A Qualitative Analysis of the Remote Food Photography Method and the Automated Self-Administered 24-hour Dietary Assessment Tool for Assessing Children's Food Intake Reported by Parent Proxy.
Dietary assessment
Dietary recall
Parent
Participant burden
Qualitative research
Journal
Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
ISSN: 2212-2672
Titre abrégé: J Acad Nutr Diet
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101573920
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2022
05 2022
Historique:
received:
26
04
2021
revised:
31
10
2021
accepted:
01
11
2021
pubmed:
13
11
2021
medline:
27
4
2022
entrez:
12
11
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Accuracy and participant burden are two key considerations in the selection of a dietary assessment tool for assessing children's full-day dietary intake. The aim of this study was to identify barriers experienced by parents and burden when using two technology-based measures of dietary intake to report their child's intake: the Remote Food Photography Method (RFPM) and the Automated Self-Administered 24-hour Dietary Assessment Tool (ASA24). Qualitative, semistructured, focus groups were conducted with parents who served as proxy reporters of their child's dietary intake using the two different dietary assessment methods (ie, RFPM and ASA24) 1 week apart. This study was conducted in 2019 and included 32 parents of children aged 7 to 8 years in Colorado and Louisiana. Barriers adhering to the protocol and burden with the RFPM and ASA24. Qualitative content analysis and Atlas.ti software were used to analyze and interpret focus group data. For the RFPM, parents described missing photos due to unobserved intake, forgetting to capture images, disruption of mealtimes, and child embarrassment when meals were photographed at school. For the ASA24, parents described the time commitment as the main source of burden and the need to expand the food database to include additional ethnic foods and restaurant items. The main strengths were ease of use for the RFPM and the consolidated workload for the ASA24. The barriers experienced by parents and burden differed by method, highlighting the importance of considering the unique characteristics of each assessment tool when designing a pediatric dietary assessment study and interpreting findings.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Accuracy and participant burden are two key considerations in the selection of a dietary assessment tool for assessing children's full-day dietary intake.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to identify barriers experienced by parents and burden when using two technology-based measures of dietary intake to report their child's intake: the Remote Food Photography Method (RFPM) and the Automated Self-Administered 24-hour Dietary Assessment Tool (ASA24).
DESIGN
Qualitative, semistructured, focus groups were conducted with parents who served as proxy reporters of their child's dietary intake using the two different dietary assessment methods (ie, RFPM and ASA24) 1 week apart.
PARTICIPANTS/SETTING
This study was conducted in 2019 and included 32 parents of children aged 7 to 8 years in Colorado and Louisiana.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
Barriers adhering to the protocol and burden with the RFPM and ASA24.
QUALITATIVE ANALYSES
Qualitative content analysis and Atlas.ti software were used to analyze and interpret focus group data.
RESULTS
For the RFPM, parents described missing photos due to unobserved intake, forgetting to capture images, disruption of mealtimes, and child embarrassment when meals were photographed at school. For the ASA24, parents described the time commitment as the main source of burden and the need to expand the food database to include additional ethnic foods and restaurant items. The main strengths were ease of use for the RFPM and the consolidated workload for the ASA24.
CONCLUSIONS
The barriers experienced by parents and burden differed by method, highlighting the importance of considering the unique characteristics of each assessment tool when designing a pediatric dietary assessment study and interpreting findings.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34767972
pii: S2212-2672(21)01440-4
doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2021.11.001
pmc: PMC9038614
mid: NIHMS1756240
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
961-973Subventions
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : U24 OD023382
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : U2C OD023375
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R01 GM121081
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : P30 DK072476
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : U24 OD023319
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : UG1 OD024959
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : U54 GM104940
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : UH3 OD023248
Pays : United States
Investigateurs
P B Smith
(PB)
K L Newby
(KL)
D K Benjamin
(DK)
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Références
Clin Pract Pediatr Psychol. 2018 Sep;6(3):270-277
pubmed: 30420940
Psychol Health. 2010 Dec;25(10):1229-45
pubmed: 20204937
Eat Weight Disord. 2004 Mar;9(1):24-8
pubmed: 15185830
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2020 Dec;7(6):1090-1099
pubmed: 32144631
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017 May;117(5):715-724
pubmed: 28017317
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2014 Oct;9(4):46-9
pubmed: 26125079
Pediatr Obes. 2019 Nov;14(11):e12558
pubmed: 31347302
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2012 Apr;20(4):891-9
pubmed: 22134199
Proc Nutr Soc. 2017 Aug;76(3):283-294
pubmed: 27938425
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2001 Nov;281(5):E891-9
pubmed: 11595643
Br J Nutr. 2022 Apr 28;127(8):1269-1278
pubmed: 34085613
J Nutr. 2019 Jun 1;149(6):1019-1026
pubmed: 31006813
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2012 Nov-Dec;44(6):618-23
pubmed: 22727939
Curr Opin Pediatr. 2018 Apr;30(2):260-262
pubmed: 29356702
Am J Epidemiol. 2015 Jun 15;181(12):970-8
pubmed: 25964261
Nutrients. 2017 Jan 31;9(2):
pubmed: 28146125
Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88
pubmed: 16204405
Pediatr Obes. 2018 Apr;13(4):247-255
pubmed: 28508580
Am J Clin Nutr. 2014 Jul;100(1):233-40
pubmed: 24787491
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2016 Jul;116(7):1172-7
pubmed: 26947889
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009;2009:6869-72
pubmed: 19964186
Int J Obes (Lond). 2016 Jul;40(7):1103-8
pubmed: 27102053
Nutr Res. 2018 Mar;51:1-11
pubmed: 29673539
Appetite. 2011 Aug;57(1):220-8
pubmed: 21600253
J Nutr. 2015 Dec;145(12):2639-45
pubmed: 26468491
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015 Dec;115(12):1986-95
pubmed: 26422452
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2016 Dec;116(12):1932-1941
pubmed: 27720409
Nutrients. 2017 Mar 13;9(3):
pubmed: 28335382
J Nutr. 2003 Feb;133(2):609S-23S
pubmed: 12566511
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 26;18(1):151
pubmed: 30477443
Child Obes. 2012 Dec;8(6):561-71
pubmed: 23181922
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017 Nov;117(11):1731-1737.e11
pubmed: 28807637
Public Health Nutr. 2013 Dec;16(12):2169-77
pubmed: 23701867
Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57
pubmed: 17872937
Int J Pediatr Obes. 2011 Feb;6(1):2-11
pubmed: 20874449
J Am Diet Assoc. 2003 Sep;103(9):1139-45
pubmed: 12963941
Int J Epidemiol. 1995 Apr;24(2):389-98
pubmed: 7635601
JAMA. 2016 Feb 2;315(5):457-8
pubmed: 26746707
Nutr Diet. 2018 Jul;75(3):291-306
pubmed: 29446218
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003 Mar;57(3):218-25
pubmed: 12594199
Br J Nutr. 2013 Apr 14;109(7):1257-65
pubmed: 22863030
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2019 May;51(5):547-555.e1
pubmed: 30826162
Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2014 Oct;16(10):443
pubmed: 25092579
Metabolism. 1995 Feb;44(2 Suppl 2):18-22
pubmed: 7869932
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2009 Oct;63(10):1192-9
pubmed: 19603055
Br J Nutr. 2009 Feb;101(3):446-56
pubmed: 18616837
Qual Health Res. 2019 Jul;29(9):1345-1357
pubmed: 30499371
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2017 Sep;25(9):1633-1638
pubmed: 28758370
Qual Health Res. 2016 Nov;26(13):1753-1760
pubmed: 26613970
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012 Aug;112(8):1134-7
pubmed: 22704899
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Mar-Apr;29(3):398-404
pubmed: 20194979
Int J Obes (Lond). 2015 Jul;39(7):1109-13
pubmed: 25394308
J Nutr. 2010 Sep;140(9):1653-60
pubmed: 20668251