Reduced-Dose Deep Learning Reconstruction for Abdominal CT of Liver Metastases.
Journal
Radiology
ISSN: 1527-1315
Titre abrégé: Radiology
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0401260
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2022
04 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
12
1
2022
medline:
14
5
2022
entrez:
11
1
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Background Assessment of liver lesions is constrained as CT radiation doses are lowered; evidence suggests deep learning reconstructions mitigate such effects. Purpose To evaluate liver metastases and image quality between reduced-dose deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) and standard-dose filtered back projection (FBP) contrast-enhanced abdominal CT. Materials and Methods In this prospective Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant study (September 2019 through April 2021), participants with biopsy-proven colorectal cancer and liver metastases at baseline CT underwent standard-dose and reduced-dose portal venous abdominal CT in the same breath hold. Three radiologists detected and characterized lesions at standard-dose FBP and reduced-dose DLIR, reported confidence, and scored image quality. Contrast-to-noise ratios for liver metastases were recorded. Summary statistics were reported, and a generalized linear mixed model was used. Results Fifty-one participants (mean age ± standard deviation, 57 years ± 13; 31 men) were evaluated. The mean volume CT dose index was 65.1% lower with reduced-dose CT (12.2 mGy) than with standard-dose CT (34.9 mGy). A total of 161 lesions (127 metastases, 34 benign lesions) with a mean size of 0.7 cm ± 0.3 were identified. Subjective image quality of reduced-dose DLIR was superior to that of standard-dose FBP (
Identifiants
pubmed: 35014900
doi: 10.1148/radiol.211838
pmc: PMC8962777
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03151564']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
90-98Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA014236
Pays : United States
Références
Eur Radiol. 2020 Jul;30(7):3951-3959
pubmed: 32100091
AAPM Rep. 2014 Sep;2014:6-23
pubmed: 27546949
Med Phys. 2020 Sep;47(9):3961-3971
pubmed: 32506661
Eur J Radiol. 2021 Aug;141:109808
pubmed: 34120010
Neuroradiology. 2021 Jun;63(6):905-912
pubmed: 33037503
Radiology. 2018 Jul;288(1):285-292
pubmed: 29634436
Radiographics. 2017 Nov-Dec;37(7):2113-2131
pubmed: 29131760
Eur Radiol. 2021 Nov;31(11):8342-8353
pubmed: 33893535
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2019 Jan/Feb;43(1):155-162
pubmed: 30211799
Phys Med. 2020 Aug;76:28-37
pubmed: 32574999
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 Jul;215(1):50-57
pubmed: 32286872
Radiology. 2017 Jul;284(1):120-133
pubmed: 28221093
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2018 Jul;5(3):031403
pubmed: 29250570
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 Jan;212(1):84-93
pubmed: 30299999
Radiol Artif Intell. 2019 Oct 09;1(6):e180011
pubmed: 33937803
Eur Radiol. 2021 Aug;31(8):5533-5543
pubmed: 33555354
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 Jun;216(6):1668-1677
pubmed: 33852337
Ann Surg. 2002 Jun;235(6):759-66
pubmed: 12035031
Radiology. 2021 Jan;298(1):180-188
pubmed: 33201790
Ann Surg. 2004 Jun;239(6):818-25; discussion 825-7
pubmed: 15166961
Radiographics. 2021 Sep-Oct;41(5):1493-1508
pubmed: 34469209
Eur J Radiol. 2021 Aug;141:109825
pubmed: 34144309
Acad Radiol. 2020 Jun;27(6):847-855
pubmed: 31447259
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2020 Sep - Oct;14(5):444-451
pubmed: 31974008
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012 Jun;33(6):1020-6
pubmed: 22322608
Radiology. 2019 Feb;290(2):400-409
pubmed: 30480489
Radiology. 2011 Oct;261(1):193-8
pubmed: 21771956
Eur Radiol. 2017 May;27(5):2055-2066
pubmed: 27595834
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2018 Mar/Apr;42(2):184-190
pubmed: 28806318
Radiology. 2017 Sep;284(3):777-787
pubmed: 28170300