Structures and performance characteristics of dermatology hospitals in Germany. Current status and long-term development.


Journal

Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG
ISSN: 1610-0387
Titre abrégé: J Dtsch Dermatol Ges
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101164708

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 2021
Historique:
received: 15 02 2021
accepted: 28 07 2021
entrez: 18 10 2021
pubmed: 19 10 2021
medline: 10 11 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The objective of the study was to characterize the performance of German dermatology hospitals. A structured survey questionnaire was sent out to all dermatology hospitals in October 2019 as part of a cross-sectional analysis based on health care research. Of the 115 hospitals, 95 (82.6 %) responded, including 34 (35.8 %) university hospitals (UC) and 61 (64.2 %) non-university hospitals (NUC), of which 78 % were urban (43 % UC, 57 % NUC) and 22 % rural (10 % UC, 90 % NUC). The dermatology departments comprised an average of 45 inpatient and 11 day-care beds (UC: 52/13, NUC: 40/9). An average of 2,302 inpatients were cared for in 2018 (UC: 2,874, NUC: 1,983), and the case mix index was 0.76 (UC: 0.74, NUC: 0.77, overall range: 0.40-0.96). Mean length of stay was 5.5 days for UC, relevantly lower than 2013 (5.9 days) and 2011 (7.1 days) data, and also significantly lower for NUC at 5.9 (2018) versus 5.1 days (2013). German dermatology hospitals continue to have a high volume of inpatient care, with a comparison of the last six years again showing a compression with shorter length of stay and higher occupancy density. Dermatological hospitals represent an essential pillar of dermatological care.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The objective of the study was to characterize the performance of German dermatology hospitals.
METHODS
A structured survey questionnaire was sent out to all dermatology hospitals in October 2019 as part of a cross-sectional analysis based on health care research.
RESULTS
Of the 115 hospitals, 95 (82.6 %) responded, including 34 (35.8 %) university hospitals (UC) and 61 (64.2 %) non-university hospitals (NUC), of which 78 % were urban (43 % UC, 57 % NUC) and 22 % rural (10 % UC, 90 % NUC). The dermatology departments comprised an average of 45 inpatient and 11 day-care beds (UC: 52/13, NUC: 40/9). An average of 2,302 inpatients were cared for in 2018 (UC: 2,874, NUC: 1,983), and the case mix index was 0.76 (UC: 0.74, NUC: 0.77, overall range: 0.40-0.96). Mean length of stay was 5.5 days for UC, relevantly lower than 2013 (5.9 days) and 2011 (7.1 days) data, and also significantly lower for NUC at 5.9 (2018) versus 5.1 days (2013).
CONCLUSIONS
German dermatology hospitals continue to have a high volume of inpatient care, with a comparison of the last six years again showing a compression with shorter length of stay and higher occupancy density. Dermatological hospitals represent an essential pillar of dermatological care.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34662487
doi: 10.1111/ddg.14618
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

5-12

Informations de copyright

© 2021 The Authors | © Deutsche Dermatologische Gesellschaft (DDG). Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Références

Augustin M, Reusch M. European Dermatology Health Care Survey [July 16, 2020]; Available from: https://www.dermasurvey.eu/wp-content/uploads/eu-derma-health-care-survey-2013-short.pdf.
Augustin M, Eissing L, Elsner P et al. Perception and image of dermatology in the German general population 2002-2014. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2017; 31: 2124-30.
Augustin M, Radtke MA, Augustin J. Psoriasis healthcare and facts in Europe: For decision makers and stakeholders. 1st ed., PsoNet, Hamburg, 2018.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). OECD Health Statistics 2020 [January 10, 2020]; Available from: http://www.oecd.org/els/health-systems/health-data.htm.
Beikert FC, Stadler R, Kaufmann R et al. Leistungsprofile der Deutschen Universitäts-Hautkliniken. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2013; 11: 170-7.
Schönbach KH, Schliemann B, Malzahn J et al. Zukunft der Bedarfsplanung und Gestaltung der Versorgung. Gesundheits- und Sozialpolitik 2011; 65: 11-20.
Verband der Universitätsklinika Deutschlands (VUD), BKK Dachverband (BKK DV), Verband der Ersatzkassen (vdek). Zukunft der Krankenhausversorgung - Neue Impulse für eine zielgerichtete Weiterentwicklung vom 23.06.2021. Gemeinsames Thesenpapier [July 21, 2021], Available from: https://www.uniklinika.de/fileadmin/user_upload/2021-06-23_Gemeinsames_Thesenpapier_Krankenhausversorgung_final.pdf.
Bormann R, Engelmann E, Franke E et al. Zukunft der Krankenhäuser. Mehr Qualität, flächendeckende Versorgung und gerechte Finanzierung. 2013 [July 21, 2021] Avaialable from: https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/wiso/10198.pdf.
Fürstenberg T, Gierling P, Irps S et al. DRG benchmarking: analysis of service structures and -differences in dermatology departments. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2014; 12: 594-604.

Auteurs

Gefion Girbig (G)

Institute for Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing (IVDP), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany.

Tilo Biedermann (T)

Department of Dermatology and Allergology Biederstein, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

Michael Hertl (M)

Clinic for Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital Marburg (UKGM), Marburg, Germany.

Peter Elsner (P)

Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany.

Julia Welzel (J)

Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Augsburg University Hospital, Augsburg, Germany.

Sandra Hischke (S)

Institute for Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing (IVDP), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany.

Laura Honak (L)

Institute for Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing (IVDP), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany.

Matthias Augustin (M)

Institute for Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing (IVDP), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH