Comparison of Midterm Outcomes Associated With Aspirin and Ticagrelor vs Aspirin Monotherapy After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Acute Coronary Syndrome.
Acute Coronary Syndrome
/ surgery
Aged
Aspirin
/ therapeutic use
Cohort Studies
Coronary Artery Bypass
/ adverse effects
Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy
/ methods
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Postoperative Hemorrhage
/ drug therapy
Propensity Score
Prospective Studies
Sweden
Ticagrelor
/ therapeutic use
Journal
JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 08 2021
02 08 2021
Historique:
entrez:
26
8
2021
pubmed:
27
8
2021
medline:
11
1
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Guidelines recommend dual antiplatelet therapy after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, the evidence for these recommendations is weak. To compare midterm outcomes after CABG in patients with ACS treated postoperatively with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and ticagrelor or with ASA monotherapy. This cohort study used merged data from several national registries of Swedish patients who were diagnosed with ACS and subsequently underwent CABG. All included patients underwent isolated CABG in Sweden between 2012 and 2017 with an ACS diagnosis less than 6 weeks before the procedure, survived 14 days after discharge from hospital, and were treated postoperatively with ASA plus ticagrelor or ASA monotherapy. A multivariable Cox regression model was used for the main analysis, and propensity score-matched models were performed as sensitivity analysis. Data were analyzed between May and September 2020. Postoperative antiplatelet treatment, defined as filled prescriptions, with either ASA and ticagrelor or ASA only. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke, and major bleeding, at 12 months and at the end of follow-up. A total of 6558 patients (5281 [80.5%] men; mean [SD] age at surgery, 67.6 [9.3] years) were included; 1813 (27.6%) were treated with ASA plus ticagrelor and 4745 (72.4%) were treated with ASA monotherapy. Crude MACE rate was 3.0 per 100 person years (95% CI, 2.5-3.6 per 100 person years) in the ASA plus ticagrelor group and 3.8 per 100 person years (95% CI, 3.5-4.1 per 100 person years) in the ASA group. After adjustment, there was no significant difference in MACE risk between ASA plus ticagrelor vs ASA only, neither during the first 12 months (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.84; 95% CI, 0.58-1.21; P = .34) or during total follow-up (aHR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.71-1.11; P = .29). The use of ASA plus ticagrelor was associated with a significantly increased risk for major bleeding during the first 12 months (aHR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.16-3.13; P = .011). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the results. In patients with ACS who survived 2 weeks after CABG, no significant difference in the risk of death or ischemic events could be demonstrated between ASA plus ticagrelor and patients treated with ASA only, while the risk for major bleeding was higher in patients treated with ASA plus ticagrelor. Sufficiently powered prospective randomized trials comparing different antiplatelet therapy strategies after CABG are warranted.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34436610
pii: 2783510
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.22597
pmc: PMC8391102
doi:
Substances chimiques
Ticagrelor
GLH0314RVC
Aspirin
R16CO5Y76E
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e2122597Références
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2018 Jul 1;27(1):67-74
pubmed: 29452368
Eur Heart J. 2009 Jun;30(12):1457-66
pubmed: 19351691
BMC Surg. 2015 Oct 14;15:112
pubmed: 26467661
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Mar 5;73(8):964-976
pubmed: 30819365
Circulation. 2004 Sep 7;110(10):1202-8
pubmed: 15313956
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Sep 6;68(10):1082-115
pubmed: 27036918
Circulation. 2006 Aug 22;114(8):774-82
pubmed: 16908769
Eur Heart J. 2018 Jan 14;39(3):213-260
pubmed: 28886622
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Sep 1;52(3):456-461
pubmed: 28387790
JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4
pubmed: 24141714
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2020 Jun;21(6):792-796
pubmed: 31672535
J Card Surg. 2013 Mar;28(2):109-16
pubmed: 23488578
Ann Intern Med. 2009 May 5;150(9):604-12
pubmed: 19414839
Clin Res Cardiol. 2019 Jun;108(6):643-650
pubmed: 30607496
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Mar 8;57(10):1202-9
pubmed: 21371637
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Apr 14;65(14):1411-20
pubmed: 25857906
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Feb 8;57(6):672-84
pubmed: 21194870
BMC Public Health. 2011 Jun 09;11:450
pubmed: 21658213
JAMA. 2018 Apr 24;319(16):1677-1686
pubmed: 29710164
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Dec;150(6):1548-54.e3
pubmed: 26395051
Heart. 2010 Oct;96(20):1617-21
pubmed: 20801780
Eur Heart J. 2020 May 1;41(17):1653-1661
pubmed: 31638654
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Aug 1;240:30-36
pubmed: 28476519
Am J Cardiol. 2005 Nov 1;96(9):1200-6
pubmed: 16253582
Eur Heart J. 2019 Aug 1;40(29):2432-2440
pubmed: 31145798