Structured Reporting of Computed Tomography Examinations in Post-Lung Transplantation Patients.
Journal
Journal of computer assisted tomography
ISSN: 1532-3145
Titre abrégé: J Comput Assist Tomogr
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7703942
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
pubmed:
5
8
2021
medline:
15
12
2021
entrez:
4
8
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of this study was to evaluate the benefits and potential of structured reports (SR) for chest computed tomography after lung transplantation. Free-text reports (FTR) and SR were generated for 49 computed tomography scans. Clinical routine reports were used as FTR. Two pulmonologists rated formal aspects, completeness, clinical utility, and overall quality. Wilcoxon and McNemar tests were used for statistical analysis. Structured reports received significantly higher ratings for all formals aspects (P < 0.001, respectively). Completeness was higher in SR with regard to evaluation of bronchiectases, bronchial anastomoses, bronchiolitic and fibrotic changes (P < 0.001, respectively), and air trapping (P = 0.012), but not signs of pneumonia (P = 0.5). Clinical utility and overall quality were rated significantly higher for SR than FTR (P < 0.001, respectively). However, report type did not influence initiation of further diagnostic or therapeutic measures (P = 0.307 and 1.0). Structured reports are superior to FTR with regard to formal aspects, completeness, clinical utility, and overall satisfaction of referring pulmonologists.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34347712
doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000001209
pii: 00004728-900000000-98898
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
959-963Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Wieland H. Sommer is a cofounder of the Smart Reporting GmbH, an online software company for structured reporting templates. Neither were the design, or implementation, or evaluation of our study influenced by Smart Reporting GmbH, nor did the company financially support the study. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest.
Références
Pinto dos Santos D, Hempel J-M, Mildenberger P, et al. Structured reporting in clinical routine. Fortschr Röntgenstr. 2019;191:33–39. doi:10.1055/a-0636-3851.
doi: 10.1055/a-0636-3851
Nobel JM, Kok EM, Robben SGF. Redefining the structure of structured reporting in radiology. Insights Imaging. 2020;11:10. doi:10.1186/s13244-019-0831-6.
doi: 10.1186/s13244-019-0831-6
Hickey P. Standardization of Roentgen-ray reports. Am J Roentgenol. 1922;9:442–445.
Dunnick NR, Langlotz CP. The radiology report of the future: a summary of the 2007 Intersociety Conference. J Am Coll Radiol. 2008;5:626–629. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2007.12.015.
doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2007.12.015
Morgan TA, Helibrun ME, Kahn CE Jr. Reporting initiative of the Radiological Society of North America: progress and new directions. Radiology. 2014;273:642–645. doi:10.1148/radiol.14141227.
doi: 10.1148/radiol.14141227
Ganeshan D, Duong PT, Probyn L, et al. Structured reporting in radiology. Acad Radiol. 2018;25:66–73. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2017.08.005.
doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2017.08.005
Verleden GM, Raghu G, Meyer KC, et al. A new classification system for chronic lung allograft dysfunction. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2014;33:127–133. doi:10.1016/j.healun.2013.10.022.
doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2013.10.022
Verleden SE, Vos R, Vanaudenaerde BM, et al. Chronic lung allograft dysfunction phenotypes and treatment. J Thorac Dis. 2017;9:2650–2659. doi:10.21037/jtd.2017.07.81.
doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.07.81
Verleden GM, Vos R, Vanaudenaerde B, et al. Current views on chronic rejection after lung transplantation. Transpl Int. 2015;28:1131–1139. doi:10.1111/tri.12579.
doi: 10.1111/tri.12579
Bin Saeedan M, Rizk A, Yadav R, et al. Imaging evaluation of airway complications after lung transplant. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2020;44:314–327. doi:10.1097/rct.0000000000000996.
doi: 10.1097/rct.0000000000000996
Schwartz LH, Panicek DM, Berk AR, et al. Improving communication of diagnostic radiology findings through structured reporting. Radiology. 2011;260:174–181. doi:10.1148/radiol.11101913/-/DC1.
doi: 10.1148/radiol.11101913/-/DC1
Sabel BO, Plum JL, Kneidinger N, et al. Structured reporting of CT examinations in acute pulmonary embolism. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017;11:188–195. doi:org/10.1016/j.jcct.2017.02.008.
doi: org/10.1016/j.jcct.2017.02.008
Sabel BO, Plum JL, Czihal M, et al. Structured reporting of CT angiography runoff examinations of the lower extremities. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018;55:679–687. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.01.026.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.01.026
Kim SH, Sobez LM, Spiro JE, et al. Structured reporting has the potential to reduce reporting times of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry exams. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020;21:248. doi:10.1186/s12891-020-03200-w.
doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03200-w
Schoeppe F, Sommer WH, Nörenberg D, et al. Structured reporting adds clinical value in primary CT staging of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Eur Radiol. 2018;28:3702–3709. doi:10.1007/s00330-018-5340-3.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5340-3
Chundru K, Roudenko A, Pham H, et al. Analysis of different levels of structured reporting in knee magnetic resonance imaging. Acad Radiol. 2020;27:1440–1446; S1076–6332(20)30163-X. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2019.12.019.
doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2019.12.019
Gassenmaier S, Armbruster M, Haasters F, et al. Structured reporting of MRI of the shoulder—improvement of report quality? Eur Radiol. 2017;27:4110–4119. doi:10.1007/s00330-017-4778-z.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-4778-z
Ernst BP, Hodeib M, Strieth S, et al. Structured reporting of head and neck ultrasound examinations. BMC Med Imaging. 2019;19:25. doi:10.1186/s12880-019-0325-5.
doi: 10.1186/s12880-019-0325-5
Armbruster M, Gassenmaier S, Haack M, et al. Structured reporting in petrous bone MRI examinations: impact on report completeness and quality. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2018;13:1971–1980. doi:10.1007/s11548-018-1828-1.
doi: 10.1007/s11548-018-1828-1
Wildman-Tobriner B, Allen BC, Bashir MR, et al. Structured reporting of CT enterography for inflammatory bowel disease: effect on key feature reporting, accuracy across training levels, and subjective assessment of disease by referring physicians. Abdom Radiol. 2017;42:2243–2250. doi:10.1007/s00261-017-1136-1.
doi: 10.1007/s00261-017-1136-1
Brook OR, Brook A, Vollmer CM, et al. Structured reporting of multiphasic CT for pancreatic cancer: potential effect on staging and surgical planning. Radiology. 2015;274:464–472. doi:10.1148/radiol.14140206.
doi: 10.1148/radiol.14140206
Sahni VA, Silveira PC, Sainani NI, et al. Impact of a structured report template on the quality of MRI reports for rectal cancer staging. Am J Roentgenol. 2015;205:584–588. doi:10.2214/AJR.14.14053.
doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.14053
Ernst BP, Katzer F, Künzel J, et al. Impact of structured reporting on developing head and neck ultrasound skills. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19:102. doi:10.1186/s12909-019-1538-6.
doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1538-6
Alessandrino F, Cristiano L, Cinnante CM, et al. Value of structured reporting in neuromuscular disorders. Radiol Med. 2019;124:628–635. doi:10.1007/s11547-019-01012-0.
doi: 10.1007/s11547-019-01012-0
Tuncyurek O, Garces-Descovich A, Jaramillo-Cardoso A, et al. Structured versus narrative reporting of pelvic MRI in perianal fistulizing disease: impact on clarity, completeness, and surgical planning. Abdom Radiol. 2019;44:811–820. doi:10.1007/s00261-018-1858-8.
doi: 10.1007/s00261-018-1858-8
Flusberg M, Ganeles J, Ekinci T, et al. Impact of a structured report template on the quality of CT and MRI reports for hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017;14:1206–1211. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2017.02.050.
doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.02.050
Dickerson E, Davenport MS, Syed F, et al. Effect of template reporting of brain MRIs for multiple sclerosis on report thoroughness and neurologist-rated quality: results of a prospective quality improvement project. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017;14:371–379.e1. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2016.09.037.
doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.09.037
Ghoshhajra BB, Lee AM, Ferencik M, et al. Interpreting the interpretations: the use of structured reporting improves referring clinicians' comprehension of coronary CT angiography reports. J Am Coll Radiol. 2013;10:432–438. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2012.11.012.
doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2012.11.012
Verleden GM, Glanville AR, Lease ED, et al. Chronic lung allograft dysfunction: definition, diagnostic criteria, and approaches to treatment—a consensus report from the Pulmonary Council of the ISHLT. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2019;38:493–503. doi:10.1016/j.healun.2019.03.009.
doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2019.03.009