemistry. 2017 Oct 26;23(60):15143-15149
pubmed: 28833646
J Biol Chem. 2005 Feb 4;280(5):3555-63
pubmed: 15516336
J Biotechnol. 2008 Apr 30;134(3-4):261-5
pubmed: 18378033
Chem Commun (Camb). 2015 Feb 21;51(15):3083-6
pubmed: 25619424
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2021 Nov;118(11):4290-4304
pubmed: 34289079
Adv Carbohydr Chem Biochem. 2015;72:113-90
pubmed: 26613816
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2019 Sep;116(9):2146-2155
pubmed: 31062868
Org Biomol Chem. 2011 Apr 21;9(8):2784-9
pubmed: 21359399
Sci Rep. 2011;1:142
pubmed: 22355659
Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2021 Apr;61:81-95
pubmed: 33310623
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005 Dec 23;338(3):1507-14
pubmed: 16274664
Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2011 Sep 1;21(17):5037-40
pubmed: 21592790
Glycobiology. 2016 Apr;26(4):353-9
pubmed: 26582604
ACS Synth Biol. 2021 May 21;10(5):923-938
pubmed: 33909411
J Org Chem. 2016 Nov 18;81(22):10809-10824
pubmed: 27736072
Org Biomol Chem. 2016 Mar 14;14(10):2809-18
pubmed: 26881499
N Biotechnol. 2015 Dec 25;32(6):658-64
pubmed: 25534674
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013 Jun;97(11):4775-84
pubmed: 23420269
Carbohydr Res. 2017 Nov 8;451:51-58
pubmed: 28961426
Biotechnol Adv. 2019 Nov 15;37(7):107406
pubmed: 31200016
Chembiochem. 2017 Aug 4;18(15):1544-1550
pubmed: 28474804
Biotechnol Bioeng. 1999;66(2):131-6
pubmed: 10567071
Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2019 Apr;56:130-137
pubmed: 30502637
Biotechnol Adv. 2019 Sep - Oct;37(5):667-697
pubmed: 30935964
J Biotechnol. 2017 Sep 20;258:79-91
pubmed: 28764968
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Oct 23;20(21):
pubmed: 31652818
Carbohydr Res. 2019 Jan 15;472:115-121
pubmed: 30562693
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011 Apr;77(7):2471-8
pubmed: 21317263
Microb Biotechnol. 2016 Sep;9(5):601-9
pubmed: 27418373
Bioresour Technol. 2012 Jul;115:183-95
pubmed: 22531164
Bioorg Med Chem. 2013 Aug 15;21(16):4778-85
pubmed: 23535562
Nucleic Acids Res. 2012 Jan;40(Database issue):D770-5
pubmed: 22064852
Eur J Biochem. 1984 Apr 2;140(1):203-8
pubmed: 6705794
J Biotechnol. 2020 Oct 10;322:54-65
pubmed: 32653637
Nat Protoc. 2006;1(5):2485-92
pubmed: 17406495
J Biotechnol. 2018 Oct 10;283:120-129
pubmed: 30044949
Microb Cell Fact. 2015 Dec 09;14:197
pubmed: 26655367
Carbohydr Res. 1998 Feb;306(4):575-8
pubmed: 9679278
Biotechnol Adv. 2020 Nov 15;44:107613
pubmed: 32822768
FEBS Lett. 2014 Aug 25;588(17):2978-84
pubmed: 24945729
J Biosci Bioeng. 2021 Mar;131(3):271-276
pubmed: 33168471
Enzyme Microb Technol. 1997 Apr;20(5):393-400
pubmed: 9084208
J Am Chem Soc. 2009 Dec 30;131(51):18467-77
pubmed: 19947630
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2018 Jan;115(1):192-205
pubmed: 28922469
Carbohydr Res. 2010 Jul 2;345(10):1394-9
pubmed: 20231015
Nutr Rev. 2016 Oct;74(10):635-44
pubmed: 27634978
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007 Sep;76(3):597-605
pubmed: 17604986
FEBS J. 2009 Jan;276(2):410-24
pubmed: 19137631