A real-world demonstration of machine learning generalizability in the detection of intracranial hemorrhage on head computerized tomography.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 08 2021
23 08 2021
Historique:
received:
17
11
2020
accepted:
22
07
2021
entrez:
24
8
2021
pubmed:
25
8
2021
medline:
3
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Machine learning (ML) holds great promise in transforming healthcare. While published studies have shown the utility of ML models in interpreting medical imaging examinations, these are often evaluated under laboratory settings. The importance of real world evaluation is best illustrated by case studies that have documented successes and failures in the translation of these models into clinical environments. A key prerequisite for the clinical adoption of these technologies is demonstrating generalizable ML model performance under real world circumstances. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate that ML model generalizability is achievable in medical imaging with the detection of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) on non-contrast computed tomography (CT) scans serving as the use case. An ML model was trained using 21,784 scans from the RSNA Intracranial Hemorrhage CT dataset while generalizability was evaluated using an external validation dataset obtained from our busy trauma and neurosurgical center. This real world external validation dataset consisted of every unenhanced head CT scan (n = 5965) performed in our emergency department in 2019 without exclusion. The model demonstrated an AUC of 98.4%, sensitivity of 98.8%, and specificity of 98.0%, on the test dataset. On external validation, the model demonstrated an AUC of 95.4%, sensitivity of 91.3%, and specificity of 94.1%. Evaluating the ML model using a real world external validation dataset that is temporally and geographically distinct from the training dataset indicates that ML generalizability is achievable in medical imaging applications.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34426587
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-95533-2
pii: 10.1038/s41598-021-95533-2
pmc: PMC8382750
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
17051Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012 Jan;33(1):37-42
pubmed: 22033725
BMJ Open. 2013 Dec 17;3(12):e003684
pubmed: 24345898
Acad Radiol. 2021 Jan;28(1):85-93
pubmed: 32102747
Lancet. 2018 Dec 1;392(10162):2388-2396
pubmed: 30318264
Acad Radiol. 2020 Jan;27(1):153-155
pubmed: 31740288
Stroke. 2010 Sep;41(9):2108-29
pubmed: 20651276
Radiology. 2017 Dec;285(3):923-931
pubmed: 28678669
Lancet. 2018 Oct 6;392(10154):1257-1268
pubmed: 30319113
Stroke. 2012 Aug;43(8):2126-9
pubmed: 22700527
Stroke. 2009 Feb;40(2):394-9
pubmed: 19038914
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2019 May;38(5):1197-1206
pubmed: 30442603
Lancet Neurol. 2010 Feb;9(2):167-76
pubmed: 20056489
Neuroradiology. 2020 Mar;62(3):335-340
pubmed: 31828361
Korean J Radiol. 2019 Mar;20(3):405-410
pubmed: 30799571
J Neurosurg. 2015 Nov;123(5):1176-83
pubmed: 25955872
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Nov 5;116(45):22737-22745
pubmed: 31636195
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005 Nov;76(11):1534-8
pubmed: 16227546
J Am Coll Radiol. 2017 Nov;14(11):1498-1503
pubmed: 28916177
NPJ Digit Med. 2018 Apr 4;1:9
pubmed: 31304294
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2001;11(3):183-9
pubmed: 11306765
Radiol Artif Intell. 2020 Apr 29;2(3):e190211
pubmed: 33937827
Radiology. 2014 Mar;270(3):717-35
pubmed: 24475832