Functional characterization of hydroxyproline-O-galactosyltransferases for Arabidopsis arabinogalactan-protein synthesis.


Journal

BMC plant biology
ISSN: 1471-2229
Titre abrégé: BMC Plant Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967807

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
13 Dec 2021
Historique:
received: 05 08 2021
accepted: 24 11 2021
entrez: 14 12 2021
pubmed: 15 12 2021
medline: 1 1 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Arabinogalactan-proteins (AGPs) are structurally complex hydroxyproline-rich cell wall glycoproteins ubiquitous in the plant kingdom. AGPs biosynthesis involves a series of post-translational modifications including the addition of type II arabinogalactans to non-contiguous Hyp residues. To date, eight Hyp-galactosyltransferases (Hyp-GALTs; GALT2-GALT9) belonging to CAZy GT31, are known to catalyze the addition of the first galactose residues to AGP protein backbones and enable subsequent AGP glycosylation. The extent of genetic redundancy, however, remains to be elucidated for the Hyp-GALT gene family. To examine their gene redundancy and functions, we generated various multiple gene knock-outs, including a triple mutant (galt5 galt8 galt9), two quadruple mutants (galt2 galt5 galt7 galt8, galt2 galt5 galt7 galt9), and one quintuple mutant (galt2 galt5 galt7 galt8 galt9), and comprehensively examined their biochemical and physiological phenotypes. The key findings include: AGP precipitations with β-Yariv reagent showed that GALT2, GALT5, GALT7, GALT8 and GALT9 act redundantly with respect to AGP glycosylation in cauline and rosette leaves, while the activity of GALT7, GALT8 and GALT9 dominate in the stem, silique and flowers. Monosaccharide composition analysis showed that galactose was decreased in the silique and root AGPs of the Hyp-GALT mutants. TEM analysis of 25789 quintuple mutant stems indicated cell wall defects coincident with the observed developmental and growth impairment in these Hyp-GALT mutants. Correlated with expression patterns, galt2, galt5, galt7, galt8, and galt9 display equal additive effects on insensitivity to β-Yariv-induced growth inhibition, silique length, plant height, and pollen viability. Interestingly, galt7, galt8, and galt9 contributed more to primary root growth and root tip swelling under salt stress, whereas galt2 and galt5 played more important roles in seed morphology, germination defects and seed set. Pollen defects likely contributed to the reduced seed set in these mutants. Additive and pleiotropic effects of GALT2, GALT5, GALT7, GALT8 and GALT9 on vegetative and reproductive growth phenotypes were teased apart via generation of different combinations of Hyp-GALT knock-out mutants. Taken together, the generation of higher order Hyp-GALT mutants demonstrate the functional importance of AG polysaccharides decorating the AGPs with respect to various aspects of plant growth and development.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Arabinogalactan-proteins (AGPs) are structurally complex hydroxyproline-rich cell wall glycoproteins ubiquitous in the plant kingdom. AGPs biosynthesis involves a series of post-translational modifications including the addition of type II arabinogalactans to non-contiguous Hyp residues. To date, eight Hyp-galactosyltransferases (Hyp-GALTs; GALT2-GALT9) belonging to CAZy GT31, are known to catalyze the addition of the first galactose residues to AGP protein backbones and enable subsequent AGP glycosylation. The extent of genetic redundancy, however, remains to be elucidated for the Hyp-GALT gene family.
RESULTS RESULTS
To examine their gene redundancy and functions, we generated various multiple gene knock-outs, including a triple mutant (galt5 galt8 galt9), two quadruple mutants (galt2 galt5 galt7 galt8, galt2 galt5 galt7 galt9), and one quintuple mutant (galt2 galt5 galt7 galt8 galt9), and comprehensively examined their biochemical and physiological phenotypes. The key findings include: AGP precipitations with β-Yariv reagent showed that GALT2, GALT5, GALT7, GALT8 and GALT9 act redundantly with respect to AGP glycosylation in cauline and rosette leaves, while the activity of GALT7, GALT8 and GALT9 dominate in the stem, silique and flowers. Monosaccharide composition analysis showed that galactose was decreased in the silique and root AGPs of the Hyp-GALT mutants. TEM analysis of 25789 quintuple mutant stems indicated cell wall defects coincident with the observed developmental and growth impairment in these Hyp-GALT mutants. Correlated with expression patterns, galt2, galt5, galt7, galt8, and galt9 display equal additive effects on insensitivity to β-Yariv-induced growth inhibition, silique length, plant height, and pollen viability. Interestingly, galt7, galt8, and galt9 contributed more to primary root growth and root tip swelling under salt stress, whereas galt2 and galt5 played more important roles in seed morphology, germination defects and seed set. Pollen defects likely contributed to the reduced seed set in these mutants.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Additive and pleiotropic effects of GALT2, GALT5, GALT7, GALT8 and GALT9 on vegetative and reproductive growth phenotypes were teased apart via generation of different combinations of Hyp-GALT knock-out mutants. Taken together, the generation of higher order Hyp-GALT mutants demonstrate the functional importance of AG polysaccharides decorating the AGPs with respect to various aspects of plant growth and development.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34903166
doi: 10.1186/s12870-021-03362-2
pii: 10.1186/s12870-021-03362-2
pmc: PMC8667403
doi:

Substances chimiques

Arabidopsis Proteins 0
Galactans 0
Glucosides 0
Mucoproteins 0
Plant Proteins 0
Yariv reagent 0
arabinogalactan proteins 0
Phloroglucinol DHD7FFG6YS
Galactosyltransferases EC 2.4.1.-
Hydroxyproline RMB44WO89X
arabinogalactan SL4SX1O487

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

590

Informations de copyright

© 2021. The Author(s).

Références

Int Rev Cytol. 1997;174:195-291
pubmed: 9161008
Science. 1994 Oct 28;266(5185):605-14
pubmed: 17793455
Mol Plant. 2015 May;8(5):734-46
pubmed: 25655826
Plant Physiol. 2003 Dec;133(4):1911-25
pubmed: 14645732
Plant Cell. 2000 Sep;12(9):1751-68
pubmed: 11006345
Plant Physiol. 2017 Jan;173(1):354-363
pubmed: 27913739
Commun Integr Biol. 2016 May 05;9(3):e1177687
pubmed: 27489583
J Exp Bot. 2013 Dec;64(18):5537-51
pubmed: 24127514
Front Plant Sci. 2012 Jun 27;3:140
pubmed: 22754559
Plant J. 2015 Mar;81(5):736-46
pubmed: 25600942
Plant Physiol. 1992 Jun;99(2):538-47
pubmed: 16668920
Phytochemistry. 2004 Mar;65(5):609-15
pubmed: 15003425
Phytochemistry. 2004 May;65(10):1429-38
pubmed: 15231417
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 05;11(1):e0145092
pubmed: 26731606
Planta. 1997;203(3):289-94
pubmed: 9431677
BMC Plant Biol. 2015 Dec 21;15:295
pubmed: 26690932
Plant J. 2013 Oct;76(1):128-37
pubmed: 23837821
Plant Physiol. 2006 Dec;142(4):1469-79
pubmed: 17056757
BMC Plant Biol. 2021 Jan 6;21(1):16
pubmed: 33407116
Plant Physiol. 2010 Jun;153(2):403-19
pubmed: 20388666
Plant Cell. 2013 Jan;25(1):270-87
pubmed: 23371948
Rice (N Y). 2020 Jun 17;13(1):41
pubmed: 32556633
Ann Bot. 2017 Apr 1;119(6):989-1000
pubmed: 28137704
Nat Genet. 2002 Feb;30(2):190-3
pubmed: 11780140
Plant Mol Biol. 2008 Sep;68(1-2):43-59
pubmed: 18548197
Plant Mol Biol. 2001 Sep;47(1-2):161-76
pubmed: 11554470
BMC Plant Biol. 2020 May 18;20(1):221
pubmed: 32423474
Plant Methods. 2013 Feb 05;9(1):4
pubmed: 23379342
J Exp Bot. 2009;60(11):3133-42
pubmed: 19433479
Plant J. 2016 Jan;85(2):193-208
pubmed: 26577059
Plant J. 2007 Oct;52(2):240-51
pubmed: 17672840
Trends Cell Biol. 1996 Nov;6(11):411-4
pubmed: 15157509
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Jun 07;7:803
pubmed: 27375657
Plant Cell. 2007 Jul;19(7):2278-92
pubmed: 17630273
Science. 2011 Jun 17;332(6036):1401-3
pubmed: 21680836
PLoS One. 2015 May 14;10(5):e0125624
pubmed: 25974423
Plant Physiol. 2017 Jan;173(1):183-205
pubmed: 27837085
Plant J. 1996 Jun;9(6):919-25
pubmed: 8696368
Ann Bot. 2012 Aug;110(3):573-84
pubmed: 22652420
Am J Clin Pathol. 1972 Oct;58(4):376-82
pubmed: 4640296
Plant Physiol. 2010 Jun;153(2):485-513
pubmed: 20395450
Plant Cell. 2015 Oct;27(10):2814-28
pubmed: 26410299
J Biol Chem. 2010 Apr 30;285(18):13638-45
pubmed: 20194500
Plant Sci. 2019 Apr;281:9-18
pubmed: 30824065
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Dec 11;11:615392
pubmed: 33362841
J Biol Chem. 1995 Feb 10;270(6):2541-9
pubmed: 7852316
Plant Cell. 2020 Oct;32(10):3346-3369
pubmed: 32769130
BMC Plant Biol. 2013 Jan 08;13:7
pubmed: 23297674
Front Plant Sci. 2021 May 25;12:678564
pubmed: 34113372
New Phytol. 2016 Mar;209(4):1428-41
pubmed: 26667994
New Phytol. 2006;169(3):479-92
pubmed: 16411951
Plant Cell Physiol. 2008 Oct;49(10):1465-77
pubmed: 18779216
Plant J. 2013 Dec;76(6):1016-29
pubmed: 24128328
J Biol Chem. 2004 Mar 26;279(13):13156-65
pubmed: 14724279
Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2007;58:137-61
pubmed: 17201686
Plant J. 2011 Dec;68(6):941-53
pubmed: 21883548
Plant Cell. 2012 Jul;24(7):2898-916
pubmed: 22822206
Plant Physiol. 2000 Jan;122(1):3-10
pubmed: 10631243
Ann Bot. 2012 Jul;110(2):383-404
pubmed: 22786747
Plant J. 2010 May 1;62(4):689-703
pubmed: 20202165
Curr Biol. 2016 Apr 25;26(8):R321-3
pubmed: 27115687
Plant Physiol. 2013 Mar;161(3):1117-26
pubmed: 23296690
J Biol Chem. 2004 Oct 29;279(44):45503-11
pubmed: 15322080
Plant J. 2007 Feb;49(4):629-40
pubmed: 17217456
Front Plant Sci. 2019 Apr 12;10:447
pubmed: 31031785
Plant Physiol. 2007 Nov;145(3):863-74
pubmed: 17885091
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 May 4;107(18):8063-70
pubmed: 20385809
Plant Signal Behav. 2014;9(6):e28891
pubmed: 24739253
Plant J. 2003 Oct;36(2):256-70
pubmed: 14535889
Ann Bot. 2014 Oct;114(6):1069-85
pubmed: 25139429
Mol Plant. 2013 Jul;6(4):1369-72
pubmed: 23396039
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 25;9(3):e93291
pubmed: 24667545
Plant Signal Behav. 2011 Jun;6(6):855-7
pubmed: 21849816
BMC Plant Biol. 2014 Apr 03;14:90
pubmed: 24693939
Am J Bot. 2008 Dec;95(12):1491-7
pubmed: 21628156
New Phytol. 2013 Jan;197(2):668-679
pubmed: 23173941
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Jun 20;8:1092
pubmed: 28676820

Auteurs

Dasmeet Kaur (D)

Molecular and Cellular Biology Program, Ohio University, Athens, OH, 45701-2979, USA.
Department of Environmental & Plant Biology, Ohio University, Athens, OH, 45701-2979, USA.

Michael A Held (MA)

Molecular and Cellular Biology Program, Ohio University, Athens, OH, 45701-2979, USA.
Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry, Ohio University, Athens, OH, 45701-2979, USA.

Mountain R Smith (MR)

Department of Environmental & Plant Biology, Ohio University, Athens, OH, 45701-2979, USA.

Allan M Showalter (AM)

Molecular and Cellular Biology Program, Ohio University, Athens, OH, 45701-2979, USA. showalte@ohio.edu.
Department of Environmental & Plant Biology, Ohio University, Athens, OH, 45701-2979, USA. showalte@ohio.edu.

Articles similaires

T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory Lung Neoplasms Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras) Animals Humans

Pathogenic mitochondrial DNA mutations inhibit melanoma metastasis.

Spencer D Shelton, Sara House, Luiza Martins Nascentes Melo et al.
1.00
DNA, Mitochondrial Humans Melanoma Mutation Neoplasm Metastasis
Amaryllidaceae Alkaloids Lycoris NADPH-Ferrihemoprotein Reductase Gene Expression Regulation, Plant Plant Proteins

Prevalence and implications of fragile X premutation screening in Thailand.

Areerat Hnoonual, Sunita Kaewfai, Chanin Limwongse et al.
1.00
Humans Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein Thailand Male Female

Classifications MeSH