Comparison of neuromuscular block measured by compressomyography at the upper arm and electromyography at the adductor pollicis muscle in obese and non-obese patients: An observational study.


Journal

Journal of clinical anesthesia
ISSN: 1873-4529
Titre abrégé: J Clin Anesth
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8812166

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2022
Historique:
received: 12 08 2021
revised: 06 01 2022
accepted: 28 01 2022
pubmed: 9 2 2022
medline: 18 3 2022
entrez: 8 2 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Quantitative neuromuscular monitoring is traditionally evaluated at the adductor pollicis muscle. By contrast, the TOF-Cuff compressomyograph evaluates neuromuscular block (NMB) at the upper arm. However, compressomyography has not been fully validated against other monitoring entities. This study evaluates the agreement between NMB measured by compressomyography at the upper arm and electromyography at the adductor pollicis muscle during various levels of neuromuscular block in patients with and without obesity. NMB was measured at the upper arm by compressomyography (TOF-Cuff) and by electromyography (GE-NMT) at the adductor pollicis. Prospective, multicenter, observational study. Secondary and tertiary care hospitals' operating theatres. 200 non-obese and 50 obese patients. During onset and offset of deep (post-tetanic-count 1-15 twitches), moderate (Train-of-Four-count 1-3 twitches) and shallow (Train-of-Four-ratio 0.01-1.0) depths of NMB were measured in obese and non-obese patients. The bias and limits of agreement of both devices were calculated using a Bland-Altman analysis for repeated measurements. Data obtained during spontaneous recovery (i.e. without the use of reversal agents) were used in the primary analyses. Data from enrolled patients yielded 942 paired post-tetanic-counts, 1175 paired train-of-four-counts and 1574 paired train-of-four ratios during spontaneous recovery. In non-obese patients, mean bias (95% CI) between the two devices was 3.405 (2.294 to 4.517) during deep NMB; -0.023 (-0.205 to 0.160) during moderate NMB and 0.312 (0.287 to 0.338) during shallow NMB. In obese patients, bias was -0.170 (-2.872 to 2.531); 0.178 (-0.202 to 0.558); 0.384 (0.299 to 0.469) for deep, moderate and shallow NMB respectively. There is variable disagreement between the level of NMB measured at the upper arm by compressomyography and at the adductor pollicis muscle measured by electromyography, throughout the various stages of NMB in obese and non-obese patients. Recovery of NMB on compressomyography preceded recovery on electromyography, which may have consequences for reversal and extubation decisions in clinical practice.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35134618
pii: S0952-8180(22)00029-0
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2022.110673
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Neuromuscular Nondepolarizing Agents 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study Observational Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

110673

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

G H M Honing (GHM)

Department of Anesthesiology LUMC, Albinusdreef 2, 2333, ZA, Leiden, the Netherlands. Electronic address: g.h.m.honing@lumc.nl.

B Torensma (B)

Department of Anesthesiology LUMC, Albinusdreef 2, 2333, ZA, Leiden, the Netherlands; Dutch Obesity Clinic West, Bordewijklaan 5, 2591, XR, The Hague, the Netherlands.

C H Martini (CH)

Department of Anesthesiology LUMC, Albinusdreef 2, 2333, ZA, Leiden, the Netherlands.

K B Hoek (KB)

Department of Anesthesiology LUMC, Albinusdreef 2, 2333, ZA, Leiden, the Netherlands.

M van Velzen (M)

Department of Anesthesiology LUMC, Albinusdreef 2, 2333, ZA, Leiden, the Netherlands.

E Olofsen (E)

Department of Anesthesiology LUMC, Albinusdreef 2, 2333, ZA, Leiden, the Netherlands.

M Niesters (M)

Department of Anesthesiology LUMC, Albinusdreef 2, 2333, ZA, Leiden, the Netherlands.

A Dahan (A)

Department of Anesthesiology LUMC, Albinusdreef 2, 2333, ZA, Leiden, the Netherlands.

M Boon (M)

Department of Anesthesiology LUMC, Albinusdreef 2, 2333, ZA, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH