Effectiveness of 3D-printed orthoses for traumatic and chronic hand conditions: A scoping review.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 30 03 2021
accepted: 06 11 2021
entrez: 18 11 2021
pubmed: 19 11 2021
medline: 8 1 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

In the field of orthotics, the use of three-dimensional (3D) technology as an alternative to the conventional production process of orthoses is growing. This scoping review aimed to systematically map and summarize studies assessing the effectiveness of 3D-printed orthoses for traumatic and chronic hand conditions, and to identify knowledge gaps. The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, IEEE, and PEDro were searched for studies of any type of 3D-printed orthoses for traumatic and chronic hand conditions. Any outcome related to the effectiveness of 3D-printed orthoses was considered. Two reviewers selected eligible studies, charted data on study characteristics by impairment type, and critically appraised the studies, except for case reports/series. Seventeen studies were included: four randomized controlled trials, four uncontrolled trials, four case series and five case reports. Only three studies had a sample size >20. Impairments described were forearm fractures (n = 5), spasticity (n = 5), muscle weakness (n = 4), joint contractures (n = 2) and pain (n = 1). Four poor to fair quality studies on forearm fractures supported the effectiveness of 3D-printed orthoses on hand function, functionality, and satisfaction. One good quality study on spasticity demonstrated the effectiveness of 3D-printed orthoses on hand function. One poor quality pain study reported limited positive effects on satisfaction. Studies on muscle weakness and joint contractures showed no benefits. Current literature addressing the effectiveness of 3D-printed orthoses for traumatic and chronic hand conditions consists primarily of small and poor methodological quality studies. There is a need for well-designed controlled trials including patient-related outcomes, production time and cost analyses.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
In the field of orthotics, the use of three-dimensional (3D) technology as an alternative to the conventional production process of orthoses is growing.
PURPOSE
This scoping review aimed to systematically map and summarize studies assessing the effectiveness of 3D-printed orthoses for traumatic and chronic hand conditions, and to identify knowledge gaps.
METHODS
The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, IEEE, and PEDro were searched for studies of any type of 3D-printed orthoses for traumatic and chronic hand conditions. Any outcome related to the effectiveness of 3D-printed orthoses was considered. Two reviewers selected eligible studies, charted data on study characteristics by impairment type, and critically appraised the studies, except for case reports/series.
RESULTS
Seventeen studies were included: four randomized controlled trials, four uncontrolled trials, four case series and five case reports. Only three studies had a sample size >20. Impairments described were forearm fractures (n = 5), spasticity (n = 5), muscle weakness (n = 4), joint contractures (n = 2) and pain (n = 1). Four poor to fair quality studies on forearm fractures supported the effectiveness of 3D-printed orthoses on hand function, functionality, and satisfaction. One good quality study on spasticity demonstrated the effectiveness of 3D-printed orthoses on hand function. One poor quality pain study reported limited positive effects on satisfaction. Studies on muscle weakness and joint contractures showed no benefits.
CONCLUSION
Current literature addressing the effectiveness of 3D-printed orthoses for traumatic and chronic hand conditions consists primarily of small and poor methodological quality studies. There is a need for well-designed controlled trials including patient-related outcomes, production time and cost analyses.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34793566
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260271
pii: PONE-D-21-10493
pmc: PMC8601455
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0260271

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

Biomed Res Int. 2020 Jul 25;2020:9569530
pubmed: 32775455
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020 Jan 1;28(1):e20-e27
pubmed: 31290757
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013 May;21(5):668-75
pubmed: 23458785
Biomed Eng Online. 2018 Jun 26;17(1):92
pubmed: 29941033
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2019 Jun 25;32(6):513-518
pubmed: 31277533
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019 Jul;14(5):526-531
pubmed: 30318956
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2016 Apr;40(2):158-69
pubmed: 25428901
Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2005;39(6):360-9
pubmed: 16298809
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 22;13(2):e0193106
pubmed: 29470557
Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 5;5(1):210
pubmed: 27919275
Ann Rehabil Med. 2018 Aug;42(4):634-638
pubmed: 30180536
Clin Rehabil. 2020 Feb;34(2):194-204
pubmed: 31686529
J Rehabil Med. 2012 Mar;44(3):249-53
pubmed: 22366728
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2019 Jun;27(6):1246-1252
pubmed: 31071047
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Feb;96(2):366-375.e6
pubmed: 25449193
NeuroRehabilitation. 2013;33(2):225-31
pubmed: 23949058
3D Print Med. 2017;3(1):11
pubmed: 29782603
Arthritis Rheum. 2004 Oct 15;51(5):792-9
pubmed: 15478158
Open Orthop J. 2017 Apr 17;11:291-296
pubmed: 28567158
3D Print Med. 2020 Aug 18;6(1):22
pubmed: 32809083
CMAJ. 2016 Apr 19;188(7):E120-E129
pubmed: 26903359
Hand (N Y). 2020 May;15(3):388-392
pubmed: 30146902
Materials (Basel). 2020 Jan 09;13(2):
pubmed: 31936429
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2018 Jan;25(1):13-19
pubmed: 29025365
J Pediatr Orthop B. 2019 May;28(3):248-255
pubmed: 30768580
Ann Rheum Dis. 2011 Jun;70(6):921-8
pubmed: 21398333
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2018 Dec;42(6):636-643
pubmed: 30009672
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2017 Jul;2017:3789-3792
pubmed: 29060723
Appl Bionics Biomech. 2017;2017:9610468
pubmed: 28827977
Neurology. 2008 Oct 14;71(16):1254-60
pubmed: 18852440
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473
pubmed: 30178033
J Hand Surg Am. 2006 Oct;31(8):1355-61
pubmed: 17027799
J Orthop Traumatol. 2017 Sep;18(3):229-234
pubmed: 28155059
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2019 Jul;2019:1476-1479
pubmed: 31946172
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2011 Sep;36(7):590-8
pubmed: 21593072
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Apr;99(16):e19791
pubmed: 32311991
J Foot Ankle Res. 2019 Feb 7;12:11
pubmed: 30774718
Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(23):1955-62
pubmed: 19479509

Auteurs

T A M Oud (TAM)

Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

E Lazzari (E)

Laboratory of Clinical Integrative Physiology, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.

H J H Gijsbers (HJH)

Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

M Gobbo (M)

Laboratory of Clinical Integrative Physiology, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.

F Nollet (F)

Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

M A Brehm (MA)

Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH