Neurofilament light chain and glial fibrillary acidic protein levels in metachromatic leukodystrophy.
arylsulfatase A
biomarker
glial fibrillary acidic protein
metachromatic leukodystrophy
neurofilament light
Journal
Brain : a journal of neurology
ISSN: 1460-2156
Titre abrégé: Brain
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0372537
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 03 2022
29 03 2022
Historique:
received:
11
05
2021
revised:
22
06
2021
accepted:
14
07
2021
pubmed:
17
8
2021
medline:
2
4
2022
entrez:
16
8
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Metachromatic leukodystrophy is a lethal metabolic leukodystrophy, with emerging treatments for early disease stages. Biomarkers to measure disease activity are required for clinical assessment and treatment follow-up. This retrospective study compared neurofilament light chain and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) levels in CSF (n = 11) and blood (n = 92) samples of 40 patients with metachromatic leukodystrophy (aged 0-42 years) with 38 neurologically healthy children (aged 0-17 years) and 38 healthy adults (aged 18-45 years), and analysed the associations between these levels with clinical phenotype and disease evolution in untreated and transplanted patients. Metachromatic leukodystrophy subtype was determined based on the (expected) age of symptom onset. Disease activity was assessed by measuring gross motor function deterioration and brain MRI. Longitudinal analyses with measurements up to 23 years after diagnosis were performed using linear mixed models. CSF and blood neurofilament light chain and GFAP levels in paediatric controls were negatively associated with age (all P < 0.001). Blood neurofilament light chain level at diagnosis (median, interquartile range; picograms per millilitre) was significantly increased in both presymptomatic (14.7, 10.6-56.7) and symptomatic patients (136, 40.8-445) compared to controls (5.6, 4.5-7.1), and highest among patients with late-infantile (456, 201-854) or early-juvenile metachromatic leukodystrophy (291.0, 104-445) and those ineligible for treatment based on best practice (291, 57.4-472). GFAP level (median, interquartile range; picogram per millilitre) was only increased in symptomatic patients (591, 224-1150) compared to controls (119, 78.2-338) and not significantly associated with treatment eligibility (P = 0.093). Higher blood neurofilament light chain and GFAP levels at diagnosis were associated with rapid disease progression in late-infantile (P = 0.006 and P = 0.051, respectively) and early-juvenile patients (P = 0.048 and P = 0.039, respectively). Finally, blood neurofilament light chain and GFAP levels decreased during follow-up in untreated and transplanted patients but remained elevated compared with controls. Only neurofilament light chain levels were associated with MRI deterioration (P < 0.001). This study indicates that both proteins may be considered as non-invasive biomarkers for clinical phenotype and disease stage at clinical assessment, and that neurofilament light chain might enable neurologists to make better informed treatment decisions. In addition, neurofilament light chain holds promise assessing treatment response. Importantly, both biomarkers require paediatric reference values, given that their levels first decrease before increasing with advancing age.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34398223
pii: 6353022
doi: 10.1093/brain/awab304
pmc: PMC8967093
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers
0
GFAP protein, human
0
Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein
0
Neurofilament Proteins
0
neurofilament protein L
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
105-118Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA008748
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) (2021). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain.
Références
Nat Med. 2019 Feb;25(2):277-283
pubmed: 30664784
Neuron. 2004 Nov 18;44(4):651-61
pubmed: 15541313
Neurogenetics. 2020 Oct;21(4):289-299
pubmed: 32632536
J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2019 Jun;24(2):187-194
pubmed: 30973667
Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2021 May;32:93-97
pubmed: 33878608
Neurology. 2021 Jan 12;96(2):e255-e266
pubmed: 33046606
J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2018 Sep;23(3):174-177
pubmed: 29974556
JAMA Neurol. 2016 Sep 1;73(9):1133-40
pubmed: 27400410
J Neuroimmunol. 2014 Jan 15;266(1-2):75-81
pubmed: 24342231
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011 Sep;53(9):850-855
pubmed: 21707604
Clin Biochem. 2014 Mar;47(4-5):288-92
pubmed: 24389077
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2019 Nov 4;14(1):240
pubmed: 31684987
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011 Feb;53(2):156-60
pubmed: 21087233
Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2020 Feb;7(2):169-180
pubmed: 31967741
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009 Nov;30(10):1893-7
pubmed: 19797797
Neurology. 2019 Sep 3;93(10):e968-e974
pubmed: 31383792
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2013 Apr;19(4):616-24
pubmed: 23348427
Ann Neurol. 2016 Jan;79(1):152-8
pubmed: 26528863
Histochem Cell Biol. 2013 Jul;140(1):13-22
pubmed: 23749407
Arch Toxicol. 2020 Jul;94(7):2517-2522
pubmed: 32333051
Neurology. 2018 Oct 16;91(16):755-757
pubmed: 30217938
J Neurol. 2019 Sep;266(9):2129-2136
pubmed: 31123861
Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2015 May;2(5):518-33
pubmed: 26000324
Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2020 May;7(5):767-775
pubmed: 32304358
Mult Scler. 2019 Jun;25(7):958-967
pubmed: 29774770
JAMA Neurol. 2019 Sep 1;76(9):1035-1048
pubmed: 31206160
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2015 Aug 07;10:94
pubmed: 26245762
J Inherit Metab Dis. 2011 Oct;34(5):1095-102
pubmed: 21698385
Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2020 Nov;7(11):2127-2136
pubmed: 33047897
Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015 Mar;29(2):261-73
pubmed: 25987178
Mol Cell Pediatr. 2020 Sep 3;7(1):12
pubmed: 32910272
Genet Med. 2021 Apr;23(4):751-757
pubmed: 33239751
Neurology. 2018 Feb 6;90(6):e518-e524
pubmed: 29321234
Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2019 Aug 08;6(5):e598
pubmed: 31516913
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2019 Jun 11;14(1):136
pubmed: 31186049
Pediatr Neurol. 2013 Jul;49(1):31-39.e2
pubmed: 23827424
Nat Rev Neurol. 2018 Oct;14(10):577-589
pubmed: 30171200
Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2017 May 16;4(6):403-410
pubmed: 28589167
Alzheimers Dement. 2021 Nov 29;:
pubmed: 34845818
Sci Rep. 2018 Oct 4;8(1):14798
pubmed: 30287870
Lancet Neurol. 2019 Dec;18(12):1103-1111
pubmed: 31701893
J Immunol Methods. 2014 Jan 15;402(1-2):43-9
pubmed: 24275679
Nat Rev Neurol. 2021 Feb;17(2):88-103
pubmed: 33324001
Neuron. 2020 Jul 8;107(1):65-81.e9
pubmed: 32375064
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 02;10(7):e0132177
pubmed: 26136237
Ann Neurol. 2017 Jun;81(6):857-870
pubmed: 28512753
Blood. 2016 Jun 16;127(24):3098-101
pubmed: 27118454
Neurology. 2006 Sep 26;67(6):1071-3
pubmed: 17000982
Hum Mol Genet. 2021 Feb 4;29(23):3807-3817
pubmed: 33367737
Lancet. 2016 Jul 30;388(10043):476-87
pubmed: 27289174