Overview, consequences, and strategies for overcoming matrix effects in LC-MS analysis: a critical review.


Journal

The Analyst
ISSN: 1364-5528
Titre abrégé: Analyst
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0372652

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 Oct 2021
Historique:
pubmed: 22 9 2021
medline: 14 10 2021
entrez: 21 9 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) technique is widely applied to routine analysis in many matrices. Despite the enormous application of LC/MS, this technique is subjected to drawbacks called matrix effects (MEs) that could lead to ion suppression or ion enhancement. This phenomenon can exert a deleterious impact on the ionization efficacy of an analyte and subsequently on the important method performance parameters. LC-MS susceptibility to MEs is the main challenge of this technique in the analysis of complex matrices such as biological and food samples. Nowadays, the assessment, estimation, and overcoming of the MEs before developing a method is mandatory in any analysis. Two main approaches including the post-column infusion and post-extraction spike are proposed to determine the degree of MEs. Different strategies can be adopted to reduce or eliminate MEs depending on the complexity of the matrix. This could be done by improving extraction and clean-up methods, changing the type of ionization employed, optimization of liquid chromatography conditions, and using corrective calibration methods. This review article will provide an overview of the MEs as the Achilles heel of the LC-MS technique, the causes of ME occurrence, their consequences, and systemic approaches towards overcoming MEs during LC-MS-based multi-analyte procedures.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34546235
doi: 10.1039/d1an01047f
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

6049-6063

Auteurs

Azadeh Nasiri (A)

Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Pharmacy Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Food Safety Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Reza Jahani (R)

Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Pharmacy Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Shaya Mokhtari (S)

Central Research Laboratories, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. farzadkf@yahoo.com.
Phytochemistry Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Hassan Yazdanpanah (H)

Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Pharmacy Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Food Safety Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Bahram Daraei (B)

Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Pharmacy Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Mehrdad Faizi (M)

Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Pharmacy Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Farzad Kobarfard (F)

Department of Medicinal Chemistry, School of Pharmacy, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Phytochemistry Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Central Research Laboratories, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. farzadkf@yahoo.com.

Articles similaires

Cicer Germination Proteolysis Seeds Plant Proteins
Humans Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid Acetaminophen COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2
Humans Pisum sativum Breast Neoplasms Tandem Mass Spectrometry Plant Extracts

Classifications MeSH