Adapting for sustainability: Ensuring provision of research skills development for undergraduate medical students.
Journal
The clinical teacher
ISSN: 1743-498X
Titre abrégé: Clin Teach
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101227511
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2022
04 2022
Historique:
revised:
07
12
2021
received:
19
05
2021
accepted:
20
12
2021
pubmed:
14
1
2022
medline:
29
3
2022
entrez:
13
1
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The Covid-19 pandemic forced undergraduate medical students and staff to adapt and adjust to new strategies for conducting research. The aim of this study was to investigate its impact on student research opportunities across Irish and UK medical schools and how these programmes have responded, both in terms of innovation and practical solutions. A 17-item online mixed methods survey was distributed to academic staff across 31 Irish and UK medical schools. Participants were asked about (a) the effect of the pandemic on undergraduate research teaching and project opportunities, (b) measures taken to mitigate pandemic effects on these curricular elements. Descriptive analysis was used to summarise quantitative data, and free-text responses were thematically grouped. We received a 66.74% (n = 21) response rate to our survey. Over 75% of respondents stated that the availability of clinical research, lab-based research, summer research programmes and QI/clinical audit projects was negatively impacted by Covid-19. Mitigation strategies included adaptation and adjustment in design of research projects; migration to online content delivery and collaborative platforms; virtualisation of research dissemination opportunities; increased workload for staff involved in delivery of research programmes; flexibility around assessment of research-based assignments; and importance of open communication. Covid-19 has affected traditional clinical research opportunities for medical students, particularly patient-facing projects, as well as laboratory-based research options. Mitigation strategies included the introduction of time- and cost-efficient virtual data collection methods. Some of these innovations have potential for ongoing and future development, but others are short-term responsive solutions that may prove less sustainable.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The Covid-19 pandemic forced undergraduate medical students and staff to adapt and adjust to new strategies for conducting research. The aim of this study was to investigate its impact on student research opportunities across Irish and UK medical schools and how these programmes have responded, both in terms of innovation and practical solutions.
METHODS
A 17-item online mixed methods survey was distributed to academic staff across 31 Irish and UK medical schools. Participants were asked about (a) the effect of the pandemic on undergraduate research teaching and project opportunities, (b) measures taken to mitigate pandemic effects on these curricular elements. Descriptive analysis was used to summarise quantitative data, and free-text responses were thematically grouped.
FINDINGS
We received a 66.74% (n = 21) response rate to our survey. Over 75% of respondents stated that the availability of clinical research, lab-based research, summer research programmes and QI/clinical audit projects was negatively impacted by Covid-19. Mitigation strategies included adaptation and adjustment in design of research projects; migration to online content delivery and collaborative platforms; virtualisation of research dissemination opportunities; increased workload for staff involved in delivery of research programmes; flexibility around assessment of research-based assignments; and importance of open communication.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
Covid-19 has affected traditional clinical research opportunities for medical students, particularly patient-facing projects, as well as laboratory-based research options. Mitigation strategies included the introduction of time- and cost-efficient virtual data collection methods. Some of these innovations have potential for ongoing and future development, but others are short-term responsive solutions that may prove less sustainable.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
86-91Informations de copyright
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd and The Association for the Study of Medical Education.
Références
Wijesooriya NR, Mishra V, Brand PLP, Rubin BK. COVID-19 and telehealth, education, and research adaptations. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2020;35:38-42.
Elmer SJ, Durocher JJ. Moving student research forward during the COVID-19 pandemic. Adv Physiol Educ. 2020;44(4):741-3.
Laidlaw A, Aiton J, Struthers J, Guild S. Developing research skills in medical students: AMEE guide no. 69. Med Teach. 2012;34(9):e754-71.
Möller R, Shoshan M. Medical students' research productivity and career preferences; a 2-year prospective follow-up study. BMC Med Educ. 2017;17(1):1, 51-7.
Cairney-Hill J, Edwards AE, Jaafar N, Gunganah K, Macavei VM, Khanji MY. Challenges and opportunities for undergraduate clinical teaching during and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic. J R Soc Med. 2021;114(3):113-6.
Harries AJ, Lee C, Jones L, et al. Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on medical students: a multicenter quantitative study. BMC Med Educ. 2021;21(1):14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02462-1
Duggan E, Doran K, O'Flynn S, O'Tuathaigh CM. Providing research opportunities for medical students: challenges and opportunities. Med Sci Educ. 2013;23:117-25.
Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Pers Psychol. 1975;28(4):563-75.
Taylor SJ, Bogdan R. Introduction to qualitative research methods: a guidebook and resource. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley; 1998.
Choi B, Jegatheeswaran L, Minocha A, Alhilani M, Nakhoul M, Mutengesa E. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on final year medical students in the United Kingdom: a national survey. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20(1):206. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02117-1
Lucey CR, Johnston SC. The transformational effects of COVID-19 on medical education. Jama. 2020;324(11):1033-4.
Chang Y, Ramnanan CJ. A review of literature on medical students and scholarly research. Acad Med. 2015;90(8):1162-73.
Lee MGY, Hu WCY, Bilszta JLC. Determining expected research skills of medical students on graduation: a systematic review. Med Sci Educ. 2020;30:1465-79.
Parsonnet J, Gruppuso PA, Kanter SL, Boninger M. Required vs. elective research and in-depth scholarship programs in the medical student curriculum. Acad Med. 2010;85(3):405-8.
Mallen C. Research in the time of COVID. Eur J Gen Pract. 2020;26(1):154-5.
Hui KY, Haines C, Bammann S, et al. To what extent is telehealth reported to be incorporated into undergraduate and postgraduate allied health curricula: a scoping review. PLoS One. 2021;16(8):e0256425. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256425
Cen L, Ruta D, Powell L, Hirsch B, Ng J. Quantitative approach to collaborative learning: performance prediction, individual assessment, and group composition. Int J Comput-Supported Collab Learn. 2016;11:187-225.
Hodges C, Moore S, Lockee B, Trust T, Bond, A. The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review 2020. Accessed at: https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning
Jeong H, Hmelo-Silver CE, Jo K. Ten years of computer-supported collaborative learning: a meta-analysis of CSCL in STEM education during 2005-2014. Educ Res Rev. 2019;28:100284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100284
Sarabipour S. Virtual conferences raise standards for accessibility and interactions. Elife. 2020;9:e62668. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.62668
Mehta N, End C, Kwan J, Bernstein S, Law M. Adapting medical education during crisis: Student-faculty partnerships as an enabler of success. Med Teach. 2020;11:1-2.
McWatt SC. Responding to Covid-19: a thematic analysis of students' perspectives on modified learning activities during an emergency transition to remote human anatomy education. Anat Sci Educ. 2021;14(6):721-38. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2136
Seymour-Walsh AE, Weber A, Bell A. Practical approaches to pedagogically rich online tutorials in health professions education. Rural Remote Health. 2020;20(2):6045. https://doi.org/10.22605/RRH6045