Competency Assessment in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Resident Education: A Systematic Review.
Journal
American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation
ISSN: 1537-7385
Titre abrégé: Am J Phys Med Rehabil
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8803677
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 12 2022
01 12 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
6
2
2022
medline:
22
11
2022
entrez:
5
2
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of this systematic review was to examine the scope and quality of research in physical medicine and rehabilitation resident education as it pertains to the six core competencies defined by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. All indexed years of Medline, Embase, and ERIC were searched using key words related to physical medicine and rehabilitation and medical education. Data were extracted on core competencies, content categories, teaching interventions, and study quality. From a sample of 2544 articles, 62 studies were included in this review. Frequencies of core competencies studied were: patient care 62.9%, medical knowledge 56.5%, systems-based practice 22.6%, practice-based learning and improvement 14.5%, professionalism 25.8%, and interpersonal and communication skills 22.6%. Musculoskeletal and pain medicine was the most frequently studied content category (33.9%). There was no significant difference in quality of studies between the six core competency groups ( P = 0.31). Available research is highly concentrated in patient care and medical knowledge competencies and in the musculoskeletal and pain medicine content category. This systematic review outlines the current state of education literature and highlights areas for further inquiry. This is an important step toward the translation of research into evidence-based educational practices.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35121682
doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001983
pii: 00002060-202212000-00004
doi:
Types de publication
Systematic Review
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1111-1116Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Financial disclosure statements have been obtained, and no conflicts of interest have been reported by the authors or by any individuals in control of the content of this article.
Références
Epstein RM: Assessment in medical education. N Engl J Med 2007;356:387–96
Edgar L, McLean S, Hogan S, Hamstram S, Holmboe E: The milestones guidebook. 2020. Available at: https://www.acgme.org/Portals/0/MilestonesGuidebook.pdf . Accessed July 6, 2021
Leach DC: Competence is a habit. JAMA 2002;287:243–4
Baer H, Edgar L, Franciso G, et al.: Physical medicine and rehabilitation milestones. 2020. Available at: https://www.acgme.org/Portals/0/PDFs/Milestones/PMRMilestones.pdf?ver=2015-11-06-120521-480 . Accessed July 6, 2021
Francisco GE, Yamazaki K, Raddatz M, et al.: Do milestone ratings predict physical medicine and rehabilitation board certification examination scores? Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2021;100:S34–9
Taylor CMI, Baer H, Edgar L, et al.: Improving the assessment of resident competency: physical medicine and rehabilitation milestones 2.0. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2021;100:S45
Eno C, Correa R, Stewart N, et al.: Milestones guidebook for residents and fellows. 2020. Available at: https://www.acgme.org/Portals/0/PDFs/Milestones/MilestonesGuidebookforResidentsFellows.pdf . Accessed July 6, 2021
McGrew SPMM: Scholarship in teaching and best evidence medical education: synergy for teaching and learning. Med Teach 2000;22:468–71
Faucett EA, Barry JY, McCrary HC, et al.: Otolaryngology resident education and the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education core competencies: a systematic review. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2018;144:360–70
American Board of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation: Your assessment design: customizing your LA-PM&R Content. Available at: https://www.abpmr.org/CC/Assessment/Customization . Accessed December 3, 2021
Berger AS, Niedra E, Brooks SG, et al.: Teaching professionalism in postgraduate medical education: a systematic review. Acad Med 2020;95:938–46
Reed DA, Cook DA, Beckman TJ, et al.: Association between funding and quality of published medical education research. JAMA 2007;298:1002–9
Cook DA, Reed DA: Appraising the quality of medical education research methods: the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument and the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale-Education. Acad Med 2015;90:1067–76
Cook DA, Hatala R, Brydges R, et al.: Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2011;306:978–88
Yang AJ, Haring RS, Swenson TL, et al.: Factors influencing fellowship decision making during physical medicine & rehabilitation residency. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2021;100:396–401
Houtrow AJ, Pruitt DW: Meeting the growing need for pediatric rehabilitation medicine physicians. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2016;97:501–6
Graffam B: Active learning in medical education: strategies for beginning implementation. Med Teach 2007;29:38–42
Sawatsky AP, Zickmund SL, Berlacher K, et al.: Understanding the challenges to facilitating active learning in the resident conferences: a qualitative study of internal medicine faculty and resident perspectives. Med Educ Online 2015;20:27289
Cheston CC, Flickinger TE, Chisolm MS: Social media use in medical education: a systematic review. Acad Med 2013;88:893–901
Collins J: Medical education research: challenges and opportunities. Radiology 2006;240:639–47