A short comparative study on modified Duckworth-Lewis methods.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
06
01
2021
accepted:
19
10
2021
entrez:
8
11
2021
pubmed:
9
11
2021
medline:
29
1
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In this paper, the Duckworth-Lewis-Stern (DLS) and Duckworth-Lewis-McHale-Asif (DLMA) methods of revising targets for a team batting in second innings in an interrupted Limited Overs International Cricket (LOI), are examined for fairness. The work discusses four significant points: flexibility, intuition, simplicity, and goodness-of-fit of the two mentioned methods. The research findings have shown that the DLMA method is better in every aspect than the DLS method. Further, the data of 1764 ODI matches played during 2004-2021 to investigate the compatibility of the DLMA for high run-scoring One-Day International matches. The results show that DLMA is compatible to the situation of the well-above run-scoring situation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34748588
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259423
pii: PONE-D-21-00464
pmc: PMC8575263
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0259423Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
J Sports Sci Med. 2006 Dec 15;5(4):480-7
pubmed: 24357940