A Survey of Academic Neonatologists on Neonatal Electrical Cardioversion and Defibrillation.
Journal
American journal of perinatology
ISSN: 1098-8785
Titre abrégé: Am J Perinatol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8405212
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2023
10 2023
Historique:
medline:
20
9
2023
pubmed:
28
8
2021
entrez:
27
8
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This study aimed to assess neonatologists' experience and comfort with neonatal electrical cardioversion or defibrillation (EC-D). Electronic surveys were distributed to academic neonatologists affiliated with 12 Midwest academic hospitals. Neonatologists were asked about their residency training; years since completing residency; current certification/competency training in the Basic Life Support (BLS), Pediatric Advanced Life Support (PALS), Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support (ACLS), and Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP); experiences with EC-D; availability of a pediatric cardiologist; and their comfort levels with such procedures. Standard statistical tests evaluated comfort with EC-D. Seventy-two out of 180 neonatologists responded to the survey (response rate = 40%). Of them, 98.6% (71), 54.2% (39), and 37.5% (27) maintained current NRP, BLS, and PALS trainings, respectively. Also, 73.6% ( Of neonatologists who performed EC-D, half of them reported being uncomfortable. BLS certification and experience are positively associated with comfort in performing EC-D. Simulations to increase training in EC-D should be offered regularly to academic neonatologists. · Most neonatologists have performed EC-D, but many feel uncomfortable with performing EC-D.. · Many do not maintain current certification in BLS, PALS, or ACLS.. · Simulation training in EC-D will increase comfort with EC-D..
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1425-1430Informations de copyright
Thieme. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
None declared.