Context dependent differences in working memory related brain activity in heavy cannabis users.


Journal

Psychopharmacology
ISSN: 1432-2072
Titre abrégé: Psychopharmacology (Berl)
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 7608025

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
May 2022
Historique:
received: 23 03 2021
accepted: 03 08 2021
pubmed: 28 8 2021
medline: 19 5 2022
entrez: 27 8 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Compromised cognitive control in cannabis use-tempting situations is thought to play a key role in the development of cannabis use disorders. However, little is known about how exposure to cannabis cues and contexts may influence cognitive control and the underlying neural mechanisms in cannabis users. Working memory (WM) is an attention reliant executive function central to cognitive control. In this study, we investigated how distracting cannabis words affected WM load-dependent performance and related brain activity in near-daily cannabis users (N = 36) relative to controls (N = 33). Brain activity was recorded during a novel N-back flanker WM task with neutral and cannabis flankers added as task-irrelevant distractors. On a behavioural level, WM performance did not differ between groups, and the presence of cannabis flankers did not affect performance. However, in cannabis users compared to controls, the presence of cannabis flankers reduced WM load-related activity in multiple regions, including the insula, thalamus, superior parietal lobe and supramarginal gyrus. The group specificity of these effects suggest that cannabis users might differ from controls in the way they process cannabis-related cues and that cannabis cue exposure could interfere with other cognitive processes under cognitively demanding circumstances. Future studies should focus on the role of context in cognitive control-related processes like WM and attention to further elucidate potential cognitive impairments in heavy cannabis users and how these relate to loss of control over drug seeking itself.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34448889
doi: 10.1007/s00213-021-05956-y
pii: 10.1007/s00213-021-05956-y
pmc: PMC9110519
doi:

Substances chimiques

Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1373-1385

Subventions

Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : R01 DA042490
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

© 2021. The Author(s).

Références

Adamson SJ, Kay-Lambkin FJ, Baker AL et al (2010) An improved brief measure of cannabis misuse: the Cannabis Use Disorders Identification Test-Revised (CUDIT-R). Drug Alcohol Depend 110:137–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.02.017
doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.02.017 pubmed: 20347232
Ataya AF, Adams S, Mullings E et al (2012) Internal reliability of measures of substance-related cognitive bias. Drug Alcohol Depend 121:148–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.08.023
doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.08.023 pubmed: 21955365
Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M et al (1961) An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 4:561–571. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004
doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004 pubmed: 13688369
Becker B, Wagner D, Gouzoulis-Mayfrank E et al (2010) The impact of early-onset cannabis use on functional brain correlates of working memory. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacology Biol Psychiatry 34:837–845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2010.03.032
doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2010.03.032
Bossong M, Jager G, Bhattacharyya S, Allen P (2014) Acute and non-acute effects of cannabis on human memory function: a critical review of neuroimaging studies. Curr Pharm Des 20:2114–2125. https://doi.org/10.2174/13816128113199990436
doi: 10.2174/13816128113199990436 pubmed: 23829369
Charles-Walsh K, Upton DJ, Hester R (2016) Examining the interaction between cognitive control and reward sensitivity in substance use dependence. Drug Alcohol Depend 166:235–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.07.020
doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.07.020 pubmed: 27491815
Cousijn J, Goudriaan AE, Ridderinkhof KR et al (2013a) Neural responses associated with cue-reactivity in frequent cannabis users. Addict Biol 18:570–580. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-1600.2011.00417.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1369-1600.2011.00417.x pubmed: 22264344
Cousijn J, Vingerhoets WAM, Koenders L et al (2014a) Relationship between working-memory network function and substance use: a 3-year longitudinal fMRI study in heavy cannabis users and controls. Addict Biol 19:282–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/adb.12111
doi: 10.1111/adb.12111 pubmed: 24589297
Cousijn J, Watson P, Koenders L et al (2013b) Cannabis dependence, cognitive control and attentional bias for cannabis words. Addict Behav 38:2825–2832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.08.011
doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.08.011 pubmed: 24018225
Cousijn J, Wiers RW, Ridderinkhof RK et al (2014b) Effect of baseline cannabis use and working-memory network function on changes in cannabis use in heavy cannabis users: A prospective fMRI study. Hum Brain Mapp 35:2470–2482. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22342
doi: 10.1002/hbm.22342 pubmed: 24038570
Diaz MT, McCarthy G (2009) A comparison of brain activity evoked by single content and function words: An fMRI investigation of implicit word processing. Brain Res 1282:38–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2009.05.043
doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.05.043 pubmed: 19465009 pmcid: 2755079
Erk S, Kleczar A, Walter H (2007) Valence-specific regulation effects in a working memory task with emotional context. Neuroimage 37:623–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.05.006
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.05.006 pubmed: 17570686
Field M (2005) Cannabis “dependence” and attentional bias for cannabis-related words. Behav Pharmacol 16:473–476. https://doi.org/10.1097/00008877-200509000-00021
doi: 10.1097/00008877-200509000-00021 pubmed: 16148453
First MB (2015) Structured clinical interview for the DSM (SCID) . In: The Encyclopedia of Clinical Psychology
Garavan H (2010) Insula and drug cravings. Brain Struct Funct 214:593–601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-010-0259-8
doi: 10.1007/s00429-010-0259-8 pubmed: 20512373
Goldstein RZ, Volkow ND (2011) Dysfunction of the prefrontal cortex in addiction: neuroimaging findings and clinical implications. Nat Rev Neurosci 12:652–669. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3119
doi: 10.1038/nrn3119 pubmed: 22011681 pmcid: 3462342
Griffith-Lendering MFH, Huijbregts SCJ, Vollebergh WAM, Swaab H (2012) Motivational and cognitive inhibitory control in recreational cannabis users. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 34:688–697. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2012.668874
doi: 10.1080/13803395.2012.668874 pubmed: 22439979
Grimm S, Weigand A, Kazzer P et al (2012) Neural mechanisms underlying the integration of emotion and working memory. Neuroimage 61:1188–1194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.004
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.004 pubmed: 22521253
Guidali G, Pisoni A, Bolognini N, Papagno C (2019) Keeping order in the brain: the supramarginal gyrus and serial order in short-term memory. Cortex 119:89–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2019.04.009
doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.04.009 pubmed: 31091486
Hartman RL, Huestis MA (2013) Cannabis effects on driving skills. Clin Chem 59:478–492. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2012.194381
doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2012.194381 pubmed: 23220273
Hatchard T, Byron-Alhassan A, Mioduszewski O et al (2020) Working overtime: altered functional connectivity in working memory following regular cannabis use in young adults. Int J Ment Health Addict. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-020-00226-y
doi: 10.1007/s11469-020-00226-y
Heatherton T, Kozlowski L, Frecker R, Fagerström K (1991) The fagerström test for nicotine dependence: a revision of the Fagerström Tolerance Questionnaire. Br J Addict 86:1119–1127
doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1991.tb01879.x
Huang AS, Mitchell JA, Haber SN, et al (2018) The thalamus in drug addiction: from rodents to humans. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 373:20170028.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0028
Iordan AD, Dolcos S, Dolcos F (2013) Neural signatures of the response to emotional distraction: a review of evidence from brain imaging investigations. Front Hum Neurosci 7:1–21. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00200
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00200
Källmén H, Elgán TH, Wennberg P, Berman AH (2019) Concurrent validity of the alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT) in relation to alcohol use disorder (AUD) severity levels according to the brief DSM-5 AUD diagnostic assessment screener. Nord J Psychiatry 73:397–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039488.2019.1642382
doi: 10.1080/08039488.2019.1642382 pubmed: 31347426
Kanayama G, Rogowska J, Pope HG et al (2004) Spatial working memory in heavy cannabis users: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Psychopharmacology 176:239–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-004-1885-8
doi: 10.1007/s00213-004-1885-8 pubmed: 15205869
Kober H, Devito EE, Deleone CM et al (2014) Cannabis abstinence during treatment and one-year follow-up: Relationship to neural activity in men. Neuropsychopharmacology 39:2288–2298. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2014.82
doi: 10.1038/npp.2014.82 pubmed: 24705568 pmcid: 4138744
Koenigs M, Barbey AK, Postle BR, Grafman J (2009) Superior parietal cortex is critical for the manipulation of information in working memory. J Neurosci 29:14980–14986. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3706-09.2009
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3706-09.2009 pubmed: 19940193 pmcid: 2799248
Koob GF, Volkow ND (2010) Neurocircuitry of addiction. Neuropsychopharmacology 35:217–238. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2009.110
doi: 10.1038/npp.2009.110 pubmed: 19710631
Kuchinke L, Jacobs AM, Grubich C et al (2005) Incidental effects of emotional valence in single word processing: an fMRI study. Neuroimage 28:1022–1032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.06.050
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.06.050 pubmed: 16084739
Linden DEJ, Bittner RA, Muckli L et al (2003) Cortical capacity constraints for visual working memory: dissociation of fMRI load effects in a fronto-parietal network. Neuroimage 20:1518–1530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.07.021
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.07.021 pubmed: 14642464
Mackworth JF (1959) Paced memorization in a continuous task. J Exp Psychol 58(3):206–211. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0049090
doi: 10.1037/h0049090 pubmed: 14419552
Mclean SP, Garza JP, Wiebe SA et al (2014) Applying the flanker task to political psychology: a research note. Polit Psychol 35:831–840. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12056
doi: 10.1111/pops.12056
Owen AM, McMillan KM, Laird AR, Bullmore E (2005) N-back working memory paradigm: a meta-analysis of normative functional neuroimaging studies. Hum Brain Mapp 25:46–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20131
doi: 10.1002/hbm.20131 pubmed: 15846822 pmcid: 6871745
Peters SK, Dunlop K, Downar J (2016) Cortico-striatal-thalamic loop circuits of the salience network: a central pathway in psychiatric disease and treatment. Front Syst Neurosci 10:1–23. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2016.00104
doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2016.00104
Poldrack RA, Baker CI, Durnez J et al (2017) Scanning the horizon: towards transparent and reproducible neuroimaging research. Nat Rev Neurosci 18:115–126. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2016.167
doi: 10.1038/nrn.2016.167 pubmed: 28053326 pmcid: 6910649
R Core Team (2013) R: A language and environment for statistical computing
Robinson TE, Berridge KC (1993) The neural basis of drug craving: an incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Res Rev 18:247–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0173(93)90013-P
doi: 10.1016/0165-0173(93)90013-P pubmed: 8401595
Saadon-Grosman N, Loewenstein Y, Arzy S (2020) The ‘creatures’ of the human cortical somatosensory system. Brain Commun 2:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcaa003
doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaa003
Sandra Kooij JJ, Marije Boonstra A, Swinkels SHN et al (2008) Reliability, validity, and utility of instruments for self-report and informant report concerning symptoms of ADHD in adult patients. J Atten Disord 11:445–458. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054707299367
doi: 10.1177/1087054707299367 pubmed: 18083961
Saunders JB, Aasland OG, Babor TF et al (1993) Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO Collaborative Project on Early Detection of Persons with Harmful Alcohol Consumption-II. Addiction 88:791–804. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb02093.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb02093.x pubmed: 8329970
Schneider W, Eschman A, Zuccolotto A (2002) E-prime computer software and manual. Pittsburgh, PA Psychol Softw Tools
Schoeler T, Bhattacharyya S (2013) The effect of cannabis use on memory function: an update. Subst Abuse Rehabil 4:11–27. https://doi.org/10.2147/SAR.S25869
doi: 10.2147/SAR.S25869 pubmed: 24648785 pmcid: 3931635
Shapiro K, Hillstrom AP (2002) Control of visuotemporal attention by inferior parietal and superior temporal cortex. Curr Biol 12:1320–1325. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(02)01040-0
doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)01040-0 pubmed: 12176361
Smith AM, Longo CA, Fried PA et al (2010) Effects of marijuana on visuospatial working memory: an fMRI Study in young adults. Psychopharmacology 210:429–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-010-1841-8
doi: 10.1007/s00213-010-1841-8 pubmed: 20401748
Spielberger CD, Sydeman SJ (1994) State-trait anxiety inventory and state-trait anger expression inventory. In: The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcome assessment
Stoeckel C, Gough PM, Watkins KE, Devlin JT (2009) Supramarginal gyrus involvement in visual word recognition. Cortex 45:1091–1096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2008.12.004
doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2008.12.004 pubmed: 19232583 pmcid: 2726132
Trujillo N, Gómez D, Trujillo S et al (2021) Attentional bias during emotional processing: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence from an emotional flanker task. PLoS ONE 16:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249407
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249407
Unsworth N, Engle RW (2007) The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory. Psychol Rev 114:104–132. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.104
doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.104 pubmed: 17227183
Vandenberghe R, Molenberghs P, Gillebert CR (2012) Spatial attention deficits in humans: the critical role of superior compared to inferior parietal lesions. Neuropsychologia 50:1092–1103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.12.016
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.12.016 pubmed: 22266260
Wechsler D (2012) WAIS-IV-NL: Wechsler adult intelligence scale -Nederlandstalige bewerking
Wolpert DM, Goodbody SJ, Husain M (1998) Maintaining internal representations: the role of the human superior parietal lobe. Nat Neurosci 1:529–533. https://doi.org/10.1038/2245
doi: 10.1038/2245 pubmed: 10196553
Zhou X, Zimmermann K, Xin F et al (2019) Cue reactivity in the ventral striatum characterizes heavy cannabis use, whereas reactivity in the dorsal striatum mediates dependent use. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging 4:751–762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2019.04.006
doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2019.04.006 pubmed: 31204249

Auteurs

Emese Kroon (E)

Neuroscience of Addiction (NofA) Lab, Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, P.O. box 15916, 1001 NK, Amsterdam, Netherlands. e.kroon@uva.nl.
The Amsterdam Brain and Cognition Center (ABC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands. e.kroon@uva.nl.

Lauren Kuhns (L)

Neuroscience of Addiction (NofA) Lab, Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, P.O. box 15916, 1001 NK, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
The Amsterdam Brain and Cognition Center (ABC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Janna Cousijn (J)

Neuroscience of Addiction (NofA) Lab, Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, P.O. box 15916, 1001 NK, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
The Amsterdam Brain and Cognition Center (ABC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Department of Psychology, Education & Child Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Articles similaires

Humans Ketamine Propofol Pulmonary Atelectasis Female
Humans Magnetic Resonance Imaging Phantoms, Imaging Infant, Newborn Signal-To-Noise Ratio

Cannabis Use During Early Pregnancy Following Recreational Cannabis Legalization.

Kelly C Young-Wolff, Natalie E Slama, Lyndsay A Avalos et al.
1.00
Humans Female Pregnancy California Adult
1.00
Humans Magnetic Resonance Imaging Brain Infant, Newborn Infant, Premature

Classifications MeSH