Quality improvement in the undergraduate medical curriculum: the need for clinical exposure.
Medical education
Patient safety
Quality improvement
Journal
BMC medical education
ISSN: 1472-6920
Titre abrégé: BMC Med Educ
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088679
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Sep 2021
01 Sep 2021
Historique:
received:
29
05
2020
accepted:
16
02
2021
entrez:
2
9
2021
pubmed:
3
9
2021
medline:
4
9
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This correspondence article aims to outline the importance of an integrated clinical component within Quality Improvement education in response to the recently published article by Shah et al.. The Quality Improvement and Patient Safety workshops described in the above study were compared with the Quality Improvement module experienced by medical students at King's College London. The key difference between the two methods of teaching Quality Improvement was the clinical project undertaken by King's College Students, which helped students gain an appreciation of the pitfalls of instigating change in a clinical environment. The authors feel that this arguably more authentic experience could have benefited the students in the study in making them feel better equipped to use the skills learned in the theoretical workshops in their later careers.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34470626
doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02566-2
pii: 10.1186/s12909-021-02566-2
pmc: PMC8411518
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
467Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
BMC Med Educ. 2013 Feb 05;13:16
pubmed: 23379673
Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2016 Jul-Sep;6(3):195-200
pubmed: 27563587
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Apr 23;20(1):126
pubmed: 32326951