The Predictive Value of Degree of Preference for Extended-Release Naltrexone for Treatment Adherence, Opioid Use, and Relapse.


Journal

European addiction research
ISSN: 1421-9891
Titre abrégé: Eur Addict Res
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 9502920

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 03 02 2021
accepted: 12 07 2021
pubmed: 28 9 2021
medline: 11 1 2022
entrez: 27 9 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX) is effective for illicit opioid abstinence as an opioid maintenance treatment. To improve treatment outcomes, patient's preference for the modality of treatment is an important factor. We aimed to test the relationship between baseline preference for XR-NTX and adherence to treatment, use of illicit opioids, and risk of relapse. In an open-label, Norwegian clinical trial participants with opioid use disorder were randomized to either monthly injections with XR-NTX or daily sublingual buprenorphine-naloxone (BP-NLX) for 12 weeks. Subsequently, participants could continue with their preferred medication in a 36-week follow-up and in a prolonged period of 104 weeks. Of 153 participants who completed detoxification, 72% were men, with a mean age of 36 years. Preference levels were similar across the randomized groups, with no significant associations between preference and adherence to treatment, opioid use, or relapse. The BP-NLX group had a significantly higher risk of first relapse to opioids than the XR-NTX group for all levels of preference (p < 0.001) and a significantly higher number of days of illicit opioid use. In the follow-up period, the adherence rate was twice as high among participants with the highest preference compared to participants with the lowest preference, both among those who switched to XR-NTX and those who continued (hazard ratio 2.2; 1.2-4.0, p = 0.013). Opioid use was significantly higher among participants who switched to XR-NTX with the lowest preference than the medium (p = 0.003) or the highest (p = 0.001) preference. The risk of relapse to opioids, however, was significantly higher among XR-NTX continuing participants with the lowest (p = 0.002) or the medium (p = 0.043) preference than those with the highest preference. Individuals who matched with their preferred treatment used less illicit opioids than those who did not during short-term treatment. However, baseline preference for XR-NTX treatment primarily influenced longer term opioid use and treatment adherence.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX) is effective for illicit opioid abstinence as an opioid maintenance treatment. To improve treatment outcomes, patient's preference for the modality of treatment is an important factor.
OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE
We aimed to test the relationship between baseline preference for XR-NTX and adherence to treatment, use of illicit opioids, and risk of relapse.
METHODS METHODS
In an open-label, Norwegian clinical trial participants with opioid use disorder were randomized to either monthly injections with XR-NTX or daily sublingual buprenorphine-naloxone (BP-NLX) for 12 weeks. Subsequently, participants could continue with their preferred medication in a 36-week follow-up and in a prolonged period of 104 weeks.
RESULTS RESULTS
Of 153 participants who completed detoxification, 72% were men, with a mean age of 36 years. Preference levels were similar across the randomized groups, with no significant associations between preference and adherence to treatment, opioid use, or relapse. The BP-NLX group had a significantly higher risk of first relapse to opioids than the XR-NTX group for all levels of preference (p < 0.001) and a significantly higher number of days of illicit opioid use. In the follow-up period, the adherence rate was twice as high among participants with the highest preference compared to participants with the lowest preference, both among those who switched to XR-NTX and those who continued (hazard ratio 2.2; 1.2-4.0, p = 0.013). Opioid use was significantly higher among participants who switched to XR-NTX with the lowest preference than the medium (p = 0.003) or the highest (p = 0.001) preference. The risk of relapse to opioids, however, was significantly higher among XR-NTX continuing participants with the lowest (p = 0.002) or the medium (p = 0.043) preference than those with the highest preference.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Individuals who matched with their preferred treatment used less illicit opioids than those who did not during short-term treatment. However, baseline preference for XR-NTX treatment primarily influenced longer term opioid use and treatment adherence.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34569487
pii: 000518436
doi: 10.1159/000518436
doi:

Substances chimiques

Analgesics, Opioid 0
Delayed-Action Preparations 0
Narcotic Antagonists 0
Naltrexone 5S6W795CQM

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

56-67

Informations de copyright

© 2021 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Auteurs

Zhanna Gaulen (Z)

Department of Addiction Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Department of Clinical Dentistry, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

Ida Halvorsen Brenna (IH)

Department of Addiction Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Department of Psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

Lars Thore Fadnes (LT)

Department of Addiction Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

Jūratė Šaltytė Benth (J)

Institute of Clinical Medicine, Campus Ahus, University of Oslo, Blindern, Norway.
Health Services Research Unit, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.

Kristin K Solli (KK)

Department of Research and Development in Mental Health, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Norwegian Center for Addiction Research, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tonsberg, Norway.

Nikolaj Kunoe (N)

Norwegian Center for Addiction Research, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Lovisenberg Diaconal Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Arild Opheim (A)

Department of Addiction Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

Lars Tanum (L)

Department of Research and Development in Mental Health, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Department of Health Science, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH