Identification of quantitative trait nucleotides and candidate genes for tuber yield and mosaic virus tolerance in an elite population of white guinea yam (Dioscorea rotundata) using genome-wide association scan.


Journal

BMC plant biology
ISSN: 1471-2229
Titre abrégé: BMC Plant Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967807

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
22 Nov 2021
Historique:
received: 11 06 2021
accepted: 02 11 2021
entrez: 23 11 2021
pubmed: 24 11 2021
medline: 15 12 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Improvement of tuber yield and tolerance to viruses are priority objectives in white Guinea yam breeding programs. However, phenotypic selection for these traits is quite challenging due to phenotypic plasticity and cumbersome screening of phenotypic-induced variations. This study assessed quantitative trait nucleotides (QTNs) and the underlying candidate genes related to tuber yield per plant (TYP) and yam mosaic virus (YMV) tolerance in a panel of 406 white Guinea yam (Dioscorea rotundata) breeding lines using a genome-wide association study (GWAS). Population structure analysis using 5,581 SNPs differentiated the 406 genotypes into seven distinct sub-groups based delta K. Marker-trait association (MTA) analysis using the multi-locus linear model (mrMLM) identified seventeen QTN regions significant for TYP and five for YMV with various effects. The seveteen QTNs were detected on nine chromosomes, while the five QTNs were identified on five chromosomes. We identified variants responsible for predicting higher yield and low virus severity scores in the breeding panel through the marker-effect prediction. Gene annotation for the significant SNP loci identified several essential putative genes associated with the growth and development of tuber yield and those that code for tolerance to mosaic virus. Application of different multi-locus models of GWAS identified 22 QTNs. Our results provide valuable insight for marker validation and deployment for tuber yield and mosaic virus tolerance in white yam breeding. The information on SNP variants and genes from the present study would fast-track the application of genomics-informed selection decisions in breeding white Guinea yam for rapid introgression of the targeted traits through markers validation.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Improvement of tuber yield and tolerance to viruses are priority objectives in white Guinea yam breeding programs. However, phenotypic selection for these traits is quite challenging due to phenotypic plasticity and cumbersome screening of phenotypic-induced variations. This study assessed quantitative trait nucleotides (QTNs) and the underlying candidate genes related to tuber yield per plant (TYP) and yam mosaic virus (YMV) tolerance in a panel of 406 white Guinea yam (Dioscorea rotundata) breeding lines using a genome-wide association study (GWAS).
RESULTS RESULTS
Population structure analysis using 5,581 SNPs differentiated the 406 genotypes into seven distinct sub-groups based delta K. Marker-trait association (MTA) analysis using the multi-locus linear model (mrMLM) identified seventeen QTN regions significant for TYP and five for YMV with various effects. The seveteen QTNs were detected on nine chromosomes, while the five QTNs were identified on five chromosomes. We identified variants responsible for predicting higher yield and low virus severity scores in the breeding panel through the marker-effect prediction. Gene annotation for the significant SNP loci identified several essential putative genes associated with the growth and development of tuber yield and those that code for tolerance to mosaic virus.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Application of different multi-locus models of GWAS identified 22 QTNs. Our results provide valuable insight for marker validation and deployment for tuber yield and mosaic virus tolerance in white yam breeding. The information on SNP variants and genes from the present study would fast-track the application of genomics-informed selection decisions in breeding white Guinea yam for rapid introgression of the targeted traits through markers validation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34809560
doi: 10.1186/s12870-021-03314-w
pii: 10.1186/s12870-021-03314-w
pmc: PMC8607609
doi:

Substances chimiques

Genetic Markers 0

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

552

Informations de copyright

© 2021. The Author(s).

Références

Theor Appl Genet. 2016 Oct;129(10):1843-60
pubmed: 27306516
Nat Genet. 2014 Feb;46(2):100-6
pubmed: 24473328
Theor Appl Genet. 2013 Apr;126(4):1039-52
pubmed: 23299900
Heredity (Edinb). 2018 Mar;120(3):208-218
pubmed: 29234158
BMC Genet. 2018 Apr 10;19(1):23
pubmed: 29636022
G3 (Bethesda). 2018 May 31;8(6):1909-1919
pubmed: 29661842
Curr Genomics. 2016 Aug;17(4):358-67
pubmed: 27499684
Heredity (Edinb). 2017 Jun;118(6):517-524
pubmed: 28295030
BMC Plant Biol. 2020 Sep 1;20(1):404
pubmed: 32873245
Mol Ecol. 2005 Jul;14(8):2611-20
pubmed: 15969739
Sci Rep. 2020 Aug 6;10(1):13191
pubmed: 32764649
Plant Cell. 1992 Oct;4(10):1321-31
pubmed: 1446172
PLoS Comput Biol. 2017 Jan 31;13(1):e1005357
pubmed: 28141824
J Exp Bot. 2012 Feb;63(3):1095-106
pubmed: 22143917
Physiol Rev. 2006 Jan;86(1):155-203
pubmed: 16371597
Plant Mol Biol. 2011 Mar;75(4-5):321-31
pubmed: 21246258
Sci Rep. 2016 Jan 20;6:19444
pubmed: 26787347
Nat Immunol. 2006 Dec;7(12):1243-9
pubmed: 17110940
Theor Appl Genet. 2014 Mar;127(3):731-48
pubmed: 24408376
Bioinformatics. 2019 Feb 1;35(3):526-528
pubmed: 30016406
Plant Biotechnol J. 2017 Aug;15(8):953-969
pubmed: 28055148
Plants (Basel). 2020 Jul 31;9(8):
pubmed: 32751829
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Apr 19;9:503
pubmed: 29725343
Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 Jul 2;47(W1):W636-W641
pubmed: 30976793
Brief Bioinform. 2018 Jul 20;19(4):700-712
pubmed: 28158525
Theor Appl Genet. 2002 Oct;105(5):716-725
pubmed: 12582485
Am J Hum Genet. 2007 Sep;81(3):559-75
pubmed: 17701901
Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Nov 15;25(22):4692-3
pubmed: 9358185
Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Jan 16;19(1):
pubmed: 29337875
Nat Methods. 2015 Apr;12(4):357-60
pubmed: 25751142
Theor Appl Genet. 2019 Jun;132(6):1733-1744
pubmed: 30783744
Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2020 Aug;18(4):481-487
pubmed: 33346083
Genetics. 2000 Jun;155(2):945-59
pubmed: 10835412
Allergol Int. 2020 Jan;69(1):11-18
pubmed: 31784246
Mol Ecol Notes. 2007 Jul 1;7(4):574-578
pubmed: 18784791
FEBS Lett. 1994 Jun 6;346(1):48-54
pubmed: 8206158
Plant Physiol. 2002 Mar;128(3):951-61
pubmed: 11891250
J Exp Bot. 2008;59(6):1383-97
pubmed: 18390848
Nucleic Acids Res. 2012 Jan;40(Database issue):D306-12
pubmed: 22096229
Genetics. 2003 Aug;164(4):1567-87
pubmed: 12930761

Auteurs

Paterne A Agre (PA)

International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, PMB 5320, Oyo Road, Ibadan, Oyo State, 200001, Nigeria. p.agre@cgiar.org.

Prince E Norman (PE)

Sierra Leone Agricultural Research Institute, PMB 1313, Tower Hill, Freetown, Sierra Leone.

Robert Asiedu (R)

International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, PMB 5320, Oyo Road, Ibadan, Oyo State, 200001, Nigeria.

Asrat Asfaw (A)

International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, PMB 5320, Oyo Road, Ibadan, Oyo State, 200001, Nigeria.

Articles similaires

Genome, Chloroplast Phylogeny Genetic Markers Base Composition High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
Humans Macular Degeneration Mendelian Randomization Analysis Life Style Genome-Wide Association Study
Capsicum Disease Resistance Plant Diseases Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide Ralstonia solanacearum
Animals Natural Killer T-Cells Mice Adipose Tissue Lipid Metabolism

Classifications MeSH