Mastication of crisp bread: Role of bread texture and structure on texture perception.

Bolus properties Bread FOP Mastication Sensory perception Texture

Journal

Food research international (Ottawa, Ont.)
ISSN: 1873-7145
Titre abrégé: Food Res Int
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 9210143

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 2021
Historique:
received: 01 03 2021
revised: 07 05 2021
accepted: 23 05 2021
entrez: 17 8 2021
pubmed: 18 8 2021
medline: 7 9 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Texture and structure of breads have been related to oral processing (FOP) performance and sensory perceptions, but moisture content might play a significant role. To evaluate the real impact of breads texture and structure, eliminating the possible role of moisture content, different toasted breads were investigated. Four commercial toasted sliced breads (white bread -WHB-, whole wheat bread -WWB-, non-added sugar bread -NSU-, non-added salt bread -NSA-) with similar ingredients but different texture and structure were selected. Texture and structure were instrumentally and sensory evaluated, besides FOP (total chewing time, number of chews until swallowing, chewing frequency, and mouthful) and bolus properties (moisture, saliva to bread ratio, hardness, adhesiveness, and cohesiveness). Toasted breads showed significant differences in hardness, cutting strength, and porosity, but panelists did not discriminate among them. FOP results indicated that harder samples (NSU) required longer mastication and a number of chews, and open crumb structures (WWB, WHB) with higher cell areas required less mastication. Also, bolus characteristics were affected by bread types, and bread with lower crumb hardness (WHB) produced more cohesive bolus. Having toasted breads allowed to eliminate possible influence of moisture content differences on sensory perception, mouthful and bolus water incorporation during mastication.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34399473
pii: S0963-9969(21)00376-8
doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110477
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

110477

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Andrea Aleixandre (A)

Institute of Agrochemistry and Food Technology (IATA-CSIC), C/Agustin Escardino, 7, 46980 Paterna, Spain; University Ss. Cyril and Methodius, Faculty of Technology and Metallurgy, Rudjer Boskovic 16, 1000-Skopje, North Macedonia. Electronic address: andrea.aleixandre@csic.es.

Yaiza Benavent-Gil (Y)

Institute of Agrochemistry and Food Technology (IATA-CSIC), C/Agustin Escardino, 7, 46980 Paterna, Spain.

Elena Velickova (E)

University Ss. Cyril and Methodius, Faculty of Technology and Metallurgy, Rudjer Boskovic 16, 1000-Skopje, North Macedonia. Electronic address: velickova@tmf.ukim.edu.mk.

Cristina M Rosell (CM)

Institute of Agrochemistry and Food Technology (IATA-CSIC), C/Agustin Escardino, 7, 46980 Paterna, Spain. Electronic address: crosell@iata.csic.es.

Articles similaires

Artificial Intelligence Humans Touch Laser Therapy

Can Different Impression Techniques Affect the Chewing Efficiency of Mandibular Implant-Retained Overdentures?

Esmail Ahmed Abdel-Gawwad, Mostafa I Fayad, Mohamed Abdullah Quassem et al.
1.00
Humans Denture, Overlay Dental Impression Technique Mastication Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported
Humans Motion Perception Male Female Adult
1.00
Humans Mastication Visual Cortex Male Female

Classifications MeSH