Is extended release naltrexone superior to buprenorphine-naloxone to reduce drinking among outpatients receiving treatment for opioid use disorder? A secondary analysis of the CTN X:BOT trial.


Journal

Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research
ISSN: 1530-0277
Titre abrégé: Alcohol Clin Exp Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7707242

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 2021
Historique:
revised: 01 10 2021
received: 03 06 2021
accepted: 21 10 2021
pubmed: 27 10 2021
medline: 23 3 2022
entrez: 26 10 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The comparative effectiveness of extended-release naltrexone versus buprenorphine-naloxone for opioid relapse prevention (X:BOT) trial showed that following induction, treatment with the sublingual agonist (buprenorphine-naloxone, BUP-NX) or injected antagonist (extended release naltrexone, XR-NTX) produced similar reductions in opioid relapse in injection users with opioid use disorder (OUD). Because XR-NTX reduces drinking in alcohol use disorder (AUD), we conducted a secondary analysis of the X:BOT sample of patients successfully inducted onto treatment to determine whether XR-NTX (n = 204) was superior to BUP-NX (n = 270) in reducing drinking or heavy drinking in patients with OUD. Standard drink units consumed were measured using the Timeline Follow-back method. Mixed-models regression was used to examine the monthly frequency of any drinking and heavy drinking over 6 months of treatment. We used a proportional hazard survival analysis to examine the time to first drink. Both treatment groups reduced drinking from baseline to posttreatment (small to medium effect), but no differences between groups were detected. However, only 29% (n = 136) of the sample had AUD and 19% (n = 26/136) of those were abstinent before treatment. Analysis of a subsample enriched for possible drinking included 136 individuals with an AUD diagnosis plus 43 who did not have AUD, but reported at least one day of heavy drinking prior to the study. However, this subsample reported only 32% of days of any drinking with a median of only 13% of days designated as "heavy." Within this subsample, at baseline, the BUP-NX group reported more mean drinks per drinking day than the XR-NTX group (p = 0.03); however, there were no other significant group differences on drinking observed before, during, or at the end of treatment. There was an overall reduction in drinking during treatment of OUD using both agonist and antagonist medications, so that the hypothesis that XR-NTX would be superior to BUP-NX was not supported. The study is limited by low levels of comorbid AUD or heavy drinking observed in X:BOT trial participants seeking treatment for OUD.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The comparative effectiveness of extended-release naltrexone versus buprenorphine-naloxone for opioid relapse prevention (X:BOT) trial showed that following induction, treatment with the sublingual agonist (buprenorphine-naloxone, BUP-NX) or injected antagonist (extended release naltrexone, XR-NTX) produced similar reductions in opioid relapse in injection users with opioid use disorder (OUD). Because XR-NTX reduces drinking in alcohol use disorder (AUD), we conducted a secondary analysis of the X:BOT sample of patients successfully inducted onto treatment to determine whether XR-NTX (n = 204) was superior to BUP-NX (n = 270) in reducing drinking or heavy drinking in patients with OUD.
METHODS
Standard drink units consumed were measured using the Timeline Follow-back method. Mixed-models regression was used to examine the monthly frequency of any drinking and heavy drinking over 6 months of treatment. We used a proportional hazard survival analysis to examine the time to first drink.
RESULTS
Both treatment groups reduced drinking from baseline to posttreatment (small to medium effect), but no differences between groups were detected. However, only 29% (n = 136) of the sample had AUD and 19% (n = 26/136) of those were abstinent before treatment. Analysis of a subsample enriched for possible drinking included 136 individuals with an AUD diagnosis plus 43 who did not have AUD, but reported at least one day of heavy drinking prior to the study. However, this subsample reported only 32% of days of any drinking with a median of only 13% of days designated as "heavy." Within this subsample, at baseline, the BUP-NX group reported more mean drinks per drinking day than the XR-NTX group (p = 0.03); however, there were no other significant group differences on drinking observed before, during, or at the end of treatment.
CONCLUSIONS
There was an overall reduction in drinking during treatment of OUD using both agonist and antagonist medications, so that the hypothesis that XR-NTX would be superior to BUP-NX was not supported. The study is limited by low levels of comorbid AUD or heavy drinking observed in X:BOT trial participants seeking treatment for OUD.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34698397
doi: 10.1111/acer.14729
pmc: PMC8722377
mid: NIHMS1751029
doi:

Substances chimiques

Buprenorphine, Naloxone Drug Combination 0
Delayed-Action Preparations 0
Narcotic Antagonists 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2569-2578

Subventions

Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : U10 DA013046
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : HHSN271201200017C
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : UG1/U10DA013732
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : U10 DA013714
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : UG1 DA013035
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : UG1/U10DA015831
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : UG1/U10DA013034
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : K24 DA022412
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : U10 DA015833
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : U10 DA013720
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : UG1/U10DA013714
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : U10 DA015831
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : U10 DA013035
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : UG1/U10DA013720
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : UG1/ U10DA013035
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : UG1 DA013714
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : HHSN271201500065C
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : U10 DA013732
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : U10 DA013045
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : U10 DA013034
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

© 2021 by the Research Society on Alcoholism.

Références

Pharmacopsychiatry. 2005 Mar;38(2):100-2
pubmed: 15744636
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2014 Aug;47(2):113-21
pubmed: 24854219
PM R. 2019 Mar 18;:
pubmed: 30884142
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1997 Aug;54(8):737-42
pubmed: 9283509
Lancet. 2018 Jan 27;391(10118):309-318
pubmed: 29150198
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2008 Dec 12;32(8):1867-72
pubmed: 18801404
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Apr 16;(2):CD002207
pubmed: 18425880
Addiction. 2013 Jul;108(7):1188-93
pubmed: 23075415
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 09;(5):CD011117
pubmed: 27157143
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2016 Dec 8;11(1):17
pubmed: 27931253
Subst Use Misuse. 2018 Jan 28;53(2):270-275
pubmed: 28605308
Addiction. 2007 Feb;102(2):257-63
pubmed: 17222280
Am J Psychiatry. 1973 Apr;130(4):483-5
pubmed: 4691309
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2016 Nov;70:50-57
pubmed: 27692188
Am J Addict. 2000 Winter;9(1):38-50
pubmed: 10914292
JAMA. 2006 May 3;295(17):2003-17
pubmed: 16670409
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2018 Jul;42(7):1249-1259
pubmed: 29873089
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2010 Sep;39(2):114-23
pubmed: 20598831
World J Biol Psychiatry. 2017 Mar;18(2):86-119
pubmed: 28006997
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1986;12(1-2):147-64
pubmed: 3788896
Eur Addict Res. 2015;21(2):78-87
pubmed: 25413371
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2020 May;21(7):823-839
pubmed: 32103695
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2006;32(4):503-17
pubmed: 17127538
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2002 Sep;23(2):93-105
pubmed: 12220607
Behav Pharmacol. 2016 Oct;27(7):579-84
pubmed: 27579810
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1989;15(2):191-207
pubmed: 2729226
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1985;11(1-2):37-53
pubmed: 4061434
Addict Behav. 2019 Oct;97:14-19
pubmed: 31112911
Contemp Clin Trials. 2016 Nov;51:34-43
pubmed: 27687743
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1978;5(1):1-22
pubmed: 696703
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1992 Nov;49(11):876-80
pubmed: 1345133
Alcohol Alcohol. 2002 Mar-Apr;37(2):164-8
pubmed: 11912072
Lancet. 2011 Apr 30;377(9776):1506-13
pubmed: 21529928
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2020;46(2):241-250
pubmed: 31860367
Addiction. 2017 Jun;112(6):1036-1044
pubmed: 28061017
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Oct 1;177(10):1480-1488
pubmed: 28846769
Addiction. 2000 Jan;95(1):77-84
pubmed: 10723832
J Subst Abuse. 1988-1989;1(2):161-71
pubmed: 2980867
J Subst Abuse Treat. 1987;4(1):15-9
pubmed: 3302285
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1992 Nov;49(11):881-7
pubmed: 1444726
Br J Addict. 1987 Apr;82(4):381-92
pubmed: 3555574
JAMA. 2005 Apr 6;293(13):1617-25
pubmed: 15811981
Contemp Clin Trials. 2016 Sep;50:253-64
pubmed: 27521809
Ann Intern Med. 1978 Sep;89(3):342-4
pubmed: 686545
Eur Addict Res. 2016;22(4):210-4
pubmed: 27045681
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1978;5(2):191-8
pubmed: 747173
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019 Jan 1;194:438-446
pubmed: 30502545
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006 Feb;63(2):210-8
pubmed: 16461865

Auteurs

John D Roache (JD)

Division of Alcohol & Drug Addiction, Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA.

Martina Pavlicova (M)

Biostatistics Department, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York City, New York, USA.

Aimee Campbell (A)

Division on Substance Use Disorders, Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center and New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York City, New York, USA.

Tse-Hwei Choo (TH)

Mental Health Data Science, Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York City, New York, USA.

Michelle Peavy (M)

Evergreen Treatment Services, Seattle, Washington.

Andrea S Kermack (AS)

Division of Substance Abuse, Departments of Internal Medicine and Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York City, New York, USA.

Edward V Nunes (EV)

Columbia University Irving Medical Center and New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York City, New York, USA.

John Rotrosen (J)

New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York City, New York, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH