Wild emmer introgression alters root-to-shoot growth dynamics in durum wheat in response to water stress.


Journal

Plant physiology
ISSN: 1532-2548
Titre abrégé: Plant Physiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0401224

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 11 2021
Historique:
received: 29 04 2021
accepted: 07 06 2021
pubmed: 8 10 2021
medline: 8 3 2022
entrez: 7 10 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Water deficit during the early vegetative growth stages of wheat (Triticum) can limit shoot growth and ultimately impact grain productivity. Introducing diversity in wheat cultivars to enhance the range of phenotypic responses to water limitations during vegetative growth can provide potential avenues for mitigating subsequent yield losses. We tested this hypothesis in an elite durum wheat background by introducing a series of introgressions from a wild emmer (Triticum turgidum ssp. dicoccoides) wheat. Wild emmer populations harbor rich phenotypic diversity for drought-adaptive traits. To determine the effect of these introgressions on vegetative growth under water-limited conditions, we used image-based phenotyping to catalog divergent growth responses to water stress ranging from high plasticity to high stability. One of the introgression lines exhibited a significant shift in root-to-shoot ratio in response to water stress. We characterized this shift by combining genetic analysis and root transcriptome profiling to identify candidate genes (including a root-specific kinase) that may be linked to the root-to-shoot carbon reallocation under water stress. Our results highlight the potential of introducing functional diversity into elite durum wheat for enhancing the range of water stress adaptation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34618034
pii: 6306418
doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiab292
pmc: PMC8566259
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1149-1162

Informations de copyright

© American Society of Plant Biologists 2021. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Références

New Phytol. 2006;170(4):644-8
pubmed: 16684227
J Plant Physiol. 2013 Mar 15;170(5):505-15
pubmed: 23276523
Mol Plant. 2018 Jan 8;11(1):226-229
pubmed: 29056533
Plant Cell Environ. 2008 Jan;31(1):39-49
pubmed: 17908203
Genome Biol. 2014;15(12):550
pubmed: 25516281
PLoS Biol. 2010 Apr 27;8(4):e1000357
pubmed: 20463950
Trends Plant Sci. 2008 Apr;13(4):172-7
pubmed: 18343709
Front Plant Sci. 2017 May 09;8:703
pubmed: 28536586
Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2016 Apr 29;67:619-42
pubmed: 26905656
Science. 2017 Jul 7;357(6346):93-97
pubmed: 28684525
Science. 2018 Aug 17;361(6403):
pubmed: 30115783
Trends Plant Sci. 2011 Dec;16(12):635-44
pubmed: 22074787
Ann Bot. 2007 Nov;100(5):991-8
pubmed: 17940075
Euphytica. 2018;214(1):9
pubmed: 31187787
J Exp Bot. 2015 Jun;66(12):3477-86
pubmed: 25821073
Science. 2018 Aug 17;361(6403):
pubmed: 30115782
Plant Physiol. 2013 Apr;161(4):1806-19
pubmed: 23426195
Theor Appl Genet. 2021 Jun;134(6):1753-1769
pubmed: 33715017
Funct Plant Biol. 2016 Feb;44(1):143-153
pubmed: 32480553
J Exp Bot. 2011 Jan;62(3):1271-84
pubmed: 21172813
Nature. 2020 Dec;588(7837):277-283
pubmed: 33239791
Plant Physiol. 2016 Oct;172(2):622-634
pubmed: 27482076
Plant Cell Environ. 2018 Apr;41(4):755-766
pubmed: 29320605
Ann Bot. 2002 Jun;89 Spec No:925-40
pubmed: 12102518
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 1998 Jun;1(3):267-74
pubmed: 10066591
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2016 Apr;30:47-56
pubmed: 26874966
J Exp Bot. 2019 Nov 18;70(21):6019-6034
pubmed: 31504740
Plant Cell Environ. 2021 Jun;44(6):1921-1934
pubmed: 33629405
Nat Genet. 2019 May;51(5):885-895
pubmed: 30962619
Bioinformatics. 2009 May 1;25(9):1105-11
pubmed: 19289445
Breed Sci. 2021 Feb;71(1):3-12
pubmed: 33762871
Plant Mol Biol. 2011 May;76(1-2):69-83
pubmed: 21431781
Plant Methods. 2019 Sep 18;15:107
pubmed: 31548847
Plant Soil. 2020;452(1):587-600
pubmed: 32713967
Trends Plant Sci. 2009 Jan;14(1):51-8
pubmed: 19042147
J Exp Bot. 2016 Feb;67(4):1161-78
pubmed: 26880749
J Exp Bot. 2015 Sep;66(18):5519-30
pubmed: 26071535
Evolution. 2006 Dec;60(12):2478-89
pubmed: 17263110
Trends Plant Sci. 2018 Nov;23(11):957-960
pubmed: 30145109

Auteurs

Harel Bacher (H)

The Robert H. Smith Institute of Plant Sciences and Genetics in Agriculture, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, Israel.
Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA.

Feiyu Zhu (F)

Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA.

Tian Gao (T)

Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA.

Kan Liu (K)

School of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA.

Balpreet K Dhatt (BK)

Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA.

Tala Awada (T)

School of Natural Resources, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA.

Chi Zhang (C)

School of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA.

Assaf Distelfeld (A)

The Institute of Evolution, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.

Hongfeng Yu (H)

Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA.

Zvi Peleg (Z)

The Robert H. Smith Institute of Plant Sciences and Genetics in Agriculture, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, Israel.

Harkamal Walia (H)

Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA.

Articles similaires

Drought Resistance Gene Expression Profiling Gene Expression Regulation, Plant Gossypium Multigene Family
Fragaria Light Plant Leaves Osmosis Stress, Physiological
Animals Natural Killer T-Cells Mice Adipose Tissue Lipid Metabolism
Animals Lung India Sheep Transcriptome

Classifications MeSH