KIR2DS1-HLA-C status as a predictive marker for benefit from rituximab: a post-hoc analysis of the RICOVER-60 and CLL8 trials.

BACKGROUND

The addition of rituximab to chemotherapy has substantially improved outcomes for patients with B-cell malignancies. The mechanisms of action of rituximab include activation of natural killer cells. Killer-cell immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIRs) mediate natural killer cell function through interaction with HLA. We evaluated the clinical impact of KIR-HLA genotypes on rituximab-containing therapy.

METHODS

For this post-hoc analysis, we used data from the RICOVER-60 trial (NCT00052936) as the discovery cohort and the CLL8 trial (NCT00281918) as the validation cohort. RICOVER-60 included patients aged 61-80 years with aggressive B-cell lymphoma treated with CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) with or without rituximab. CLL8 included patients aged 30-81 years with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia treated with chemotherapy (fludarabine and cyclophosphamide; FC) with or without rituximab. We evaluated the KIR and HLA-C status of 519 patients with available blood samples in the RICOVER-60 trial and the KIR2DS1 and HLA-C status of 549 patients with available blood samples in the CLL8 trial, and evaluated their associations with event-free survival (RICOVER-60), progression-free survival, and overall survival (RICOVER-60 and CLL8).

FINDINGS

In the RICOVER-60 trial, 201 (39%) patients were positive for KIR2DS1, 79 (15%) were homozygous for HLA-C2, and 36 (7%) were positive for KIR2DS1 and homozygous for HLA-C2. In the CLL8 trial, 206 (38%) patients were positive for KIR2DS1, 75 (14%) were homozygous for HLA-C2, and 26 (5%) were positive for KIR2DS1 and homozygous for HLA-C2. In the RICOVER-60 trial, both KIR2DS1 and HLA-C status were identified as independent risk factors for survival. KIR2DS1 positivity, homozygosity for HLA-C2, and subsequent KIR2DS1-HLA-C status were associated with adverse clinical outcome in patients receiving rituximab-containing therapy (event-free survival for patients with KIR2DS1-HLA-C2/C2 vs all other patients, HR 2·6 [95% CI 1·4-4·7], p=0·0015; progression-free survival, 2·7 [1·5-5·1], p=0·0013; overall survival, 2·8 [1·5-5·4], p=0·0016) but not in patients receiving CHOP chemotherapy only (event-free survival, 0·9 [0·5-1·7], p=0·85; progression-free survival, 1·1 [0·6-2·0], p=0·81; overall survival, 1·2 [0·6-2·4], p=0·53). A significant interaction between KIR2DS1-HLA-C status and rituximab was observed (p=0·018 for event-free survival and p=0·034 for progression-free survival). In contrast to all other patients, those positive for KIR2DS1 and homozygous for HLA-C2 did not benefit from adding rituximab to CHOP chemotherapy (event-free survival, 1·9 [0·8-4·6], p=0·16; progression-free survival, 1·4 [0·6-3·4], p=0·48; overall survival, 1·6 [0·6-4·3], p=0·33). In the CLL8 trial, KIR2DS1-HLA-C status was confirmed as a predictive marker for benefit from rituximab therapy (p=0·024 for the interaction of KIR2DS1-HLA-C status and rituximab regarding progression-free survival). In contrast to all other patients, those positive for KIR2DS1 and homozygous for HLA-C2 did not benefit from adding rituximab to FC chemotherapy (progression-free survival, 2·1 [0·9-4·9], p=0·094; overall survival, 2·6 [0·5-12·7], p=0·21).

INTERPRETATION

Assessment of KIR2DS1 and HLA-C genotype might identify patients who would not benefit from rituximab, thereby allowing alternative therapies to be given. Further validation of these findings in prospective clinical trials is needed.

FUNDING

F Hoffman La Roche.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of interests DK-M reports personal fees, grants, and non-financial support from Novartis, ViiV Healthcare, and Gilead. SS reports personal fees, grants, and non-financial support from AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, Janssen, Novartis, and Sunesis. KF reports personal fees from AbbVie and Roche, outside the submitted work. VP reports non-financial support from Abbvie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Roche. JTB reports personal fees from Merck Sharp & Dohme and Incyte Pharmaceutical, and non-financial support from Gilead. LTh reports grants from the non-profit Wilhelm Sander Foundation, personal fees from EUSA Pharma and AstraZeneca, and non-financial support from AbbVie, EUSA Pharma, and Janssen. MB reports grants from the non-profit Deutsche José-Carreras Leukaemie Stiftung. All other authors declare no competing interests.