Modeling the population-level impact of opioid agonist treatment on mortality among people accessing treatment between 2001 and 2020 in New South Wales, Australia.


Journal

Addiction (Abingdon, England)
ISSN: 1360-0443
Titre abrégé: Addiction
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9304118

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 2022
Historique:
received: 28 04 2021
accepted: 11 10 2021
pubmed: 4 11 2021
medline: 6 4 2022
entrez: 3 11 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The individual-level effectiveness of opioid agonist treatment (OAT) in reducing mortality is well established, but there is less evidence on population-level benefits. We use modeling informed with linked data from the OAT program in New South Wales (NSW), Australia, to estimate the impact of OAT provision in the community and prisons on mortality and the impact of eliminating excess mortality during OAT initiation/discontinuation. Dynamic modeling. A cohort of 49 359 individuals who ever received OAT in NSW from 2001 to 2018. Receipt of OAT was represented through five stages: (i) first month on OAT, (ii) short (1-9 months) and (iii) longer (9+ months) duration on OAT, (iv) first month following OAT discontinuation and (v) rest of time following OAT discontinuation. Incarceration was represented as four strata: (i) never or not incarcerated in the past year, (ii) currently incarcerated, (iii) released from prison within the past month and (iv) released from prison 1-12 months ago. The model incorporated elevated mortality post-release from prison and OAT impact on reducing mortality and incarceration. Among the cohort, mortality was 0.9 per 100 person-years, OAT coverage and retention remained high (> 50%, 1.74 years/episode). During 2001-20, we estimate that OAT provision reduced overdose and other cause mortality among the cohort by 52.8% [95% credible interval (CrI) = 49.4-56.9%] and 26.6% (95% CrI =22.1-30.5%), respectively. We estimate 1.2 deaths averted and 9.7 life-years gained per 100 person-years on OAT. Prison OAT with post-release OAT-linkage accounted for 12.4% (95% CrI = 11.5-13.5%) of all deaths averted by the OAT program, primarily through preventing deaths in the first month post-release. Preventing elevated mortality during OAT initiation and discontinuation could have averted up to 1.4% (95% CrI =  0.8-2.0%) and 3.0% (95% CrI = 2.1-5.3%) of deaths, respectively. The community and prison opioid agonist treatment program in New South Wales, Australia appears to have substantially reduced population-level overdose and all-cause mortality in the past 20 years, partially due to high retention.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND AIMS
The individual-level effectiveness of opioid agonist treatment (OAT) in reducing mortality is well established, but there is less evidence on population-level benefits. We use modeling informed with linked data from the OAT program in New South Wales (NSW), Australia, to estimate the impact of OAT provision in the community and prisons on mortality and the impact of eliminating excess mortality during OAT initiation/discontinuation.
DESIGN
Dynamic modeling.
SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS
A cohort of 49 359 individuals who ever received OAT in NSW from 2001 to 2018.
MEASUREMENTS
Receipt of OAT was represented through five stages: (i) first month on OAT, (ii) short (1-9 months) and (iii) longer (9+ months) duration on OAT, (iv) first month following OAT discontinuation and (v) rest of time following OAT discontinuation. Incarceration was represented as four strata: (i) never or not incarcerated in the past year, (ii) currently incarcerated, (iii) released from prison within the past month and (iv) released from prison 1-12 months ago. The model incorporated elevated mortality post-release from prison and OAT impact on reducing mortality and incarceration.
FINDINGS
Among the cohort, mortality was 0.9 per 100 person-years, OAT coverage and retention remained high (> 50%, 1.74 years/episode). During 2001-20, we estimate that OAT provision reduced overdose and other cause mortality among the cohort by 52.8% [95% credible interval (CrI) = 49.4-56.9%] and 26.6% (95% CrI =22.1-30.5%), respectively. We estimate 1.2 deaths averted and 9.7 life-years gained per 100 person-years on OAT. Prison OAT with post-release OAT-linkage accounted for 12.4% (95% CrI = 11.5-13.5%) of all deaths averted by the OAT program, primarily through preventing deaths in the first month post-release. Preventing elevated mortality during OAT initiation and discontinuation could have averted up to 1.4% (95% CrI =  0.8-2.0%) and 3.0% (95% CrI = 2.1-5.3%) of deaths, respectively.
CONCLUSION
The community and prison opioid agonist treatment program in New South Wales, Australia appears to have substantially reduced population-level overdose and all-cause mortality in the past 20 years, partially due to high retention.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34729841
doi: 10.1111/add.15736
pmc: PMC9299987
doi:

Substances chimiques

Analgesics, Opioid 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1338-1352

Subventions

Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : DP2 DA049295
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : R01 AI147490
Pays : United States
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/N00616X/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : R01 DA055491
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : P30 AI036214
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : R01 DA044170
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

© 2021 The Authors. Addiction published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society for the Study of Addiction.

Références

BMJ Open. 2018 Aug 5;8(8):e025204
pubmed: 30082370
Addiction. 2021 Dec;116(12):3494-3503
pubmed: 33999485
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Feb 1;219:108466
pubmed: 33421801
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2021 Jul;126:108329
pubmed: 34116820
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2021 Mar 6;16(1):15
pubmed: 33676577
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2019 Apr 15;14(1):17
pubmed: 30982468
Addiction. 2020 Dec;115(12):2243-2254
pubmed: 32289189
JAMA Psychiatry. 2020 May 1;77(5):493-502
pubmed: 31876906
Int J Drug Policy. 2021 Feb;88:102707
pubmed: 32151496
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 18;9:CD012021
pubmed: 28922449
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2020 Jan 15;15(1):2
pubmed: 31941547
BMC Public Health. 2017 Sep 29;17(1):757
pubmed: 28962604
J R Soc Interface. 2009 Feb 6;6(31):187-202
pubmed: 19205079
Addiction. 2011 Dec;106(12):2186-92
pubmed: 21749525
Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Jun;38(6):1286-1290
pubmed: 31959523
JAMA Psychiatry. 2021 Sep 1;78(9):979-993
pubmed: 34076676
Prev Med. 2019 Nov;128:105766
pubmed: 31279770
Addiction. 2018 Aug;113(8):1461-1476
pubmed: 29672985
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2021 Dec;131:108538
pubmed: 34154869
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Feb 1;207:107798
pubmed: 31927163
Addiction. 2022 Feb;117(2):382-391
pubmed: 34184798
BMJ. 2010 Oct 26;341:c5475
pubmed: 20978062
J Addict Med. 2020 Jul/Aug;14(4):e44-e52
pubmed: 31651562
Addiction. 2022 May;117(5):1338-1352
pubmed: 34729841
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2018 Nov;94:41-46
pubmed: 30243416
Am J Psychiatry. 2020 Feb 1;177(2):117-124
pubmed: 31786933
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 24;9(7):e030546
pubmed: 31345984
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 4;10(12):e040556
pubmed: 33277286
Ann Med Interne (Paris). 2001 Apr;152 Suppl 3:IS5-12
pubmed: 11435989
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 21;15(1):e0227968
pubmed: 31961908
AIDS. 2017 May 15;31(8):1181-1190
pubmed: 28323752
Int J Drug Policy. 2021 May;91:102841
pubmed: 32712165
Addiction. 2010 Sep;105(9):1545-54
pubmed: 20579009
PLoS One. 2020 May 14;15(5):e0232086
pubmed: 32407321
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015 Feb 1;147:243-50
pubmed: 25510307
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Aug 1;225:108764
pubmed: 34051547
Am J Addict. 2019 Jul;28(4):262-265
pubmed: 30901127
BMJ. 2017 Apr 26;357:j1550
pubmed: 28446428
Am J Addict. 2021 Jan;30(1):83-87
pubmed: 32572978
J Addict Med. 2015 Sep-Oct;9(5):358-67
pubmed: 26406300
Lancet HIV. 2018 Oct;5(10):e578-e587
pubmed: 30033374
Lancet Glob Health. 2017 Dec;5(12):e1208-e1220
pubmed: 29074410
BMJ. 2021 Aug 4;374:n1929
pubmed: 34348937
Eur J Epidemiol. 2018 Jul;33(7):679-688
pubmed: 29234968
Addiction. 2012 Feb;107(2):372-80
pubmed: 21851442
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009 Nov 1;105(1-2):9-15
pubmed: 19608355
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Apr 5;2(4):e192613
pubmed: 31002325
BMJ Open. 2014 Apr 02;4(4):e004666
pubmed: 24694626
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019 Nov 1;204:107537
pubmed: 31521956
Int J Drug Policy. 2017 Aug;46:7-16
pubmed: 28575724
Addiction. 2014 Aug;109(8):1306-17
pubmed: 24612249
Int J Drug Policy. 2014 Jan;25(1):34-52
pubmed: 23973009
Addiction. 2020 Dec;115(12):2393-2404
pubmed: 32392631
BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 1;11(7):e046371
pubmed: 34210725
Addiction. 2021 Mar;116(3):525-535
pubmed: 32557931
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Aug 7;19(1):553
pubmed: 31391048
Lancet Psychiatry. 2021 Apr;8(4):301-309
pubmed: 33640039
Am J Public Health. 2013 May;103(5):917-22
pubmed: 23488511
J Int AIDS Soc. 2020 Jun;23 Suppl 1:e25493
pubmed: 32562375
Addiction. 2019 Aug;114(8):1346-1353
pubmed: 30614096
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 9;10(9):e036102
pubmed: 32912944
Lancet. 2020 Oct 17;396(10258):1204-1222
pubmed: 33069326
J Addict. 2019 Mar 05;2019:2491063
pubmed: 30956839
BMJ. 2020 Oct 15;371:m3988
pubmed: 33060097
Lancet. 2019 Oct 26;394(10208):1560-1579
pubmed: 31657732
Addiction. 2018 May;113(5):937-945
pubmed: 29154395
Health Justice. 2019 Dec 12;7(1):18
pubmed: 31832790
Addiction. 2020 Aug;115(8):1496-1508
pubmed: 32096908

Auteurs

Antoine Chaillon (A)

Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.

Chrianna Bharat (C)

National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Randwick, NSW, Australia.

Jack Stone (J)

Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Nicola Jones (N)

National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Randwick, NSW, Australia.

Louisa Degenhardt (L)

National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Randwick, NSW, Australia.

Sarah Larney (S)

National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Randwick, NSW, Australia.
Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM) and Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.

Michael Farrell (M)

National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Randwick, NSW, Australia.

Peter Vickerman (P)

Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Matthew Hickman (M)

Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Natasha K Martin (NK)

Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.
Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Annick Bórquez (A)

Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.
National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Randwick, NSW, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH