Post-Transplantation Immunosuppression After TCRΑβ/CD19 Graft Depletion Does Not Improve HSCT Outcomes in Primary Immunodeficiency.
Antigens, CD19
Child
Epstein-Barr Virus Infections
/ complications
Graft vs Host Disease
/ prevention & control
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
/ adverse effects
Herpesvirus 4, Human
Humans
Immunologic Deficiency Syndromes
/ drug therapy
Immunosuppressive Agents
/ therapeutic use
Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell, alpha-beta
Transplantation Conditioning
/ adverse effects
Graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis
Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
Post-transplant immunosuppression
Primary immunodeficiency
TCRαβ/cd19 depletion
Journal
Transplantation and cellular therapy
ISSN: 2666-6367
Titre abrégé: Transplant Cell Ther
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101774629
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2022
03 2022
Historique:
received:
05
08
2021
revised:
29
11
2021
accepted:
29
11
2021
pubmed:
8
12
2021
medline:
21
4
2022
entrez:
7
12
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We recently demonstrated that TCRαβ+/CD19+ graft depletion successfully prevents severe acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in pediatric patients with primary immunodeficiencies (PID) receiving transplants from both matched unrelated and mismatched related donors. However, in all patients, short-term post-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) immunosuppressive therapy (IST) was used. There are limited data on TCRαβ+/CD19+ graft depletion with no post-HSCT IST implementation. In the current study 74 PID patients who underwent first HSCT from matched unrelated (n=51) or mismatched related donors (n=23) with TCRαβ+/CD19+ graft depletion were included. All received as a conditioning regimen a combination of treosulfan with fludarabine and either melphalan or thiotepa. In all, thymoglobulin 5 mg/kg (days -5, -4, -3) and rituximab at day -1 were used. In 48 patients, various approaches to short-term post-transplantation IST were used, and 26 patients received no post-HSCT IST. The rates of engraftment, acute and chronic GVHD, survival, and mortality were similar in those who received and did not receive IST, with a slightly higher incidence of graft rejection in patients not receiving IST: 19% in the non-IST group against 13% in the IST group (P = .41). The incidence of cytomegalovirus reactivation was 50% and 39% (P = .50) and Epstein-Barr virus reactivation 10% and 0 (P = .20) in the IST and non-IST groups, respectively. No grade 4 adverse events were seen in both groups, although in 19 of 40 (47.5%) patients receiving calcineurin inhibitors, the therapy was discontinued before day 45. More robust immune recovery with both T- and B-lymphocytes was observed in the non-IST group. To conclude, TCRαβ+/CD19+ in combination with particular serotherapy effectively prevents severe acute and chronic GVHD in PID. Regarding remaining risks of infectious complications and additional drug-related toxicity, there are no benefits to post-HSCT IST use in these patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34875404
pii: S2666-6367(21)01409-3
doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2021.11.022
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antigens, CD19
0
Immunosuppressive Agents
0
Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell, alpha-beta
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
172.e1-172.e4Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.