Comparing Video-Based, Telehealth-Delivered Exercise and Weight Loss Programs With Online Education on Outcomes of Knee Osteoarthritis : A Randomized Trial.


Journal

Annals of internal medicine
ISSN: 1539-3704
Titre abrégé: Ann Intern Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0372351

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2022
Historique:
pubmed: 30 11 2021
medline: 15 4 2022
entrez: 29 11 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Scalable knee osteoarthritis programs are needed to deliver recommended education, exercise, and weight loss interventions. To evaluate two 6-month, telehealth-delivered exercise programs, 1 with and 1 without dietary intervention. 3-group, parallel randomized (5:5:2) trial. (Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12618000930280). Australian private health insurance members. 415 persons with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis and a body mass index between 28 and 40 kg/m All groups received access to electronic osteoarthritis information (control). The exercise program comprised 6 physiotherapist consultations via videoconference for exercise, self-management advice, and behavioral counseling, plus exercise equipment and resources. The diet and exercise program included an additional 6 dietitian consultations for a ketogenic very-low-calorie diet (2 formulated meal replacements and a low-carbohydrate meal daily) followed by a transition to healthy eating, as well as nutrition and behavioral resources. Primary outcomes were changes in knee pain (numerical rating scale [NRS] of 0 to 10, higher indicating worse) and physical function (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index [WOMAC]; scale, 0 to 68, higher indicating worse) at 6 months (primary time point) and 12 months. Secondary outcomes were weight, physical activity, quality of life, mental health, global change, satisfaction, willingness to have surgery, orthopedic appointments, and knee surgery. A total of 379 participants (91%) provided 6-month primary outcomes, and 372 (90%) provided 12-month primary outcomes. At 6 months, both programs were superior to control for pain (between-group mean difference in change on NRS: diet and exercise, -1.5 [95% CI, -2.1 to -0.8]; exercise, -0.8 [CI, -1.5 to -0.2]) and function (between-group mean difference in change on WOMAC: diet and exercise, -9.8 [CI, -12.5 to -7.0]; exercise, -7.0 [CI, -9.7 to -4.2]). The diet and exercise program was superior to exercise (pain, -0.6 [CI, -1.1 to -0.2]; function, -2.8 [CI, -4.7 to -0.8]). Findings were similar at 12 months. Participants and clinicians were unblinded. Telehealth-delivered exercise and diet programs improved pain and function in people with knee osteoarthritis and overweight or obesity. A dietary intervention conferred modest additional pain and function benefits over exercise. Medibank, the Medibank Better Health Foundation Research Fund, and a National Health and Medical Research Council Centre of Research Excellence.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Scalable knee osteoarthritis programs are needed to deliver recommended education, exercise, and weight loss interventions.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
To evaluate two 6-month, telehealth-delivered exercise programs, 1 with and 1 without dietary intervention.
DESIGN METHODS
3-group, parallel randomized (5:5:2) trial. (Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12618000930280).
SETTING METHODS
Australian private health insurance members.
PARTICIPANTS METHODS
415 persons with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis and a body mass index between 28 and 40 kg/m
INTERVENTION METHODS
All groups received access to electronic osteoarthritis information (control). The exercise program comprised 6 physiotherapist consultations via videoconference for exercise, self-management advice, and behavioral counseling, plus exercise equipment and resources. The diet and exercise program included an additional 6 dietitian consultations for a ketogenic very-low-calorie diet (2 formulated meal replacements and a low-carbohydrate meal daily) followed by a transition to healthy eating, as well as nutrition and behavioral resources.
MEASUREMENTS METHODS
Primary outcomes were changes in knee pain (numerical rating scale [NRS] of 0 to 10, higher indicating worse) and physical function (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index [WOMAC]; scale, 0 to 68, higher indicating worse) at 6 months (primary time point) and 12 months. Secondary outcomes were weight, physical activity, quality of life, mental health, global change, satisfaction, willingness to have surgery, orthopedic appointments, and knee surgery.
RESULTS RESULTS
A total of 379 participants (91%) provided 6-month primary outcomes, and 372 (90%) provided 12-month primary outcomes. At 6 months, both programs were superior to control for pain (between-group mean difference in change on NRS: diet and exercise, -1.5 [95% CI, -2.1 to -0.8]; exercise, -0.8 [CI, -1.5 to -0.2]) and function (between-group mean difference in change on WOMAC: diet and exercise, -9.8 [CI, -12.5 to -7.0]; exercise, -7.0 [CI, -9.7 to -4.2]). The diet and exercise program was superior to exercise (pain, -0.6 [CI, -1.1 to -0.2]; function, -2.8 [CI, -4.7 to -0.8]). Findings were similar at 12 months.
LIMITATION CONCLUSIONS
Participants and clinicians were unblinded.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Telehealth-delivered exercise and diet programs improved pain and function in people with knee osteoarthritis and overweight or obesity. A dietary intervention conferred modest additional pain and function benefits over exercise.
PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE BACKGROUND
Medibank, the Medibank Better Health Foundation Research Fund, and a National Health and Medical Research Council Centre of Research Excellence.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34843383
doi: 10.7326/M21-2388
doi:

Banques de données

ANZCTR
['ACTRN12618000930280']

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

198-209

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn

Auteurs

Kim L Bennell (KL)

Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (K.L.B., B.J.L., D.M., B.M., A.J.K., T.E., L.S., R.S.H.).

Belinda J Lawford (BJ)

Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (K.L.B., B.J.L., D.M., B.M., A.J.K., T.E., L.S., R.S.H.).

Catherine Keating (C)

Medibank, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (C.K., C.B.).

Courtney Brown (C)

Medibank, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (C.K., C.B.).

Jessica Kasza (J)

Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (J.K.).

Dave Mackenzie (D)

Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (K.L.B., B.J.L., D.M., B.M., A.J.K., T.E., L.S., R.S.H.).

Ben Metcalf (B)

Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (K.L.B., B.J.L., D.M., B.M., A.J.K., T.E., L.S., R.S.H.).

Alexander J Kimp (AJ)

Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (K.L.B., B.J.L., D.M., B.M., A.J.K., T.E., L.S., R.S.H.).

Thorlene Egerton (T)

Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (K.L.B., B.J.L., D.M., B.M., A.J.K., T.E., L.S., R.S.H.).

Libby Spiers (L)

Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (K.L.B., B.J.L., D.M., B.M., A.J.K., T.E., L.S., R.S.H.).

Joseph Proietto (J)

Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (J.P., P.S.).

Priya Sumithran (P)

Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (J.P., P.S.).

Anthony Harris (A)

Centre for Health Economics, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (A.H.).

Jonathan G Quicke (JG)

School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, United Kingdom (J.G.Q.).

Rana S Hinman (RS)

Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (K.L.B., B.J.L., D.M., B.M., A.J.K., T.E., L.S., R.S.H.).

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH