Comparison of mass spectrometry data and bioinformatics predictions to assess the bona fide localization of proteins identified in cell wall proteomics studies.

Bioinformatics prediction Cell wall Confocal microscopy Mass spectrometry Proteome Sub-cellular localization TagRFP

Journal

Plant science : an international journal of experimental plant biology
ISSN: 1873-2259
Titre abrégé: Plant Sci
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 9882015

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2021
Historique:
received: 16 03 2021
revised: 18 05 2021
accepted: 14 06 2021
entrez: 28 7 2021
pubmed: 29 7 2021
medline: 6 8 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Plant cell walls have complex architectures made of polysaccharides among which cellulose, hemicelluloses, pectins and cell wall proteins (CWPs). Some CWPs are anchored in the plasma membrane through a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchor. The secretion pathway is the classical route to reach the extracellular space. Based on experimental data, a canonical signal peptide (SP) has been defined, and bioinformatics tools allowing the prediction of the sub-cellular localization of proteins have been designed. In the same way, the presence of GPI-anchor attachment sites can be predicted using bioinformatics programs. This article aims at comparing the bioinformatics predictions of the sub-cellular localization of proteins assumed to be CWPs to mass spectrometry (MS) data. The sub-cellular localization of a few CWPs exhibiting particular features has been checked by cell biology approaches. Although the prediction of SP length is confirmed in most cases, it is less conclusive for GPI-anchors. Three main observations were done: (i) the variability observed at the N-terminus of a few mature CWPs could play a role in the regulation of their biological activity; (ii) one protein was shown to have a double sub-cellular localization in the cell wall and the chloroplasts; and (iii) peptides were found to be located at the C-terminus of several CWPs previously identified in GPI-anchored proteomes, thus raising the issue of their actual anchoring to the plasma membrane.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34315595
pii: S0168-9452(21)00175-8
doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2021.110979
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Plant Proteins 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

110979

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Artur Pinski (A)

Laboratoire de Recherche en Sciences Végétales, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, Auzeville Tolosane, France; Institute of Biology, Biotechnology and Environmental Protection, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Silesia in Katowice, 40-032, Katowice, Poland.

David Roujol (D)

Laboratoire de Recherche en Sciences Végétales, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, Auzeville Tolosane, France.

Cécile Pouzet (C)

FR AIB-TRI Imaging Platform Facilities, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, Auzeville Tolosane, France.

Luc Bordes (L)

FR AIB-TRI Imaging Platform Facilities, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, Auzeville Tolosane, France.

Hélène San Clemente (H)

Laboratoire de Recherche en Sciences Végétales, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, Auzeville Tolosane, France.

Laurent Hoffmann (L)

Laboratoire de Recherche en Sciences Végétales, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, Auzeville Tolosane, France.

Elisabeth Jamet (E)

Laboratoire de Recherche en Sciences Végétales, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, Auzeville Tolosane, France. Electronic address: jamet@lrsv.ups-tlse.fr.

Articles similaires

Amaryllidaceae Alkaloids Lycoris NADPH-Ferrihemoprotein Reductase Gene Expression Regulation, Plant Plant Proteins
Drought Resistance Gene Expression Profiling Gene Expression Regulation, Plant Gossypium Multigene Family
Humans Colorectal Neoplasms Biomarkers, Tumor Prognosis Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic

Classifications MeSH