Leaf Apoplast of Field-Grown Potato Analyzed by Quantitative Proteomics and Activity-Based Protein Profiling.
ABPP
apoplast
field-omics
potato
proteomics
serine hydrolases
β-glycosidases
Journal
International journal of molecular sciences
ISSN: 1422-0067
Titre abrégé: Int J Mol Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101092791
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 Nov 2021
06 Nov 2021
Historique:
received:
30
09
2021
revised:
01
11
2021
accepted:
02
11
2021
entrez:
13
11
2021
pubmed:
14
11
2021
medline:
7
1
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Multiple biotic and abiotic stresses challenge plants growing in agricultural fields. Most molecular studies have aimed to understand plant responses to challenges under controlled conditions. However, studies on field-grown plants are scarce, limiting application of the findings in agricultural conditions. In this study, we investigated the composition of apoplastic proteomes of potato cultivar Bintje grown under field conditions, i.e., two field sites in June-August across two years and fungicide treated and untreated, using quantitative proteomics, as well as its activity using activity-based protein profiling (ABPP). Samples were clustered and some proteins showed significant intensity and activity differences, based on their field site and sampling time (June-August), indicating differential regulation of certain proteins in response to environmental or developmental factors. Peroxidases, class II chitinases, pectinesterases, and osmotins were among the proteins more abundant later in the growing season (July-August) as compared to early in the season (June). We did not detect significant differences between fungicide Shirlan treated and untreated field samples in two growing seasons. Using ABPP, we showed differential activity of serine hydrolases and β-glycosidases under greenhouse and field conditions and across a growing season. Furthermore, the activity of serine hydrolases and β-glycosidases, including proteins related to biotic stress tolerance, decreased as the season progressed. The generated proteomics data would facilitate further studies aiming at understanding mechanisms of molecular plant physiology in agricultural fields and help applying effective strategies to mitigate biotic and abiotic stresses.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34769464
pii: ijms222112033
doi: 10.3390/ijms222112033
pmc: PMC8584485
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Plant Proteins
0
Proteome
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : SLF
ID : R-19-25-282
Organisme : Formas
ID : 2020-01211
Organisme : ERC starting grant
ID : M.K.; grant No. 258413
Organisme : ERC Consolidator grant
ID : D.S. and RvdH, grant No. 616449
Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
ID : M.K.; grant No. INST 20876/127-1 FUGG
Références
New Phytol. 2016 Dec;212(4):805-813
pubmed: 27523582
J Biomed Biotechnol. 2010;2010:840518
pubmed: 19911078
BMC Plant Biol. 2012 Jan 11;12:6
pubmed: 22236032
New Phytol. 2014 Aug;203(3):913-25
pubmed: 24890496
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Dec 20;108(51):20832-7
pubmed: 22143776
J Proteome Res. 2016 Feb 5;15(2):638-46
pubmed: 26704985
J Proteome Res. 2015 Feb 6;14(2):1299-307
pubmed: 25411686
Plant Commun. 2020 Jun 12;1(4):100085
pubmed: 33367249
Front Plant Sci. 2014 Jun 03;5:249
pubmed: 24917874
Plant Signal Behav. 2012 Mar;7(3):400-8
pubmed: 22476463
Front Plant Sci. 2015 Aug 03;6:584
pubmed: 26284100
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2011 Jan;10(1):R110.000133
pubmed: 20716697
New Phytol. 2016 Dec;212(4):838-855
pubmed: 27783423
PLoS One. 2015 May 26;10(5):e0128041
pubmed: 26010543
Plant J. 2009 Apr;58(2):235-45
pubmed: 19077166
J Proteome Res. 2009 Jun;8(6):3037-43
pubmed: 19354269
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Jun 20;7:820
pubmed: 27379119
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2009 May;8(5):1082-93
pubmed: 19136719
Front Plant Sci. 2015 Sep 17;6:718
pubmed: 26442032
J Proteome Res. 2016 Jul 1;15(7):2143-51
pubmed: 27224449
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2013 May;12(5):1407-20
pubmed: 23306530
Front Plant Sci. 2011 Nov 28;2:89
pubmed: 22639616
Nat Methods. 2011 Sep 29;8(10):785-6
pubmed: 21959131
Plant Mol Biol. 2012 Mar;78(4-5):503-14
pubmed: 22258187
Nature. 2003 Mar 13;422(6928):193-7
pubmed: 12634792
Plant J. 2004 Mar;37(6):914-39
pubmed: 14996223
Funct Plant Biol. 2016 Aug;43(8):766-782
pubmed: 32480502
J Proteome Res. 2011 Jul 1;10(7):2979-91
pubmed: 21563841
Front Plant Sci. 2014 Jun 20;5:286
pubmed: 24999347
Nat Biotechnol. 2008 Dec;26(12):1367-72
pubmed: 19029910
J Proteome Res. 2011 Apr 1;10(4):1794-805
pubmed: 21254760
J Proteome Res. 2014 Apr 4;13(4):1848-59
pubmed: 24588563
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2005 Dec;4(12):2010-21
pubmed: 16249172
Front Plant Sci. 2013 Feb 01;4:9
pubmed: 23378846
BMC Plant Biol. 2014 Oct 01;14:254
pubmed: 25270759
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2014 Oct;13(10):2787-800
pubmed: 25056938
Nucleic Acids Res. 2014 Jan;42(Database issue):D1167-75
pubmed: 24194592
Bioorg Med Chem. 2012 Jan 15;20(2):597-600
pubmed: 21764588
J Proteome Res. 2015 May 1;14(5):1993-2001
pubmed: 25855118
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2014 Sep;13(9):2513-26
pubmed: 24942700
Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 Jan 4;44(D1):D279-85
pubmed: 26673716
BMC Bioinformatics. 2006 Apr 05;7:191
pubmed: 16597342
BMC Genomics. 2014 Jun 19;15:497
pubmed: 24947944
BMC Genomics. 2014 Apr 28;15:315
pubmed: 24773703
J Proteome Res. 2014 Jun 6;13(6):3114-20
pubmed: 24766612
Agric Syst. 2017 Jul;155:240-254
pubmed: 28701816
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 9;13(11):e0207253
pubmed: 30412603
Nat Methods. 2016 Sep;13(9):731-40
pubmed: 27348712
Genome Biol. 2013 Jun 07;14(6):r54
pubmed: 23759170
Plant Methods. 2019 Nov 18;15:135
pubmed: 31832077
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2012 Mar;11(3):O111.013698
pubmed: 22159718
Nucleic Acids Res. 2010 Jul;38(Web Server issue):W64-70
pubmed: 20435677
J Proteomics. 2011 Jun 10;74(7):1045-67
pubmed: 21420516