A genetic approach reveals different modes of action of prefoldins.
Journal
Plant physiology
ISSN: 1532-2548
Titre abrégé: Plant Physiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0401224
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 11 2021
03 11 2021
Historique:
received:
30
04
2021
accepted:
05
07
2021
pubmed:
8
10
2021
medline:
11
3
2022
entrez:
7
10
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The prefoldin complex (PFDc) was identified in humans as a co-chaperone of the cytosolic chaperonin T-COMPLEX PROTEIN RING COMPLEX (TRiC)/CHAPERONIN CONTAINING TCP-1 (CCT). PFDc is conserved in eukaryotes and is composed of subunits PFD1-6, and PFDc-TRiC/CCT folds actin and tubulins. PFDs also participate in a wide range of cellular processes, both in the cytoplasm and in the nucleus, and their malfunction causes developmental alterations and disease in animals and altered growth and environmental responses in yeast and plants. Genetic analyses in yeast indicate that not all of their functions require the canonical complex. The lack of systematic genetic analyses in plants and animals, however, makes it difficult to discern whether PFDs participate in a process as the canonical complex or in alternative configurations, which is necessary to understand their mode of action. To tackle this question, and on the premise that the canonical complex cannot be formed if one subunit is missing, we generated an Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) mutant deficient in the six PFDs and compared various growth and environmental responses with those of the individual mutants. In this way, we demonstrate that the PFDc is required for seed germination, to delay flowering, or to respond to high salt stress or low temperature, whereas at least two PFDs redundantly attenuate the response to osmotic stress. A coexpression analysis of differentially expressed genes in the sextuple mutant identified several transcription factors, including ABA INSENSITIVE 5 (ABI5) and PHYTOCHROME-INTERACTING FACTOR 4, acting downstream of PFDs. Furthermore, the transcriptomic analysis allowed assigning additional roles for PFDs, for instance, in response to higher temperature.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34618031
pii: 6326811
doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiab348
pmc: PMC8566299
doi:
Substances chimiques
Arabidopsis Proteins
0
Molecular Chaperones
0
Transcription Factors
0
prefoldin
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1534-1550Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of American Society of Plant Biologists.
Références
Protein Sci. 2002 Feb;11(2):430-48
pubmed: 11790853
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Dec 16;7:1884
pubmed: 28018412
J Biol Chem. 2001 Nov 30;276(48):45137-44
pubmed: 11567024
Nature. 2012 Mar 21;484(7393):242-245
pubmed: 22437497
Cell. 2019 Apr 18;177(3):751-765.e15
pubmed: 30955883
Mol Cells. 2016 Aug 31;39(8):587-93
pubmed: 27432188
Sci Rep. 2018 Sep 12;8(1):13712
pubmed: 30209338
Cell. 1998 May 29;93(5):863-73
pubmed: 9630229
Nat Plants. 2016 Jan 06;2:15190
pubmed: 27250752
Oncogene. 2017 Feb 16;36(7):885-898
pubmed: 27694898
Nucleic Acids Res. 2012 Jan;40(Database issue):D1211-5
pubmed: 22080561
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Apr 3;115(14):3716-3721
pubmed: 29463731
EMBO J. 1998 Feb 16;17(4):952-66
pubmed: 9463374
Cell. 2000 Nov 10;103(4):621-32
pubmed: 11106732
J Cell Biol. 1993 Sep;122(6):1301-10
pubmed: 8104191
Oncogene. 2019 Jun;38(24):4739-4754
pubmed: 30792539
Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 Apr 6;46(6):e31
pubmed: 29272447
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2004 May;5(5):410-5
pubmed: 15122354
EMBO J. 2002 Dec 2;21(23):6377-86
pubmed: 12456645
Mol Plant. 2018 Jul 2;11(7):928-942
pubmed: 29729397
Mol Plant. 2009 May;2(3):526-34
pubmed: 19825635
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Apr 10;109(15):5729-34
pubmed: 22451918
Genes Dev. 2018 Dec 1;32(23-24):1562-1575
pubmed: 30478249
J Exp Bot. 2019 Jan 1;70(1):17-27
pubmed: 30239806
Nat Plants. 2019 Mar;5(3):316-327
pubmed: 30833711
Plant J. 2001 Jul;27(1):1-12
pubmed: 11489178
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 22;7(1):9148
pubmed: 28831141
J Biol Chem. 2011 Jan 7;286(1):726-36
pubmed: 20956523
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Dec 13;108(50):20231-5
pubmed: 22123947
PLoS Genet. 2013;9(9):e1003776
pubmed: 24068951
Plant J. 2004 Sep;39(6):920-32
pubmed: 15341634
Mol Plant. 2009 Jul;2(4):565-577
pubmed: 19825639
Plant J. 2010 Jul;63(2):229-40
pubmed: 20409007
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Nov 18;105(46):18064-9
pubmed: 19004800
Cell Biosci. 2020 Jul 20;10:87
pubmed: 32699605
PLoS Genet. 2012;8(3):e1002594
pubmed: 22479194
Mol Plant. 2017 Jun 5;10(6):791-804
pubmed: 28412546
PLoS One. 2007 Aug 08;2(8):e718
pubmed: 17684564
J Biol Chem. 2001 Dec 7;276(49):46562-7
pubmed: 11585818
Plant Physiol. 1997 May;114(1):295-305
pubmed: 9159952
Curr Biol. 2009 Mar 10;19(5):408-13
pubmed: 19249207
Dev Biol. 2008 Jan 1;313(1):320-34
pubmed: 18062952
Nucleic Acids Res. 2021 Jun 21;49(11):6267-6280
pubmed: 34096575
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018;1106:95-108
pubmed: 30484155
Nat Protoc. 2015 Jan;10(1):169-87
pubmed: 25521792
Protein Sci. 2008 Nov;17(11):1881-93
pubmed: 18832340
EMBO J. 1999 Jan 4;18(1):75-84
pubmed: 9878052
Cell. 2010 Apr 30;141(3):550, 550.e1-2
pubmed: 20434991
New Phytol. 2012 Aug;195(3):707-720
pubmed: 22651224
Nucleic Acids Res. 2020 Jun 19;48(11):6280-6293
pubmed: 32396196
Plant Cell. 2001 Jul;13(7):1555-66
pubmed: 11449051
Biochim Biophys Acta Gene Regul Mech. 2017 Jul;1860(7):773-781
pubmed: 28457997
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018;1106:119-131
pubmed: 30484157
Curr Biol. 2013 May 6;23(9):804-9
pubmed: 23583555
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Sep 17;20(18):
pubmed: 31533258