DNA Double-Strand Breaks Induced in Human Cells by Twelve Metallic Species: Quantitative Inter-Comparisons and Influence of the ATM Protein.
Aluminum
/ pharmacology
Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Proteins
/ chemistry
Cadmium
/ pharmacology
Chromium
/ pharmacology
Copper
/ pharmacology
DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded
/ drug effects
DNA Repair
/ drug effects
Humans
Iron
/ pharmacology
Lead
/ pharmacology
Metals
/ chemistry
Nickel
/ pharmacology
Palladium
/ pharmacology
Zinc
/ pharmacology
ATM
DNA double-strand breaks
metal carcinogenesis
metal toxicity
Journal
Biomolecules
ISSN: 2218-273X
Titre abrégé: Biomolecules
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101596414
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 10 2021
05 10 2021
Historique:
received:
13
08
2021
revised:
29
09
2021
accepted:
02
10
2021
entrez:
23
10
2021
pubmed:
24
10
2021
medline:
19
1
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Despite a considerable amount of data, the molecular and cellular bases of the toxicity due to metal exposure remain unknown. Recent mechanistic models from radiobiology have emerged, pointing out that the radiation-induced nucleo-shuttling of the ATM protein (RIANS) initiates the recognition and the repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) and the final response to genotoxic stress. In order to document the role of ATM-dependent DSB repair and signalling after metal exposure, we applied twelve different metal species representing nine elements (Al, Cu, Zn Ni, Pd, Cd, Pb, Cr, and Fe) to human skin, mammary, and brain cells. Our findings suggest that metals may directly or indirectly induce DSB at a rate that depends on the metal properties and concentration, and tissue type. At specific metal concentration ranges, the nucleo-shuttling of ATM can be delayed which impairs DSB recognition and repair and contributes to toxicity and carcinogenicity. Interestingly, as observed after low doses of ionizing radiation, some phenomena equivalent to the biological response observed at high metal concentrations may occur at lower concentrations. A general mechanistic model of the biological response to metal exposure based on the nucleo-shuttling of ATM is proposed to describe the metal-induced stress response and to define quantitative endpoints for toxicity and carcinogenicity.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34680095
pii: biom11101462
doi: 10.3390/biom11101462
pmc: PMC8533583
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Metals
0
Cadmium
00BH33GNGH
Chromium
0R0008Q3JB
Lead
2P299V784P
Palladium
5TWQ1V240M
Copper
789U1901C5
Nickel
7OV03QG267
Aluminum
CPD4NFA903
Iron
E1UOL152H7
Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Proteins
EC 2.7.11.1
Zinc
J41CSQ7QDS
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001 Feb 1;49(2):379-89
pubmed: 11173131
Mol Neurobiol. 2014 Jun;49(3):1200-11
pubmed: 24277524
Mutat Res. 2008 Jun 30;654(1):13-21
pubmed: 18539077
Neurochem Res. 2008 Sep;33(9):1717-23
pubmed: 18307039
Cancers (Basel). 2019 Jun 28;11(7):
pubmed: 31261657
Int J Radiat Biol. 2011 Nov;87(11):1103-12
pubmed: 21797809
Int J Radiat Biol. 2008 Feb;84(2):107-25
pubmed: 18246480
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Sep 01;22(17):
pubmed: 34502420
Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med. 1981 Apr;39(4):395-408
pubmed: 6971848
Int J Radiat Biol. 1997 Sep;72(3):271-83
pubmed: 9298107
IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum. 2006;87:1-471
pubmed: 17191367
Mol Neurobiol. 2018 Jun;55(6):4973-4983
pubmed: 28786016
Food Chem Toxicol. 2019 Nov;133:110745
pubmed: 31376412
Environ Health Perspect. 2006 Aug;114(8):1293-6
pubmed: 16882542
Connect Tissue Res. 2010 Jun;51(3):224-9
pubmed: 20053132
Int J Radiat Biol. 2020 Mar;96(3):394-410
pubmed: 31738647
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Feb 1;100(2):353-360
pubmed: 29353653
EMBO J. 2003 Jun 2;22(11):2860-71
pubmed: 12773400
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 Nov 1;96(3):629-36
pubmed: 27681759
Indian J Exp Biol. ;54(8):502-8
pubmed: 28577517
Microb Cell. 2014 Apr 23;1(5):145-149
pubmed: 28357236
Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res. 2016 Oct - Dec;770(Pt B):369-386
pubmed: 27919342
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 11;11(3):e0151367
pubmed: 26966913
Biochimie. 2006 Nov;88(11):1549-59
pubmed: 17070979
J Theor Biol. 2013 Sep 21;333:135-45
pubmed: 23735818
Toxicol Lett. 2007 Sep 28;173(3):201-14
pubmed: 17855027
Curr Alzheimer Res. 2008 Dec;5(6):500-7
pubmed: 19075576
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 Mar 1;94(3):450-60
pubmed: 26867874
Dose Response. 2018 Aug 06;16(3):1559325818789836
pubmed: 30093841
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Mar 1;103(3):709-718
pubmed: 30342967
Int J Radiat Biol. 1996 Feb;69(2):241-9
pubmed: 8609461
Nature. 2005 Sep 22;437(7058):564-8
pubmed: 16079796
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Jul 02;22(13):
pubmed: 34281212
Biol Trace Elem Res. 2012 Feb;145(2):257-67
pubmed: 21882070
Annu Rev Biochem. 2015;84:711-38
pubmed: 25580527
Int J Radiat Biol. 2016;92(3):117-31
pubmed: 26907628
Methods Mol Biol. 2009;472:139-67
pubmed: 19107432
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2004 Feb 5;800(1-2):169-73
pubmed: 14698251
Wound Repair Regen. 2004 May-Jun;12(3):368-73
pubmed: 15225216
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 26;8(6):e67501
pubmed: 23840724
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Jul 1;101(3):690-693
pubmed: 29893278
Biometals. 1995 Jan;8(1):3-11
pubmed: 7865990
Toxicol Sci. 2015 Jan;143(1):54-63
pubmed: 25288669
J Synchrotron Radiat. 2011 May;18(Pt 3):456-63
pubmed: 21525655
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Oct 26;20(21):
pubmed: 31717816
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Apr 29;100(9):5057-62
pubmed: 12679524
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Jan 30;20(3):
pubmed: 30704035
IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum. 1993;58:1-415
pubmed: 8022054
Hum Exp Toxicol. 2010 Apr;29(4):249-61
pubmed: 20332169
Int J Radiat Biol. 2020 Mar;96(3):297-323
pubmed: 31852363
Environ Pollut. 2003;124(2):257-62
pubmed: 12713925
Biometals. 2001 Sep-Dec;14(3-4):331-41
pubmed: 11831463
Environ Health Perspect. 1992 Jul;97:259-67
pubmed: 1396465
Int J Radiat Biol. 2007 Mar;83(3):195-210
pubmed: 17378528
Nat Med. 2008 Jul;14(7):767-72
pubmed: 18587406
Int J Radiat Biol. 2007 Aug;83(8):543-9
pubmed: 17613127
Am J Epidemiol. 1998 Apr 1;147(7):660-9
pubmed: 9554605