Assessment of genetic diversity and variety identification based on developed retrotransposon-based insertion polymorphism (RBIP) markers in sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.).
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 08 2021
24 08 2021
Historique:
received:
12
04
2021
accepted:
28
07
2021
entrez:
25
8
2021
pubmed:
26
8
2021
medline:
3
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Sweet potato, a dicotyledonous and perennial plant, is the third tuber/root crop species behind potato and cassava in terms of production. Long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons are highly abundant in sweet potato, contributing to genetic diversity. Retrotransposon-based insertion polymorphism (RBIP) is a high-throughput marker system to study the genetic diversity of plant species. To date, there have been no transposon marker-based genetic diversity analyses of sweet potato. Here, we reported a structure-based analysis of the sweet potato genome, a total of 21555 LTR retrotransposons, which belonged to the main LTR-retrotransposon subfamilies Ty3-gypsy and Ty1-copia were identified. After searching and selecting using Hidden Markov Models (HMMs), 1616 LTR retrotransposon sequences containing at least two models were screened. A total of 48 RBIP primers were synthesized based on the high copy numbers of conserved LTR sequences. Fifty-six amplicons with an average polymorphism of 91.07% were generated in 105 sweet potato germplasm resources based on RBIP markers. A Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmatic Mean (UPGMA) dendrogram, a model-based genetic structure and principal component analysis divided the sweet potato germplasms into 3 groups containing 8, 53, and 44 germplasms. All the three analyses produced significant groupwise consensus. However, almost all the germplasms contained only one primary locus. The analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) among the groups indicated higher intergroup genetic variation (53%) than intrapopulation genetic variation. In addition, long-term self-retention may cause some germplasm resources to exhibit variable segregation. These results suggest that these sweet potato germplasms are not well evolutionarily diversified, although geographic speciation could have occurred at a limited level. This study highlights the utility of RBIP markers for determining the intraspecies variability of sweet potato and have the potential to be used as core primer pairs for variety identification, genetic diversity assessment and linkage map construction. The results could provide a good theoretical reference and guidance for germplasm research and breeding.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34429441
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-95876-w
pii: 10.1038/s41598-021-95876-w
pmc: PMC8385064
doi:
Substances chimiques
Genetic Markers
0
Retroelements
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
17116Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Mol Biol Evol. 2018 Jun 1;35(6):1547-1549
pubmed: 29722887
Am J Hum Genet. 1980 May;32(3):314-31
pubmed: 6247908
Mol Biol Res Commun. 2020 Sep;9(3):93-103
pubmed: 33313328
Genetics. 1997 Jul;146(3):769-79
pubmed: 9215886
Heredity (Edinb). 2011 Apr;106(4):520-30
pubmed: 20683483
Mol Ecol Resour. 2010 May;10(3):564-7
pubmed: 21565059
Mutat Res. 2002 Feb 20;499(2):213-25
pubmed: 11827714
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 10;12(2):e0172066
pubmed: 28187178
Genome Biol. 2004;5(6):225
pubmed: 15186483
Gene. 2017 Aug 30;626:14-25
pubmed: 28476688
Genome Res. 2002 May;12(5):795-807
pubmed: 11997346
Mol Ecol Notes. 2007 Jul 1;7(4):574-578
pubmed: 18784791
Mol Genet Genomics. 2015 Feb;290(1):225-37
pubmed: 25216935
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Oct;76(10):5269-73
pubmed: 291943
BMC Genomics. 2016 Nov 21;17(1):945
pubmed: 27871234
Theor Appl Genet. 2010 Feb;120(3):491-508
pubmed: 19826774
Mol Biol Rep. 2020 Mar;47(3):1589-1603
pubmed: 31919750
Brief Bioinform. 2007 Nov;8(6):382-92
pubmed: 17932080
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Dec;81(24):8014-8
pubmed: 6096873
Mol Ecol. 2005 Jul;14(8):2611-20
pubmed: 15969739
Science. 2009 Nov 20;326(5956):1112-5
pubmed: 19965430
Genetics. 2000 Jun;155(2):945-59
pubmed: 10835412
Genome Res. 2013 Feb;23(2):396-408
pubmed: 23149293
Evolution. 1984 Nov;38(6):1358-1370
pubmed: 28563791
Breed Sci. 2015 Mar;65(2):145-53
pubmed: 26069444
BMC Plant Biol. 2011 Oct 20;11:139
pubmed: 22011271