Soil enzyme responses to land use change in the tropical rainforest of the Colombian Amazon region.
Acetylglucosaminidase
/ analysis
Acid Phosphatase
/ analysis
Agriculture
/ methods
Carbon
/ analysis
Cellulose 1,4-beta-Cellobiosidase
/ analysis
Colombia
Conservation of Natural Resources
Glucosidases
/ analysis
Microbiota
Nitrogen
/ analysis
Phosphorus
/ analysis
Rainforest
Soil
/ chemistry
Soil Microbiology
Tropical Climate
Xylosidases
/ analysis
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
05
04
2021
accepted:
21
07
2021
entrez:
18
8
2021
pubmed:
19
8
2021
medline:
15
12
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Soil enzymes mediate key processes and functions of the soils, such as organic matter decomposition and nutrient cycling in both natural and agricultural ecosystems. Here, we studied the activity of five extracellular soil enzymes involved in the C, N, and P-mineralizing process in both litter and surface soil layer of rainforest in the northwest region of the Colombian Amazon and the response of those soil enzymes to land use change. The experimental study design included six study sites for comparing long-term pasture systems to native forest and regeneration practices after pasture, within the main landscapes of the region, mountain and hill landscapes separately. Results showed considerable enzymatic activity in the litter layer of the forest, highlighting the vital role of this compartment in the nutrient cycling of low fertility soils from tropical regions. With the land use transition to pastures, changes in soil enzymatic activities were driven by the management of pastures, with SOC and N losses and reduced absolute activity of soil enzymes in long-term pastures under continuous grazing (25 years). However, the enzyme activities expressed per unit of SOC did not show changes in C and N-acquiring enzymes, suggesting a higher mineralization potential in pastures. Enzymatic stoichiometry analysis indicated a microbial P limitation that could lead to a high catabolic activity with a potential increase in the use of SOC by microbial communities in the search for P, thus affecting soil C sequestration, soil quality and the provision of soil-related ecosystem services.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34407107
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255669
pii: PONE-D-21-11172
pmc: PMC8372923
doi:
Substances chimiques
Soil
0
Phosphorus
27YLU75U4W
Carbon
7440-44-0
Acid Phosphatase
EC 3.1.3.2
Glucosidases
EC 3.2.1.-
Xylosidases
EC 3.2.1.-
exo-1,4-beta-D-xylosidase
EC 3.2.1.37
Acetylglucosaminidase
EC 3.2.1.52
Cellulose 1,4-beta-Cellobiosidase
EC 3.2.1.91
Nitrogen
N762921K75
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0255669Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Glob Chang Biol. 2016 Oct;22(10):3503-17
pubmed: 26929394
Nature. 2000 Jan 20;403(6767):301-4
pubmed: 10659847
Microb Ecol. 2009 Aug;58(2):414-24
pubmed: 19330551
Glob Chang Biol. 2015 Sep;21(9):3532-47
pubmed: 25873563
Ecology. 2007 Aug;88(8):2105-13
pubmed: 17824441
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e59943
pubmed: 23536898
Ecol Lett. 2008 Nov;11(11):1252-1264
pubmed: 18823393
Conserv Biol. 2019 Jun;33(3):590-600
pubmed: 30306643
Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 10;10(1):2302
pubmed: 32041976
Arch Microbiol. 2020 Dec;202(10):2809-2824
pubmed: 32747999
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2020 Sep 1;96(9):
pubmed: 32710756
Glob Change Biol Bioenergy. 2019 Dec;11(12):1444-1455
pubmed: 31894185
Nature. 2009 Dec 10;462(7274):795-8
pubmed: 20010687
Glob Chang Biol. 2013 May;19(5):1347-57
pubmed: 23504715
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2019 Mar 1;95(3):
pubmed: 30544159
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Jun;25(17):16979-16990
pubmed: 29627959
Glob Chang Biol. 2015 Jul;21(7):2773-2786
pubmed: 25726833
Sci Rep. 2017 May 2;7(1):1337
pubmed: 28465504
Oecologia. 2014 May;175(1):375-93
pubmed: 24532178
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010 Oct;76(19):6485-93
pubmed: 20709838
J Vis Exp. 2013 Nov 15;(81):e50961
pubmed: 24299913
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 13;12(6):e0179414
pubmed: 28609462