Exploring potential mediators of the cardiovascular benefit of dulaglutide in type 2 diabetes patients in REWIND.


Journal

Cardiovascular diabetology
ISSN: 1475-2840
Titre abrégé: Cardiovasc Diabetol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101147637

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
25 09 2021
Historique:
received: 12 07 2021
accepted: 21 09 2021
entrez: 26 9 2021
pubmed: 27 9 2021
medline: 8 2 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The REWIND trial demonstrated cardiovascular (CV) benefits to patients with type 2 diabetes and multiple CV risk factors or established CV disease. This exploratory analysis evaluated the degree to which the effect of dulaglutide on CV risk factors could statistically account for its effects on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in the REWIND trial. Potential mediators of established CV risk factors that were significantly reduced by dulaglutide were assessed in a post hoc analysis using repeated measures mixed models and included glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), body weight, waist-to-hip ratio, systolic blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and urine albumin/creatinine ratio (UACR). These factors, for which the change in level during follow-up was significantly associated with incident MACE, were identified using Cox regression modeling. Each identified variable was then included as a covariate in the Cox model assessing the effect of dulaglutide on MACE to estimate the degree to which the hazard ratio of dulaglutide vs placebo was attenuated. The combined effect of the variables associated with attenuation was assessed by including all variables in an additional Cox model. Although all evaluated variables were significantly improved by treatment, only changes in HbA1c and UACR were associated with MACE and a reduction in the effect of dulaglutide on this outcome was observed. The observed hazard ratio for MACE for dulaglutide vs placebo reduced by 36.1% by the updated mean HbA1c, and by 28.5% by the updated mean UACR. A similar pattern was observed for change from baseline in HbA1c and UACR and a reduction of 16.7% and 25.4%, respectively in the hazard ratio for MACE with dulaglutide vs placebo was observed. When HbA1c and UACR were both included, the observed hazard ratio reduced by 65.4% for the updated mean and 41.7% for the change from baseline with no HbA1c-UACR interaction (P interaction = 0.75 and 0.15, respectively). Treatment-induced improvement in HbA1c and UACR, but not changes in weight, systolic blood pressure, or LDL cholesterol, appear to partly mediate the beneficial effects of dulaglutide on MACE outcomes. These observations suggest that the proven effects of dulaglutide on cardiovascular disease benefit are partially related to changes in glycemic control and albuminuria, with residual unexplained benefit. Clinicaltrials.gov; Trial registration number: NCT01394952. URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01394952.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The REWIND trial demonstrated cardiovascular (CV) benefits to patients with type 2 diabetes and multiple CV risk factors or established CV disease. This exploratory analysis evaluated the degree to which the effect of dulaglutide on CV risk factors could statistically account for its effects on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in the REWIND trial.
METHODS
Potential mediators of established CV risk factors that were significantly reduced by dulaglutide were assessed in a post hoc analysis using repeated measures mixed models and included glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), body weight, waist-to-hip ratio, systolic blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and urine albumin/creatinine ratio (UACR). These factors, for which the change in level during follow-up was significantly associated with incident MACE, were identified using Cox regression modeling. Each identified variable was then included as a covariate in the Cox model assessing the effect of dulaglutide on MACE to estimate the degree to which the hazard ratio of dulaglutide vs placebo was attenuated. The combined effect of the variables associated with attenuation was assessed by including all variables in an additional Cox model.
RESULTS
Although all evaluated variables were significantly improved by treatment, only changes in HbA1c and UACR were associated with MACE and a reduction in the effect of dulaglutide on this outcome was observed. The observed hazard ratio for MACE for dulaglutide vs placebo reduced by 36.1% by the updated mean HbA1c, and by 28.5% by the updated mean UACR. A similar pattern was observed for change from baseline in HbA1c and UACR and a reduction of 16.7% and 25.4%, respectively in the hazard ratio for MACE with dulaglutide vs placebo was observed. When HbA1c and UACR were both included, the observed hazard ratio reduced by 65.4% for the updated mean and 41.7% for the change from baseline with no HbA1c-UACR interaction (P interaction = 0.75 and 0.15, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS
Treatment-induced improvement in HbA1c and UACR, but not changes in weight, systolic blood pressure, or LDL cholesterol, appear to partly mediate the beneficial effects of dulaglutide on MACE outcomes. These observations suggest that the proven effects of dulaglutide on cardiovascular disease benefit are partially related to changes in glycemic control and albuminuria, with residual unexplained benefit. Clinicaltrials.gov; Trial registration number: NCT01394952. URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01394952.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34563178
doi: 10.1186/s12933-021-01386-4
pii: 10.1186/s12933-021-01386-4
pmc: PMC8466679
doi:

Substances chimiques

Biomarkers 0
Blood Glucose 0
Glycated Hemoglobin A 0
Hypoglycemic Agents 0
Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments 0
Recombinant Fusion Proteins 0
hemoglobin A1c protein, human 0
Glucagon-Like Peptides 62340-29-8
Creatinine AYI8EX34EU
dulaglutide WTT295HSY5

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01394952']

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

194

Informations de copyright

© 2021. The Author(s).

Références

Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2017 Mar;16(3):351-363
pubmed: 28102093
Endocr Pract. 2020 Jan;26(1):107-139
pubmed: 32022600
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2014 Oct 22;13:142
pubmed: 25338737
J Clin Med. 2020 Mar 30;9(4):
pubmed: 32235471
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Mar;21(3):499-508
pubmed: 30284349
Diabetes Care. 2020 Jul;43(7):1546-1552
pubmed: 32366578
Diabetes Care. 2018 Feb;41(2):356-363
pubmed: 29203583
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019 Oct;7(10):776-785
pubmed: 31422062
Lancet. 2019 Jul 13;394(10193):121-130
pubmed: 31189511
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020 Mar;22(3):442-451
pubmed: 31903692
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jul 28;375(4):311-22
pubmed: 27295427
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Mar 29;12:645566
pubmed: 33854484
Diabetes Care. 2021 Jan;44(Suppl 1):S111-S124
pubmed: 33298420
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Jun 18;8(12):e012356
pubmed: 31166153
N Engl J Med. 2017 Mar 2;376(9):891-2
pubmed: 28249135
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020 Feb;8(2):106-114
pubmed: 31924562
Eur Heart J. 2020 Jan 7;41(2):255-323
pubmed: 31497854
Lancet. 2018 Oct 27;392(10157):1519-1529
pubmed: 30291013
N Engl J Med. 2019 Aug 29;381(9):841-851
pubmed: 31185157
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2017 Jan 7;9:3
pubmed: 28074109
N Engl J Med. 2015 Dec 3;373(23):2247-57
pubmed: 26630143
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Jan;20(1):42-49
pubmed: 28573765
Circulation. 2019 Sep 10;140(11):e596-e646
pubmed: 30879355
N Engl J Med. 2017 Sep 28;377(13):1228-1239
pubmed: 28910237

Auteurs

Manige Konig (M)

Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, IN, 46285, USA. konig_manige@lilly.com.

Matthew C Riddle (MC)

Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, USA.

Helen M Colhoun (HM)

University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Kelley R Branch (KR)

University of Washington, Seattle, USA.

Charles M Atisso (CM)

Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, IN, 46285, USA.

Mark C Lakshmanan (MC)

Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, IN, 46285, USA.

Reema Mody (R)

Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, IN, 46285, USA.

Sohini Raha (S)

Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, IN, 46285, USA.

Hertzel C Gerstein (HC)

McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH